Cargando…
Why functions are not special dispositions: an improved classification of realizables for top-level ontologies
BACKGROUND: The concept of function is central to both biology and technology, but neither in philosophy nor in formal ontology is there a generally accepted theory of functions. In particular, there is no consensus how to include functions into a top-level ontology or whether to include them at all...
Autores principales: | Röhl, Johannes, Jansen, Ludger |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4089563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25009736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-1480-5-27 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Representing dispositions
por: Röhl, Johannes, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Proposed actions are no actions: re-modeling an ontology design pattern with a realist top-level ontology
por: Seddig-Raufie, Djamila, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Mechanisms in biomedical ontology
por: Röhl, Johannes
Publicado: (2012) -
Effects of Guideline-Based Training on the Quality of Formal Ontologies: A Randomized Controlled Trial
por: Boeker, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Grains, components and mixtures in biomedical ontologies
por: Jansen, Ludger, et al.
Publicado: (2011)