Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of switching to latanoprost 0.005%–timolol maleate 0.5% fixed-combination eyedrops from an unfixed combination for 36 months

PURPOSE: We prospectively investigated the intraocular pressure (IOP)-reducing effect, the visual field-maintenance effect, and the adverse reactions caused by administration of latanoprost/timolol maleate fixed-combination eyedrops for 3 years. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were 162 patients (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inoue, Kenji, Okayama, Ryoko, Higa, Risako, Tomita, Goji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061275
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S63590
_version_ 1782324854506127360
author Inoue, Kenji
Okayama, Ryoko
Higa, Risako
Tomita, Goji
author_facet Inoue, Kenji
Okayama, Ryoko
Higa, Risako
Tomita, Goji
author_sort Inoue, Kenji
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We prospectively investigated the intraocular pressure (IOP)-reducing effect, the visual field-maintenance effect, and the adverse reactions caused by administration of latanoprost/timolol maleate fixed-combination eyedrops for 3 years. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were 162 patients (162 eyes) with glaucoma or ocular hypotension who were using latanoprost and timolol maleate eyedrops concomitantly. The latanoprost and timolol maleate eyedrop regimen was discontinued without any washout period and subsequently changed to a latanoprost–timolol maleate fixed-combination eyedrop regimen. IOP values before the change and at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months after the change were measured and compared. The Humphrey visual field test was conducted before the change and at 12, 24, and 36 months after the change, and mean-deviation values were compared. Adverse reactions were assessed at every checkup. RESULTS: The IOPs before the change and at 6–36 months after the change were 15.2±3.3 mmHg and 14.3–15.2 mmHg, respectively, and a significant decrease was observed at 36 months after the change (P<0.01). Mean-deviation values before the change and at 12–36 months after the change were −9.11±6.94 dB and −10.08 to −9.22 dB, respectively, and these values were not significantly different (P=0.2148). Within the 36-month period, the eyedrops were discontinued because of insufficient IOP decrease in 33 cases (20.4%) and adverse reactions in eleven cases (6.8%). CONCLUSION: IOP and the visual field were maintained for 3 years when a latanoprost and timolol maleate eyedrop regimen was changed to a latanoprost–timolol maleate fixed-combination eyedrop regimen. However, administration of the latanoprost–timolol maleate fixed-combination eyedrops was discontinued in approximately 27% of cases because of insufficient IOP decrease and adverse reactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4086851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40868512014-07-24 Efficacy and safety of switching to latanoprost 0.005%–timolol maleate 0.5% fixed-combination eyedrops from an unfixed combination for 36 months Inoue, Kenji Okayama, Ryoko Higa, Risako Tomita, Goji Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: We prospectively investigated the intraocular pressure (IOP)-reducing effect, the visual field-maintenance effect, and the adverse reactions caused by administration of latanoprost/timolol maleate fixed-combination eyedrops for 3 years. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were 162 patients (162 eyes) with glaucoma or ocular hypotension who were using latanoprost and timolol maleate eyedrops concomitantly. The latanoprost and timolol maleate eyedrop regimen was discontinued without any washout period and subsequently changed to a latanoprost–timolol maleate fixed-combination eyedrop regimen. IOP values before the change and at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months after the change were measured and compared. The Humphrey visual field test was conducted before the change and at 12, 24, and 36 months after the change, and mean-deviation values were compared. Adverse reactions were assessed at every checkup. RESULTS: The IOPs before the change and at 6–36 months after the change were 15.2±3.3 mmHg and 14.3–15.2 mmHg, respectively, and a significant decrease was observed at 36 months after the change (P<0.01). Mean-deviation values before the change and at 12–36 months after the change were −9.11±6.94 dB and −10.08 to −9.22 dB, respectively, and these values were not significantly different (P=0.2148). Within the 36-month period, the eyedrops were discontinued because of insufficient IOP decrease in 33 cases (20.4%) and adverse reactions in eleven cases (6.8%). CONCLUSION: IOP and the visual field were maintained for 3 years when a latanoprost and timolol maleate eyedrop regimen was changed to a latanoprost–timolol maleate fixed-combination eyedrop regimen. However, administration of the latanoprost–timolol maleate fixed-combination eyedrops was discontinued in approximately 27% of cases because of insufficient IOP decrease and adverse reactions. Dove Medical Press 2014-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4086851/ /pubmed/25061275 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S63590 Text en © 2014 Inoue et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Inoue, Kenji
Okayama, Ryoko
Higa, Risako
Tomita, Goji
Efficacy and safety of switching to latanoprost 0.005%–timolol maleate 0.5% fixed-combination eyedrops from an unfixed combination for 36 months
title Efficacy and safety of switching to latanoprost 0.005%–timolol maleate 0.5% fixed-combination eyedrops from an unfixed combination for 36 months
title_full Efficacy and safety of switching to latanoprost 0.005%–timolol maleate 0.5% fixed-combination eyedrops from an unfixed combination for 36 months
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of switching to latanoprost 0.005%–timolol maleate 0.5% fixed-combination eyedrops from an unfixed combination for 36 months
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of switching to latanoprost 0.005%–timolol maleate 0.5% fixed-combination eyedrops from an unfixed combination for 36 months
title_short Efficacy and safety of switching to latanoprost 0.005%–timolol maleate 0.5% fixed-combination eyedrops from an unfixed combination for 36 months
title_sort efficacy and safety of switching to latanoprost 0.005%–timolol maleate 0.5% fixed-combination eyedrops from an unfixed combination for 36 months
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4086851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061275
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S63590
work_keys_str_mv AT inouekenji efficacyandsafetyofswitchingtolatanoprost0005timololmaleate05fixedcombinationeyedropsfromanunfixedcombinationfor36months
AT okayamaryoko efficacyandsafetyofswitchingtolatanoprost0005timololmaleate05fixedcombinationeyedropsfromanunfixedcombinationfor36months
AT higarisako efficacyandsafetyofswitchingtolatanoprost0005timololmaleate05fixedcombinationeyedropsfromanunfixedcombinationfor36months
AT tomitagoji efficacyandsafetyofswitchingtolatanoprost0005timololmaleate05fixedcombinationeyedropsfromanunfixedcombinationfor36months