Cargando…

Validation of the Modes of Transmission Model as a Tool to Prioritize HIV Prevention Targets: A Comparative Modelling Analysis

BACKGROUND: The static Modes of Transmission (MOT) model predicts the annual fraction of new HIV infections acquired across subgroups (MOT metric), and is used to focus HIV prevention. Using synthetic epidemics via a dynamical model, we assessed the validity of the MOT metric for identifying epidemi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mishra, Sharmistha, Pickles, Michael, Blanchard, James F., Moses, Stephen, Shubber, Zara, Boily, Marie-Claude
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4090151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25014543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101690
_version_ 1782325219605610496
author Mishra, Sharmistha
Pickles, Michael
Blanchard, James F.
Moses, Stephen
Shubber, Zara
Boily, Marie-Claude
author_facet Mishra, Sharmistha
Pickles, Michael
Blanchard, James F.
Moses, Stephen
Shubber, Zara
Boily, Marie-Claude
author_sort Mishra, Sharmistha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The static Modes of Transmission (MOT) model predicts the annual fraction of new HIV infections acquired across subgroups (MOT metric), and is used to focus HIV prevention. Using synthetic epidemics via a dynamical model, we assessed the validity of the MOT metric for identifying epidemic drivers (behaviours or subgroups that are sufficient and necessary for HIV to establish and persist), and the potential consequence of MOT-guided policies. METHODS AND FINDINGS: To generate benchmark MOT metrics for comparison, we simulated three synthetic epidemics (concentrated, mixed, and generalized) with different epidemic drivers using a dynamical model of heterosexual HIV transmission. MOT metrics from generic and complex MOT models were compared against the benchmark, and to the contribution of epidemic drivers to overall HIV transmission (cumulative population attributable fraction over t years, PAF(t)). The complex MOT metric was similar to the benchmark, but the generic MOT underestimated the fraction of infections in epidemic drivers. The benchmark MOT metric identified epidemic drivers early in the epidemics. Over time, the MOT metric did not identify epidemic drivers. This was not due to simplified MOT models or biased parameters but occurred because the MOT metric (irrespective of the model used to generate it) underestimates the contribution of epidemic drivers to HIV transmission over time (PAF(5–30)). MOT-directed policies that fail to reach epidemic drivers could undermine long-term impact on HIV incidence, and achieve a similar impact as random allocation of additional resources. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of how it is obtained, the MOT metric is not a valid stand-alone tool to identify epidemic drivers, and has limited additional value in guiding the prioritization of HIV prevention targets. Policy-makers should use the MOT model judiciously, in combination with other approaches, to identify epidemic drivers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4090151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40901512014-07-14 Validation of the Modes of Transmission Model as a Tool to Prioritize HIV Prevention Targets: A Comparative Modelling Analysis Mishra, Sharmistha Pickles, Michael Blanchard, James F. Moses, Stephen Shubber, Zara Boily, Marie-Claude PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The static Modes of Transmission (MOT) model predicts the annual fraction of new HIV infections acquired across subgroups (MOT metric), and is used to focus HIV prevention. Using synthetic epidemics via a dynamical model, we assessed the validity of the MOT metric for identifying epidemic drivers (behaviours or subgroups that are sufficient and necessary for HIV to establish and persist), and the potential consequence of MOT-guided policies. METHODS AND FINDINGS: To generate benchmark MOT metrics for comparison, we simulated three synthetic epidemics (concentrated, mixed, and generalized) with different epidemic drivers using a dynamical model of heterosexual HIV transmission. MOT metrics from generic and complex MOT models were compared against the benchmark, and to the contribution of epidemic drivers to overall HIV transmission (cumulative population attributable fraction over t years, PAF(t)). The complex MOT metric was similar to the benchmark, but the generic MOT underestimated the fraction of infections in epidemic drivers. The benchmark MOT metric identified epidemic drivers early in the epidemics. Over time, the MOT metric did not identify epidemic drivers. This was not due to simplified MOT models or biased parameters but occurred because the MOT metric (irrespective of the model used to generate it) underestimates the contribution of epidemic drivers to HIV transmission over time (PAF(5–30)). MOT-directed policies that fail to reach epidemic drivers could undermine long-term impact on HIV incidence, and achieve a similar impact as random allocation of additional resources. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of how it is obtained, the MOT metric is not a valid stand-alone tool to identify epidemic drivers, and has limited additional value in guiding the prioritization of HIV prevention targets. Policy-makers should use the MOT model judiciously, in combination with other approaches, to identify epidemic drivers. Public Library of Science 2014-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4090151/ /pubmed/25014543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101690 Text en © 2014 Mishra et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mishra, Sharmistha
Pickles, Michael
Blanchard, James F.
Moses, Stephen
Shubber, Zara
Boily, Marie-Claude
Validation of the Modes of Transmission Model as a Tool to Prioritize HIV Prevention Targets: A Comparative Modelling Analysis
title Validation of the Modes of Transmission Model as a Tool to Prioritize HIV Prevention Targets: A Comparative Modelling Analysis
title_full Validation of the Modes of Transmission Model as a Tool to Prioritize HIV Prevention Targets: A Comparative Modelling Analysis
title_fullStr Validation of the Modes of Transmission Model as a Tool to Prioritize HIV Prevention Targets: A Comparative Modelling Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Modes of Transmission Model as a Tool to Prioritize HIV Prevention Targets: A Comparative Modelling Analysis
title_short Validation of the Modes of Transmission Model as a Tool to Prioritize HIV Prevention Targets: A Comparative Modelling Analysis
title_sort validation of the modes of transmission model as a tool to prioritize hiv prevention targets: a comparative modelling analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4090151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25014543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101690
work_keys_str_mv AT mishrasharmistha validationofthemodesoftransmissionmodelasatooltoprioritizehivpreventiontargetsacomparativemodellinganalysis
AT picklesmichael validationofthemodesoftransmissionmodelasatooltoprioritizehivpreventiontargetsacomparativemodellinganalysis
AT blanchardjamesf validationofthemodesoftransmissionmodelasatooltoprioritizehivpreventiontargetsacomparativemodellinganalysis
AT mosesstephen validationofthemodesoftransmissionmodelasatooltoprioritizehivpreventiontargetsacomparativemodellinganalysis
AT shubberzara validationofthemodesoftransmissionmodelasatooltoprioritizehivpreventiontargetsacomparativemodellinganalysis
AT boilymarieclaude validationofthemodesoftransmissionmodelasatooltoprioritizehivpreventiontargetsacomparativemodellinganalysis