Cargando…

A Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets using Conventional Acid Etching Technique and Er:YAG Laser Etching

Background and aims. The aim of this study was to compare shear bond strength (SBS) of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to enamel using acid versus Er:YAG laser etching. Materials and methods. Eighty premolars were divided into 4 groups: AM (acid etching/ metal brackets), AC (acid etching/ ceramic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yassaei, Sogra, Fekrazad, Reza, Shahraki, Neda, Goldani Moghadam, Mahdjoube
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4091696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25024836
http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2014.005
_version_ 1782480793670516736
author Yassaei, Sogra
Fekrazad, Reza
Shahraki, Neda
Goldani Moghadam, Mahdjoube
author_facet Yassaei, Sogra
Fekrazad, Reza
Shahraki, Neda
Goldani Moghadam, Mahdjoube
author_sort Yassaei, Sogra
collection PubMed
description Background and aims. The aim of this study was to compare shear bond strength (SBS) of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to enamel using acid versus Er:YAG laser etching. Materials and methods. Eighty premolars were divided into 4 groups: AM (acid etching/ metal brackets), AC (acid etching/ ceramic brackets), LM (laser etching/ metal brackets) and LC (laser etching/ ceramic brackets). Enamel condition-ing was done using acid in AC and AM and Er:YAG laser in LC and LM. Brackets were debonded with a Dartec machine and the SBSs were determined. Adhesive remnant index was evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Two additional teeth were conditioned with acid and laser for scanning electron microscopy examination. Comparisons of SBS value were done by ANOVA test. Results. statistical analyses showed that SBSs of acid groups were significantly higher than that of laser groups, but dif-ferences between SBS values of AC/ AM and LC/LM were not significant. SEM examination revealed different etching pattern. Conclusion. Low power Er:YAG laser etching offers clinically acceptable SBS which besides its other superiorities to acid etching can be an appropriate alternative for bonding of ceramic brackets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4091696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40916962014-07-14 A Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets using Conventional Acid Etching Technique and Er:YAG Laser Etching Yassaei, Sogra Fekrazad, Reza Shahraki, Neda Goldani Moghadam, Mahdjoube J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background and aims. The aim of this study was to compare shear bond strength (SBS) of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to enamel using acid versus Er:YAG laser etching. Materials and methods. Eighty premolars were divided into 4 groups: AM (acid etching/ metal brackets), AC (acid etching/ ceramic brackets), LM (laser etching/ metal brackets) and LC (laser etching/ ceramic brackets). Enamel condition-ing was done using acid in AC and AM and Er:YAG laser in LC and LM. Brackets were debonded with a Dartec machine and the SBSs were determined. Adhesive remnant index was evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Two additional teeth were conditioned with acid and laser for scanning electron microscopy examination. Comparisons of SBS value were done by ANOVA test. Results. statistical analyses showed that SBSs of acid groups were significantly higher than that of laser groups, but dif-ferences between SBS values of AC/ AM and LC/LM were not significant. SEM examination revealed different etching pattern. Conclusion. Low power Er:YAG laser etching offers clinically acceptable SBS which besides its other superiorities to acid etching can be an appropriate alternative for bonding of ceramic brackets. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2014 2014-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4091696/ /pubmed/25024836 http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2014.005 Text en © 2014 The Authors; Tabriz University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yassaei, Sogra
Fekrazad, Reza
Shahraki, Neda
Goldani Moghadam, Mahdjoube
A Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets using Conventional Acid Etching Technique and Er:YAG Laser Etching
title A Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets using Conventional Acid Etching Technique and Er:YAG Laser Etching
title_full A Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets using Conventional Acid Etching Technique and Er:YAG Laser Etching
title_fullStr A Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets using Conventional Acid Etching Technique and Er:YAG Laser Etching
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets using Conventional Acid Etching Technique and Er:YAG Laser Etching
title_short A Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets using Conventional Acid Etching Technique and Er:YAG Laser Etching
title_sort comparison of shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets using conventional acid etching technique and er:yag laser etching
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4091696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25024836
http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2014.005
work_keys_str_mv AT yassaeisogra acomparisonofshearbondstrengthsofmetalandceramicbracketsusingconventionalacidetchingtechniqueanderyaglaseretching
AT fekrazadreza acomparisonofshearbondstrengthsofmetalandceramicbracketsusingconventionalacidetchingtechniqueanderyaglaseretching
AT shahrakineda acomparisonofshearbondstrengthsofmetalandceramicbracketsusingconventionalacidetchingtechniqueanderyaglaseretching
AT goldanimoghadammahdjoube acomparisonofshearbondstrengthsofmetalandceramicbracketsusingconventionalacidetchingtechniqueanderyaglaseretching
AT yassaeisogra comparisonofshearbondstrengthsofmetalandceramicbracketsusingconventionalacidetchingtechniqueanderyaglaseretching
AT fekrazadreza comparisonofshearbondstrengthsofmetalandceramicbracketsusingconventionalacidetchingtechniqueanderyaglaseretching
AT shahrakineda comparisonofshearbondstrengthsofmetalandceramicbracketsusingconventionalacidetchingtechniqueanderyaglaseretching
AT goldanimoghadammahdjoube comparisonofshearbondstrengthsofmetalandceramicbracketsusingconventionalacidetchingtechniqueanderyaglaseretching