Cargando…

Cardiac and renal cell therapies: similarities and differences

Patients with terminal cardiac or renal disease have few therapeutic options besides organ transplantation. Optimally, cell therapies would be used both in acute and chronic stages of such diseases. In the injured myocardium, the main therapeutic goal is reestablishment of adequate perfusion and car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takiya, Christina M, Borojevic, Radovan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4089582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25018909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/kisup.2011.23
_version_ 1782325130824777728
author Takiya, Christina M
Borojevic, Radovan
author_facet Takiya, Christina M
Borojevic, Radovan
author_sort Takiya, Christina M
collection PubMed
description Patients with terminal cardiac or renal disease have few therapeutic options besides organ transplantation. Optimally, cell therapies would be used both in acute and chronic stages of such diseases. In the injured myocardium, the main therapeutic goal is reestablishment of adequate perfusion and cardiac output. This can be achieved by stem cell (SC) infusions, and currently several clinical trials have provided promising results. Considering the heart's low intrinsic capacity for regeneration and its paucity of resident cardiac SCs, we believe that induction of angiogenesis must be the primary goal, thereby promoting activation of resident SCs as well as mobilization of perivascular mesenchymal SCs that can mediate myocardial regeneration. Renal tissue, in contrast to the myocardium, has a high intrinsic capacity to respond to injuries and thus repair itself. Infusion of bone marrow (BM) cells or of their sub-populations protects the injured renal tissue and elicits immediate activation and proliferation of resident cells, which are able to undertake repair and regeneration of structures of both mesenchymal and epithelial origin. Experimental evidence indicates that infused cells function essentially through paracrine pathways, decreasing inflammation and fibrosis. In both severe cardiac and renal disorders, cell therapies appear to be a promising therapeutic option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4089582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40895822014-07-11 Cardiac and renal cell therapies: similarities and differences Takiya, Christina M Borojevic, Radovan Kidney Int Suppl (2011) Mini Review Patients with terminal cardiac or renal disease have few therapeutic options besides organ transplantation. Optimally, cell therapies would be used both in acute and chronic stages of such diseases. In the injured myocardium, the main therapeutic goal is reestablishment of adequate perfusion and cardiac output. This can be achieved by stem cell (SC) infusions, and currently several clinical trials have provided promising results. Considering the heart's low intrinsic capacity for regeneration and its paucity of resident cardiac SCs, we believe that induction of angiogenesis must be the primary goal, thereby promoting activation of resident SCs as well as mobilization of perivascular mesenchymal SCs that can mediate myocardial regeneration. Renal tissue, in contrast to the myocardium, has a high intrinsic capacity to respond to injuries and thus repair itself. Infusion of bone marrow (BM) cells or of their sub-populations protects the injured renal tissue and elicits immediate activation and proliferation of resident cells, which are able to undertake repair and regeneration of structures of both mesenchymal and epithelial origin. Experimental evidence indicates that infused cells function essentially through paracrine pathways, decreasing inflammation and fibrosis. In both severe cardiac and renal disorders, cell therapies appear to be a promising therapeutic option. Nature Publishing Group 2011-09 2011-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4089582/ /pubmed/25018909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/kisup.2011.23 Text en Copyright © 2011 International Society of Nephrology
spellingShingle Mini Review
Takiya, Christina M
Borojevic, Radovan
Cardiac and renal cell therapies: similarities and differences
title Cardiac and renal cell therapies: similarities and differences
title_full Cardiac and renal cell therapies: similarities and differences
title_fullStr Cardiac and renal cell therapies: similarities and differences
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac and renal cell therapies: similarities and differences
title_short Cardiac and renal cell therapies: similarities and differences
title_sort cardiac and renal cell therapies: similarities and differences
topic Mini Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4089582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25018909
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/kisup.2011.23
work_keys_str_mv AT takiyachristinam cardiacandrenalcelltherapiessimilaritiesanddifferences
AT borojevicradovan cardiacandrenalcelltherapiessimilaritiesanddifferences