Cargando…

Diffusion Imaging of Auditory and Auditory-Limbic Connectivity in Tinnitus: Preliminary Evidence and Methodological Challenges

Subjective tinnitus, or “ringing in the ears,” is perceived by 10 to 15 percent of the adult population and causes significant suffering in a subset of patients. While it was originally thought of as a purely auditory phenomenon, there is increasing evidence that the limbic system influences whether...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seydell-Greenwald, Anna, Raven, Erika P., Leaver, Amber M., Turesky, Ted K., Rauschecker, Josef P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4090469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25050181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/145943
_version_ 1782480639687131136
author Seydell-Greenwald, Anna
Raven, Erika P.
Leaver, Amber M.
Turesky, Ted K.
Rauschecker, Josef P.
author_facet Seydell-Greenwald, Anna
Raven, Erika P.
Leaver, Amber M.
Turesky, Ted K.
Rauschecker, Josef P.
author_sort Seydell-Greenwald, Anna
collection PubMed
description Subjective tinnitus, or “ringing in the ears,” is perceived by 10 to 15 percent of the adult population and causes significant suffering in a subset of patients. While it was originally thought of as a purely auditory phenomenon, there is increasing evidence that the limbic system influences whether and how tinnitus is perceived, far beyond merely determining the patient's emotional reaction to the phantom sound. Based on functional imaging and electrophysiological data, recent articles frame tinnitus as a “network problem” arising from abnormalities in auditory-limbic interactions. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is a noninvasive method for investigating anatomical connections in vivo. It thus has the potential to provide anatomical evidence for the proposed changes in auditory-limbic connectivity. However, the few diffusion imaging studies of tinnitus performed to date have inconsistent results. In the present paper, we briefly summarize the results of previous studies, aiming to reconcile their results. After detailing analysis methods, we then report findings from a new dataset. We conclude that while there is some evidence for tinnitus-related increases in auditory and auditory-limbic connectivity that counteract hearing-loss related decreases in auditory connectivity, these results should be considered preliminary until several technical challenges have been overcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4090469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40904692014-07-21 Diffusion Imaging of Auditory and Auditory-Limbic Connectivity in Tinnitus: Preliminary Evidence and Methodological Challenges Seydell-Greenwald, Anna Raven, Erika P. Leaver, Amber M. Turesky, Ted K. Rauschecker, Josef P. Neural Plast Research Article Subjective tinnitus, or “ringing in the ears,” is perceived by 10 to 15 percent of the adult population and causes significant suffering in a subset of patients. While it was originally thought of as a purely auditory phenomenon, there is increasing evidence that the limbic system influences whether and how tinnitus is perceived, far beyond merely determining the patient's emotional reaction to the phantom sound. Based on functional imaging and electrophysiological data, recent articles frame tinnitus as a “network problem” arising from abnormalities in auditory-limbic interactions. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is a noninvasive method for investigating anatomical connections in vivo. It thus has the potential to provide anatomical evidence for the proposed changes in auditory-limbic connectivity. However, the few diffusion imaging studies of tinnitus performed to date have inconsistent results. In the present paper, we briefly summarize the results of previous studies, aiming to reconcile their results. After detailing analysis methods, we then report findings from a new dataset. We conclude that while there is some evidence for tinnitus-related increases in auditory and auditory-limbic connectivity that counteract hearing-loss related decreases in auditory connectivity, these results should be considered preliminary until several technical challenges have been overcome. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4090469/ /pubmed/25050181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/145943 Text en Copyright © 2014 Anna Seydell-Greenwald et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Seydell-Greenwald, Anna
Raven, Erika P.
Leaver, Amber M.
Turesky, Ted K.
Rauschecker, Josef P.
Diffusion Imaging of Auditory and Auditory-Limbic Connectivity in Tinnitus: Preliminary Evidence and Methodological Challenges
title Diffusion Imaging of Auditory and Auditory-Limbic Connectivity in Tinnitus: Preliminary Evidence and Methodological Challenges
title_full Diffusion Imaging of Auditory and Auditory-Limbic Connectivity in Tinnitus: Preliminary Evidence and Methodological Challenges
title_fullStr Diffusion Imaging of Auditory and Auditory-Limbic Connectivity in Tinnitus: Preliminary Evidence and Methodological Challenges
title_full_unstemmed Diffusion Imaging of Auditory and Auditory-Limbic Connectivity in Tinnitus: Preliminary Evidence and Methodological Challenges
title_short Diffusion Imaging of Auditory and Auditory-Limbic Connectivity in Tinnitus: Preliminary Evidence and Methodological Challenges
title_sort diffusion imaging of auditory and auditory-limbic connectivity in tinnitus: preliminary evidence and methodological challenges
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4090469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25050181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/145943
work_keys_str_mv AT seydellgreenwaldanna diffusionimagingofauditoryandauditorylimbicconnectivityintinnituspreliminaryevidenceandmethodologicalchallenges
AT ravenerikap diffusionimagingofauditoryandauditorylimbicconnectivityintinnituspreliminaryevidenceandmethodologicalchallenges
AT leaveramberm diffusionimagingofauditoryandauditorylimbicconnectivityintinnituspreliminaryevidenceandmethodologicalchallenges
AT tureskytedk diffusionimagingofauditoryandauditorylimbicconnectivityintinnituspreliminaryevidenceandmethodologicalchallenges
AT rauscheckerjosefp diffusionimagingofauditoryandauditorylimbicconnectivityintinnituspreliminaryevidenceandmethodologicalchallenges