Cargando…
Back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hand hygiene and isolation are basic, but very effective, means of preventing the spread of pathogens in healthcare. Although the principle may be straightforward, this review highlights some of the controversies regarding the implementation and efficacy of these interventions. RE...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24945613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000080 |
_version_ | 1782324848388734976 |
---|---|
author | Lin Huang, G. Khai Stewardson, Andrew J. Lindsay Grayson, M. |
author_facet | Lin Huang, G. Khai Stewardson, Andrew J. Lindsay Grayson, M. |
author_sort | Lin Huang, G. Khai |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hand hygiene and isolation are basic, but very effective, means of preventing the spread of pathogens in healthcare. Although the principle may be straightforward, this review highlights some of the controversies regarding the implementation and efficacy of these interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: Hand hygiene compliance is an accepted measure of quality and safety in many countries. The evidence for the efficacy of hand hygiene in directly reducing rates of hospital-acquired infections has strengthened in recent years, particularly in terms of reduced rates of staphylococcal sepsis. Defining the key components of effective implementation strategies and the ideal method(s) of assessing hand hygiene compliance are dependent on a range of factors associated with the healthcare system. Although patient isolation continues to be an important strategy, particularly in outbreaks, it also has some limitations and can be associated with negative effects. Recent detailed molecular epidemiology studies of key healthcare-acquired pathogens have questioned the true efficacy of isolation, alone as an effective method for the routine prevention of disease transmission. SUMMARY: Hand hygiene and isolation are key components of basic infection control. Recent insights into the benefits, limitations and even adverse effects of these interventions are important for their optimal implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4086774 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40867742014-07-09 Back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation Lin Huang, G. Khai Stewardson, Andrew J. Lindsay Grayson, M. Curr Opin Infect Dis NOSOCOMIAL AND HEALTHCARE RELATED INFECTIONS: Edited by Trish M. Perl PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hand hygiene and isolation are basic, but very effective, means of preventing the spread of pathogens in healthcare. Although the principle may be straightforward, this review highlights some of the controversies regarding the implementation and efficacy of these interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: Hand hygiene compliance is an accepted measure of quality and safety in many countries. The evidence for the efficacy of hand hygiene in directly reducing rates of hospital-acquired infections has strengthened in recent years, particularly in terms of reduced rates of staphylococcal sepsis. Defining the key components of effective implementation strategies and the ideal method(s) of assessing hand hygiene compliance are dependent on a range of factors associated with the healthcare system. Although patient isolation continues to be an important strategy, particularly in outbreaks, it also has some limitations and can be associated with negative effects. Recent detailed molecular epidemiology studies of key healthcare-acquired pathogens have questioned the true efficacy of isolation, alone as an effective method for the routine prevention of disease transmission. SUMMARY: Hand hygiene and isolation are key components of basic infection control. Recent insights into the benefits, limitations and even adverse effects of these interventions are important for their optimal implementation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2014-08 2014-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4086774/ /pubmed/24945613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000080 Text en © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0./ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivitives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0. |
spellingShingle | NOSOCOMIAL AND HEALTHCARE RELATED INFECTIONS: Edited by Trish M. Perl Lin Huang, G. Khai Stewardson, Andrew J. Lindsay Grayson, M. Back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation |
title | Back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation |
title_full | Back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation |
title_fullStr | Back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation |
title_full_unstemmed | Back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation |
title_short | Back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation |
title_sort | back to basics: hand hygiene and isolation |
topic | NOSOCOMIAL AND HEALTHCARE RELATED INFECTIONS: Edited by Trish M. Perl |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24945613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000080 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linhuanggkhai backtobasicshandhygieneandisolation AT stewardsonandrewj backtobasicshandhygieneandisolation AT lindsaygraysonm backtobasicshandhygieneandisolation |