Cargando…

Back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hand hygiene and isolation are basic, but very effective, means of preventing the spread of pathogens in healthcare. Although the principle may be straightforward, this review highlights some of the controversies regarding the implementation and efficacy of these interventions. RE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin Huang, G. Khai, Stewardson, Andrew J., Lindsay Grayson, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24945613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000080
_version_ 1782324848388734976
author Lin Huang, G. Khai
Stewardson, Andrew J.
Lindsay Grayson, M.
author_facet Lin Huang, G. Khai
Stewardson, Andrew J.
Lindsay Grayson, M.
author_sort Lin Huang, G. Khai
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hand hygiene and isolation are basic, but very effective, means of preventing the spread of pathogens in healthcare. Although the principle may be straightforward, this review highlights some of the controversies regarding the implementation and efficacy of these interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: Hand hygiene compliance is an accepted measure of quality and safety in many countries. The evidence for the efficacy of hand hygiene in directly reducing rates of hospital-acquired infections has strengthened in recent years, particularly in terms of reduced rates of staphylococcal sepsis. Defining the key components of effective implementation strategies and the ideal method(s) of assessing hand hygiene compliance are dependent on a range of factors associated with the healthcare system. Although patient isolation continues to be an important strategy, particularly in outbreaks, it also has some limitations and can be associated with negative effects. Recent detailed molecular epidemiology studies of key healthcare-acquired pathogens have questioned the true efficacy of isolation, alone as an effective method for the routine prevention of disease transmission. SUMMARY: Hand hygiene and isolation are key components of basic infection control. Recent insights into the benefits, limitations and even adverse effects of these interventions are important for their optimal implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4086774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40867742014-07-09 Back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation Lin Huang, G. Khai Stewardson, Andrew J. Lindsay Grayson, M. Curr Opin Infect Dis NOSOCOMIAL AND HEALTHCARE RELATED INFECTIONS: Edited by Trish M. Perl PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hand hygiene and isolation are basic, but very effective, means of preventing the spread of pathogens in healthcare. Although the principle may be straightforward, this review highlights some of the controversies regarding the implementation and efficacy of these interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: Hand hygiene compliance is an accepted measure of quality and safety in many countries. The evidence for the efficacy of hand hygiene in directly reducing rates of hospital-acquired infections has strengthened in recent years, particularly in terms of reduced rates of staphylococcal sepsis. Defining the key components of effective implementation strategies and the ideal method(s) of assessing hand hygiene compliance are dependent on a range of factors associated with the healthcare system. Although patient isolation continues to be an important strategy, particularly in outbreaks, it also has some limitations and can be associated with negative effects. Recent detailed molecular epidemiology studies of key healthcare-acquired pathogens have questioned the true efficacy of isolation, alone as an effective method for the routine prevention of disease transmission. SUMMARY: Hand hygiene and isolation are key components of basic infection control. Recent insights into the benefits, limitations and even adverse effects of these interventions are important for their optimal implementation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2014-08 2014-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4086774/ /pubmed/24945613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000080 Text en © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0./ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivitives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0.
spellingShingle NOSOCOMIAL AND HEALTHCARE RELATED INFECTIONS: Edited by Trish M. Perl
Lin Huang, G. Khai
Stewardson, Andrew J.
Lindsay Grayson, M.
Back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation
title Back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation
title_full Back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation
title_fullStr Back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation
title_full_unstemmed Back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation
title_short Back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation
title_sort back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation
topic NOSOCOMIAL AND HEALTHCARE RELATED INFECTIONS: Edited by Trish M. Perl
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24945613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000080
work_keys_str_mv AT linhuanggkhai backtobasicshandhygieneandisolation
AT stewardsonandrewj backtobasicshandhygieneandisolation
AT lindsaygraysonm backtobasicshandhygieneandisolation