Cargando…

Hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: retrospective review

Objective To determine casemix adjusted hospital level utilization of minimally invasive surgery for four common surgical procedures (appendectomy, colectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, and lung lobectomy) in the United States. Design Retrospective review. Setting United States. Participants Nati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooper, Michol A, Hutfless, Susan, Segev, Dorry L, Ibrahim, Andrew, Lyu, Heather, Makary, Martin A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4087169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25005264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4198
_version_ 1782324891583774720
author Cooper, Michol A
Hutfless, Susan
Segev, Dorry L
Ibrahim, Andrew
Lyu, Heather
Makary, Martin A
author_facet Cooper, Michol A
Hutfless, Susan
Segev, Dorry L
Ibrahim, Andrew
Lyu, Heather
Makary, Martin A
author_sort Cooper, Michol A
collection PubMed
description Objective To determine casemix adjusted hospital level utilization of minimally invasive surgery for four common surgical procedures (appendectomy, colectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, and lung lobectomy) in the United States. Design Retrospective review. Setting United States. Participants Nationwide inpatient sample database, United States 2010. Methods For each procedure, a propensity score model was used to calculate the predicted proportion of minimally invasive operations for each hospital based on patient characteristics. For each procedure, hospitals were categorized into thirds (low, medium, and high) based on their actual to predicted proportion of utilization of minimally invasive surgery. Main outcome measures The primary outcome measures were the actual and predicted proportion of procedures performed with minimally invasive surgery. Secondary outcome measures included surgical complications and hospital characteristics. Results Mean hospital utilization of minimally invasive surgery was 71.0% (423/596) for appendectomy (range 40.9-93.1% (244-555)), 28.4% (154/541) for colectomy (6.7-49.8% (36/541-269/541)), 13.0% (65/499) for hysterectomy (0.0-33.6% (0/499-168/499)), and 32.0% (67/208) for lung lobectomy (3.6-65.7% (7.5/208-137/208)). Utilization of minimally invasive surgery was highly variable for each procedure type. There was noticeable discordance between actual and predicted utilization of the surgery (range of actual to predicted ratio for appendectomy 0-1.49; colectomy 0-3.88; hysterectomy 0-6.68; lung lobectomy 0-2.51). Surgical complications were less common with minimally invasive surgery compared with open surgery, respectively: overall rate for appendectomy 3.94% (1439/36 513) v 7.90% (958/12 123), P<0.001; for colectomy: 13.8% (1689/12 242) v 35.8% (8837/24 687), P<0.001; for hysterectomy: 4.69% (270/5757) v 6.64% (1988/29 940), P<0.001; and for lung lobectomy: 17.1% (367/2145) v 25.4% (971/3824), P<0.05. High utilization of minimally invasive surgery was associated with urban location (appendectomy: odds ratio 4.66, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 18.5; colectomy: 4.59, 1.04 to 20.3; hysterectomy: 15.0, 2.98 to 75.0), large hospital size (hysterectomy: 8.70, 1.62 to 46.8), teaching hospital (hysterectomy: 5.41, 1.27 to 23.1), Midwest region (appendectomy: 7.85, 1.26 to 49.1), south region (appendectomy: 21.0, 3.79 to 117; colectomy: 10.0, 1.83 to 54.7), and west region (appendectomy: 9.33, 1.48 to 58.8). Conclusion Hospital utilization of minimally invasive surgery for appendectomy, colectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, and lung lobectomy varies widely in the United States, representing a disparity in the surgical care delivered nationwide.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4087169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40871692014-07-10 Hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: retrospective review Cooper, Michol A Hutfless, Susan Segev, Dorry L Ibrahim, Andrew Lyu, Heather Makary, Martin A BMJ Research Objective To determine casemix adjusted hospital level utilization of minimally invasive surgery for four common surgical procedures (appendectomy, colectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, and lung lobectomy) in the United States. Design Retrospective review. Setting United States. Participants Nationwide inpatient sample database, United States 2010. Methods For each procedure, a propensity score model was used to calculate the predicted proportion of minimally invasive operations for each hospital based on patient characteristics. For each procedure, hospitals were categorized into thirds (low, medium, and high) based on their actual to predicted proportion of utilization of minimally invasive surgery. Main outcome measures The primary outcome measures were the actual and predicted proportion of procedures performed with minimally invasive surgery. Secondary outcome measures included surgical complications and hospital characteristics. Results Mean hospital utilization of minimally invasive surgery was 71.0% (423/596) for appendectomy (range 40.9-93.1% (244-555)), 28.4% (154/541) for colectomy (6.7-49.8% (36/541-269/541)), 13.0% (65/499) for hysterectomy (0.0-33.6% (0/499-168/499)), and 32.0% (67/208) for lung lobectomy (3.6-65.7% (7.5/208-137/208)). Utilization of minimally invasive surgery was highly variable for each procedure type. There was noticeable discordance between actual and predicted utilization of the surgery (range of actual to predicted ratio for appendectomy 0-1.49; colectomy 0-3.88; hysterectomy 0-6.68; lung lobectomy 0-2.51). Surgical complications were less common with minimally invasive surgery compared with open surgery, respectively: overall rate for appendectomy 3.94% (1439/36 513) v 7.90% (958/12 123), P<0.001; for colectomy: 13.8% (1689/12 242) v 35.8% (8837/24 687), P<0.001; for hysterectomy: 4.69% (270/5757) v 6.64% (1988/29 940), P<0.001; and for lung lobectomy: 17.1% (367/2145) v 25.4% (971/3824), P<0.05. High utilization of minimally invasive surgery was associated with urban location (appendectomy: odds ratio 4.66, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 18.5; colectomy: 4.59, 1.04 to 20.3; hysterectomy: 15.0, 2.98 to 75.0), large hospital size (hysterectomy: 8.70, 1.62 to 46.8), teaching hospital (hysterectomy: 5.41, 1.27 to 23.1), Midwest region (appendectomy: 7.85, 1.26 to 49.1), south region (appendectomy: 21.0, 3.79 to 117; colectomy: 10.0, 1.83 to 54.7), and west region (appendectomy: 9.33, 1.48 to 58.8). Conclusion Hospital utilization of minimally invasive surgery for appendectomy, colectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, and lung lobectomy varies widely in the United States, representing a disparity in the surgical care delivered nationwide. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2014-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4087169/ /pubmed/25005264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4198 Text en © Cooper et al 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Cooper, Michol A
Hutfless, Susan
Segev, Dorry L
Ibrahim, Andrew
Lyu, Heather
Makary, Martin A
Hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: retrospective review
title Hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: retrospective review
title_full Hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: retrospective review
title_fullStr Hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: retrospective review
title_full_unstemmed Hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: retrospective review
title_short Hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: retrospective review
title_sort hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the united states: retrospective review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4087169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25005264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4198
work_keys_str_mv AT coopermichola hospitallevelunderutilizationofminimallyinvasivesurgeryintheunitedstatesretrospectivereview
AT hutflesssusan hospitallevelunderutilizationofminimallyinvasivesurgeryintheunitedstatesretrospectivereview
AT segevdorryl hospitallevelunderutilizationofminimallyinvasivesurgeryintheunitedstatesretrospectivereview
AT ibrahimandrew hospitallevelunderutilizationofminimallyinvasivesurgeryintheunitedstatesretrospectivereview
AT lyuheather hospitallevelunderutilizationofminimallyinvasivesurgeryintheunitedstatesretrospectivereview
AT makarymartina hospitallevelunderutilizationofminimallyinvasivesurgeryintheunitedstatesretrospectivereview