Cargando…
Randomised proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling vs conventional therapy in patients with refractory cancer: results of the feasibility part of the SHIVA trial
BACKGROUND: The SHIVA trial is a multicentric randomised proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling vs conventional therapy in patients with any type of refractory cancer. Results of the feasibility study on the first 100 enrolled patie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4090722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24762958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.211 |
_version_ | 1782480687191818240 |
---|---|
author | Le Tourneau, C Paoletti, X Servant, N Bièche, I Gentien, D Rio Frio, T Vincent-Salomon, A Servois, V Romejon, J Mariani, O Bernard, V Huppe, P Pierron, G Mulot, F Callens, C Wong, J Mauborgne, C Rouleau, E Reyes, C Henry, E Leroy, Q Gestraud, P La Rosa, P Escalup, L Mitry, E Trédan, O Delord, J-P Campone, M Goncalves, A Isambert, N Gavoille, C Kamal, M |
author_facet | Le Tourneau, C Paoletti, X Servant, N Bièche, I Gentien, D Rio Frio, T Vincent-Salomon, A Servois, V Romejon, J Mariani, O Bernard, V Huppe, P Pierron, G Mulot, F Callens, C Wong, J Mauborgne, C Rouleau, E Reyes, C Henry, E Leroy, Q Gestraud, P La Rosa, P Escalup, L Mitry, E Trédan, O Delord, J-P Campone, M Goncalves, A Isambert, N Gavoille, C Kamal, M |
author_sort | Le Tourneau, C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The SHIVA trial is a multicentric randomised proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling vs conventional therapy in patients with any type of refractory cancer. Results of the feasibility study on the first 100 enrolled patients are presented. METHODS: Adult patients with any type of metastatic cancer who failed standard therapy were eligible for the study. The molecular profile was performed on a mandatory biopsy, and included mutations and gene copy number alteration analyses using high-throughput technologies, as well as the determination of oestrogen, progesterone, and androgen receptors by immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: Biopsy was safely performed in 95 of the first 100 included patients. Median time between the biopsy and the therapeutic decision taken during a weekly molecular biology board was 26 days. Mutations, gene copy number alterations, and IHC analyses were successful in 63 (66%), 65 (68%), and 87 (92%) patients, respectively. A druggable molecular abnormality was present in 38 patients (40%). CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of a comprehensive tumour molecular profile was safe, feasible, and compatible with clinical practice in refractory cancer patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4090722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40907222015-07-01 Randomised proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling vs conventional therapy in patients with refractory cancer: results of the feasibility part of the SHIVA trial Le Tourneau, C Paoletti, X Servant, N Bièche, I Gentien, D Rio Frio, T Vincent-Salomon, A Servois, V Romejon, J Mariani, O Bernard, V Huppe, P Pierron, G Mulot, F Callens, C Wong, J Mauborgne, C Rouleau, E Reyes, C Henry, E Leroy, Q Gestraud, P La Rosa, P Escalup, L Mitry, E Trédan, O Delord, J-P Campone, M Goncalves, A Isambert, N Gavoille, C Kamal, M Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: The SHIVA trial is a multicentric randomised proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling vs conventional therapy in patients with any type of refractory cancer. Results of the feasibility study on the first 100 enrolled patients are presented. METHODS: Adult patients with any type of metastatic cancer who failed standard therapy were eligible for the study. The molecular profile was performed on a mandatory biopsy, and included mutations and gene copy number alteration analyses using high-throughput technologies, as well as the determination of oestrogen, progesterone, and androgen receptors by immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: Biopsy was safely performed in 95 of the first 100 included patients. Median time between the biopsy and the therapeutic decision taken during a weekly molecular biology board was 26 days. Mutations, gene copy number alterations, and IHC analyses were successful in 63 (66%), 65 (68%), and 87 (92%) patients, respectively. A druggable molecular abnormality was present in 38 patients (40%). CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of a comprehensive tumour molecular profile was safe, feasible, and compatible with clinical practice in refractory cancer patients. Nature Publishing Group 2014-07-01 2014-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4090722/ /pubmed/24762958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.211 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Le Tourneau, C Paoletti, X Servant, N Bièche, I Gentien, D Rio Frio, T Vincent-Salomon, A Servois, V Romejon, J Mariani, O Bernard, V Huppe, P Pierron, G Mulot, F Callens, C Wong, J Mauborgne, C Rouleau, E Reyes, C Henry, E Leroy, Q Gestraud, P La Rosa, P Escalup, L Mitry, E Trédan, O Delord, J-P Campone, M Goncalves, A Isambert, N Gavoille, C Kamal, M Randomised proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling vs conventional therapy in patients with refractory cancer: results of the feasibility part of the SHIVA trial |
title | Randomised proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling vs conventional therapy in patients with refractory cancer: results of the feasibility part of the SHIVA trial |
title_full | Randomised proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling vs conventional therapy in patients with refractory cancer: results of the feasibility part of the SHIVA trial |
title_fullStr | Randomised proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling vs conventional therapy in patients with refractory cancer: results of the feasibility part of the SHIVA trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomised proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling vs conventional therapy in patients with refractory cancer: results of the feasibility part of the SHIVA trial |
title_short | Randomised proof-of-concept phase II trial comparing targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling vs conventional therapy in patients with refractory cancer: results of the feasibility part of the SHIVA trial |
title_sort | randomised proof-of-concept phase ii trial comparing targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling vs conventional therapy in patients with refractory cancer: results of the feasibility part of the shiva trial |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4090722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24762958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.211 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT letourneauc randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT paolettix randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT servantn randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT biechei randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT gentiend randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT riofriot randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT vincentsalomona randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT servoisv randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT romejonj randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT marianio randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT bernardv randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT huppep randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT pierrong randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT mulotf randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT callensc randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT wongj randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT mauborgnec randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT rouleaue randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT reyesc randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT henrye randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT leroyq randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT gestraudp randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT larosap randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT escalupl randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT mitrye randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT tredano randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT delordjp randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT camponem randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT goncalvesa randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT isambertn randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT gavoillec randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial AT kamalm randomisedproofofconceptphaseiitrialcomparingtargetedtherapybasedontumourmolecularprofilingvsconventionaltherapyinpatientswithrefractorycancerresultsofthefeasibilitypartoftheshivatrial |