Cargando…
White blood cell differential counts in severely leukopenic samples: a comparative analysis of different solutions available in modern laboratory hematology
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy of white blood cell (WBC) differential counts in severely leukopenic samples by the Hematoflow method and by automated hematology analyzers and compared the results with manual counts. METHODS: EDTA-anticoagulated blood samples (175 samples) with WBC counts of 4...
Autores principales: | Kim, Ah Hyun, Lee, Wonbae, Kim, Myungshin, Kim, Yonggoo, Han, Kyungja |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Hematology; Korean Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation; Korean Society of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology; Korean Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4090333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25025014 http://dx.doi.org/10.5045/br.2014.49.2.120 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reliable, Accurate Determination of the Leukocyte Differential of Leukopenic Samples by Using Hematoflow Method
por: Jo, Yongjun, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Flow Cytometric White Blood Cell Differential Using CytoDiff is Excellent for Counting Blasts
por: Kahng, Jimin, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Correction of Pseudoreticulocytosis in Leukocytosis Samples Using the Sysmex XE-2100 Analyzer Depends on the Type and Number of White Blood Cells
por: Kim, Ahhyun, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Digital Morphology Analyzer Sysmex DI-60 vs. Manual Counting for White Blood Cell Differentials in Leukopenic Samples: A Comparative Assessment of Risk and Turnaround Time
por: Nam, Minjeong, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples?
por: Yoon, Sumi, et al.
Publicado: (2021)