Cargando…

Comparable bone healing capacity of different bone graft matrices in a rabbit segmental defect model

We compared the bone healing capacity of three different demineralized bone matrix (DBM) products applied using different carrier molecules (hyaluronic acid [HA] vs. carboxymethylcellulose [CMC]) or bone compositions (cortical bone vs. cortical bone and cancellous bone) in a rabbit segmental defect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jong Min, Kim, Myoung Hwan, Kang, Seong Soo, Kim, Gonhyung, Choi, Seok Hwa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Veterinary Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4087232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24675830
http://dx.doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2014.15.2.289
_version_ 1782324898674245632
author Kim, Jong Min
Kim, Myoung Hwan
Kang, Seong Soo
Kim, Gonhyung
Choi, Seok Hwa
author_facet Kim, Jong Min
Kim, Myoung Hwan
Kang, Seong Soo
Kim, Gonhyung
Choi, Seok Hwa
author_sort Kim, Jong Min
collection PubMed
description We compared the bone healing capacity of three different demineralized bone matrix (DBM) products applied using different carrier molecules (hyaluronic acid [HA] vs. carboxymethylcellulose [CMC]) or bone compositions (cortical bone vs. cortical bone and cancellous bone) in a rabbit segmental defect model. Overall, 15-mm segmental defects in the left and right radiuses were created in 36 New Zealand White rabbits and filled with HA-based demineralized cortical bone matrix (DBX), CMC-based demineralized cortical bone matrix (DB) or CMC-based demineralized cortical bone with cancellous bone (NDDB), and the wound area was evaluated at 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-implantation. DBX showed significantly lower radiopacity, bone volume fraction, and bone mineral density than DB and NDDB before implantation. However, bone healing score, bone volume fraction, bone mineral density, and residual bone area at 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-implantation revealed no significant differences in bone healing capacity. Overall, three DBM products with different carrier molecules or bone compositions showed similar bone healing capacity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4087232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Society of Veterinary Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40872322014-07-10 Comparable bone healing capacity of different bone graft matrices in a rabbit segmental defect model Kim, Jong Min Kim, Myoung Hwan Kang, Seong Soo Kim, Gonhyung Choi, Seok Hwa J Vet Sci Original Article We compared the bone healing capacity of three different demineralized bone matrix (DBM) products applied using different carrier molecules (hyaluronic acid [HA] vs. carboxymethylcellulose [CMC]) or bone compositions (cortical bone vs. cortical bone and cancellous bone) in a rabbit segmental defect model. Overall, 15-mm segmental defects in the left and right radiuses were created in 36 New Zealand White rabbits and filled with HA-based demineralized cortical bone matrix (DBX), CMC-based demineralized cortical bone matrix (DB) or CMC-based demineralized cortical bone with cancellous bone (NDDB), and the wound area was evaluated at 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-implantation. DBX showed significantly lower radiopacity, bone volume fraction, and bone mineral density than DB and NDDB before implantation. However, bone healing score, bone volume fraction, bone mineral density, and residual bone area at 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-implantation revealed no significant differences in bone healing capacity. Overall, three DBM products with different carrier molecules or bone compositions showed similar bone healing capacity. The Korean Society of Veterinary Science 2014-06 2014-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4087232/ /pubmed/24675830 http://dx.doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2014.15.2.289 Text en © 2014 The Korean Society of Veterinary Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Jong Min
Kim, Myoung Hwan
Kang, Seong Soo
Kim, Gonhyung
Choi, Seok Hwa
Comparable bone healing capacity of different bone graft matrices in a rabbit segmental defect model
title Comparable bone healing capacity of different bone graft matrices in a rabbit segmental defect model
title_full Comparable bone healing capacity of different bone graft matrices in a rabbit segmental defect model
title_fullStr Comparable bone healing capacity of different bone graft matrices in a rabbit segmental defect model
title_full_unstemmed Comparable bone healing capacity of different bone graft matrices in a rabbit segmental defect model
title_short Comparable bone healing capacity of different bone graft matrices in a rabbit segmental defect model
title_sort comparable bone healing capacity of different bone graft matrices in a rabbit segmental defect model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4087232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24675830
http://dx.doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2014.15.2.289
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjongmin comparablebonehealingcapacityofdifferentbonegraftmatricesinarabbitsegmentaldefectmodel
AT kimmyounghwan comparablebonehealingcapacityofdifferentbonegraftmatricesinarabbitsegmentaldefectmodel
AT kangseongsoo comparablebonehealingcapacityofdifferentbonegraftmatricesinarabbitsegmentaldefectmodel
AT kimgonhyung comparablebonehealingcapacityofdifferentbonegraftmatricesinarabbitsegmentaldefectmodel
AT choiseokhwa comparablebonehealingcapacityofdifferentbonegraftmatricesinarabbitsegmentaldefectmodel