Cargando…

Comparisons between prosthetic vascular graft and saphenous vein graft in femoro-popliteal bypass

PURPOSE: Infrainguinalfemoropopliteal bypass (IFPB) is recommended to peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with a long occlusion of the superficial femoral artery (SFA). The aims of our study were to determine the patency of graft materials, and identify the risk factors of graft failure. METHODS: From...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Keun-Myoung, Kim, Young Wook, Yang, Shin-Seok, Kim, Dong-Ik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Surgical Society 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4091446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25025025
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2014.87.1.35
_version_ 1782480766911905792
author Park, Keun-Myoung
Kim, Young Wook
Yang, Shin-Seok
Kim, Dong-Ik
author_facet Park, Keun-Myoung
Kim, Young Wook
Yang, Shin-Seok
Kim, Dong-Ik
author_sort Park, Keun-Myoung
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Infrainguinalfemoropopliteal bypass (IFPB) is recommended to peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with a long occlusion of the superficial femoral artery (SFA). The aims of our study were to determine the patency of graft materials, and identify the risk factors of graft failure. METHODS: From January 1995 to April 2011, we had performed 380 IFPBs in 351 patients, including 302 femoro-above the knee (AK) bypasses and 78 femoro-below the knee (BK) bypasses. We compare age, sex, severity of ischemia between polytetra-uoroethylene (PTFE) graft and saphenous vein (SV) graft, and evaluate patency rate rates of the two groups. RESULTS: The primary patency rates at 5 years for SV (n = 76 limbs) and PTFE grafts (n = 226 limbs) in AK were 85.2% and 64.5% (log rank = 0.03), and the secondary patency rates at 5 years for SV and PTFE grafts in AK were 88.2% and 79.0% (log rank = 0.13). The primary patency rates at 5 years for SV (n = 50 limbs) and PTFE grafts (n = 28 limbs) in BK were 63.2% and 40.0% (log rank = 0.08), and the secondary patency rates at 5 years for SV and PTFE grafts in BK were 71.6% and 55.5% (log rank = 0.18). CONCLUSION: There was no statistical significant difference in secondary patency rates between SV and PTFE in IFPB. PTFE grafts as SV grafts can be a good alternative bypass material in IFPB instead of SV grafts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4091446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Surgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40914462014-07-14 Comparisons between prosthetic vascular graft and saphenous vein graft in femoro-popliteal bypass Park, Keun-Myoung Kim, Young Wook Yang, Shin-Seok Kim, Dong-Ik Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: Infrainguinalfemoropopliteal bypass (IFPB) is recommended to peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with a long occlusion of the superficial femoral artery (SFA). The aims of our study were to determine the patency of graft materials, and identify the risk factors of graft failure. METHODS: From January 1995 to April 2011, we had performed 380 IFPBs in 351 patients, including 302 femoro-above the knee (AK) bypasses and 78 femoro-below the knee (BK) bypasses. We compare age, sex, severity of ischemia between polytetra-uoroethylene (PTFE) graft and saphenous vein (SV) graft, and evaluate patency rate rates of the two groups. RESULTS: The primary patency rates at 5 years for SV (n = 76 limbs) and PTFE grafts (n = 226 limbs) in AK were 85.2% and 64.5% (log rank = 0.03), and the secondary patency rates at 5 years for SV and PTFE grafts in AK were 88.2% and 79.0% (log rank = 0.13). The primary patency rates at 5 years for SV (n = 50 limbs) and PTFE grafts (n = 28 limbs) in BK were 63.2% and 40.0% (log rank = 0.08), and the secondary patency rates at 5 years for SV and PTFE grafts in BK were 71.6% and 55.5% (log rank = 0.18). CONCLUSION: There was no statistical significant difference in secondary patency rates between SV and PTFE in IFPB. PTFE grafts as SV grafts can be a good alternative bypass material in IFPB instead of SV grafts. The Korean Surgical Society 2014-07 2014-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4091446/ /pubmed/25025025 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2014.87.1.35 Text en Copyright © 2014, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Keun-Myoung
Kim, Young Wook
Yang, Shin-Seok
Kim, Dong-Ik
Comparisons between prosthetic vascular graft and saphenous vein graft in femoro-popliteal bypass
title Comparisons between prosthetic vascular graft and saphenous vein graft in femoro-popliteal bypass
title_full Comparisons between prosthetic vascular graft and saphenous vein graft in femoro-popliteal bypass
title_fullStr Comparisons between prosthetic vascular graft and saphenous vein graft in femoro-popliteal bypass
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons between prosthetic vascular graft and saphenous vein graft in femoro-popliteal bypass
title_short Comparisons between prosthetic vascular graft and saphenous vein graft in femoro-popliteal bypass
title_sort comparisons between prosthetic vascular graft and saphenous vein graft in femoro-popliteal bypass
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4091446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25025025
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2014.87.1.35
work_keys_str_mv AT parkkeunmyoung comparisonsbetweenprostheticvasculargraftandsaphenousveingraftinfemoropoplitealbypass
AT kimyoungwook comparisonsbetweenprostheticvasculargraftandsaphenousveingraftinfemoropoplitealbypass
AT yangshinseok comparisonsbetweenprostheticvasculargraftandsaphenousveingraftinfemoropoplitealbypass
AT kimdongik comparisonsbetweenprostheticvasculargraftandsaphenousveingraftinfemoropoplitealbypass