Cargando…
A Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets using Conventional Acid Etching Technique and Er:YAG Laser Etching
Background and aims. The aim of this study was to compare shear bond strength (SBS) of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to enamel using acid versus Er:YAG laser etching. Materials and methods. Eighty premolars were divided into 4 groups: AM (acid etching/ metal brackets), AC (acid etching/ ceramic...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4091696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25024836 http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2014.005 |
_version_ | 1782480793670516736 |
---|---|
author | Yassaei, Sogra Fekrazad, Reza Shahraki, Neda Goldani Moghadam, Mahdjoube |
author_facet | Yassaei, Sogra Fekrazad, Reza Shahraki, Neda Goldani Moghadam, Mahdjoube |
author_sort | Yassaei, Sogra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and aims. The aim of this study was to compare shear bond strength (SBS) of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to enamel using acid versus Er:YAG laser etching. Materials and methods. Eighty premolars were divided into 4 groups: AM (acid etching/ metal brackets), AC (acid etching/ ceramic brackets), LM (laser etching/ metal brackets) and LC (laser etching/ ceramic brackets). Enamel condition-ing was done using acid in AC and AM and Er:YAG laser in LC and LM. Brackets were debonded with a Dartec machine and the SBSs were determined. Adhesive remnant index was evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Two additional teeth were conditioned with acid and laser for scanning electron microscopy examination. Comparisons of SBS value were done by ANOVA test. Results. statistical analyses showed that SBSs of acid groups were significantly higher than that of laser groups, but dif-ferences between SBS values of AC/ AM and LC/LM were not significant. SEM examination revealed different etching pattern. Conclusion. Low power Er:YAG laser etching offers clinically acceptable SBS which besides its other superiorities to acid etching can be an appropriate alternative for bonding of ceramic brackets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4091696 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Tabriz University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40916962014-07-14 A Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets using Conventional Acid Etching Technique and Er:YAG Laser Etching Yassaei, Sogra Fekrazad, Reza Shahraki, Neda Goldani Moghadam, Mahdjoube J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background and aims. The aim of this study was to compare shear bond strength (SBS) of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to enamel using acid versus Er:YAG laser etching. Materials and methods. Eighty premolars were divided into 4 groups: AM (acid etching/ metal brackets), AC (acid etching/ ceramic brackets), LM (laser etching/ metal brackets) and LC (laser etching/ ceramic brackets). Enamel condition-ing was done using acid in AC and AM and Er:YAG laser in LC and LM. Brackets were debonded with a Dartec machine and the SBSs were determined. Adhesive remnant index was evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Two additional teeth were conditioned with acid and laser for scanning electron microscopy examination. Comparisons of SBS value were done by ANOVA test. Results. statistical analyses showed that SBSs of acid groups were significantly higher than that of laser groups, but dif-ferences between SBS values of AC/ AM and LC/LM were not significant. SEM examination revealed different etching pattern. Conclusion. Low power Er:YAG laser etching offers clinically acceptable SBS which besides its other superiorities to acid etching can be an appropriate alternative for bonding of ceramic brackets. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2014 2014-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4091696/ /pubmed/25024836 http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2014.005 Text en © 2014 The Authors; Tabriz University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yassaei, Sogra Fekrazad, Reza Shahraki, Neda Goldani Moghadam, Mahdjoube A Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets using Conventional Acid Etching Technique and Er:YAG Laser Etching |
title | A Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets using Conventional Acid Etching Technique and Er:YAG Laser Etching |
title_full | A Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets using Conventional Acid Etching Technique and Er:YAG Laser Etching |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets using Conventional Acid Etching Technique and Er:YAG Laser Etching |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets using Conventional Acid Etching Technique and Er:YAG Laser Etching |
title_short | A Comparison of Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets using Conventional Acid Etching Technique and Er:YAG Laser Etching |
title_sort | comparison of shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets using conventional acid etching technique and er:yag laser etching |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4091696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25024836 http://dx.doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2014.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yassaeisogra acomparisonofshearbondstrengthsofmetalandceramicbracketsusingconventionalacidetchingtechniqueanderyaglaseretching AT fekrazadreza acomparisonofshearbondstrengthsofmetalandceramicbracketsusingconventionalacidetchingtechniqueanderyaglaseretching AT shahrakineda acomparisonofshearbondstrengthsofmetalandceramicbracketsusingconventionalacidetchingtechniqueanderyaglaseretching AT goldanimoghadammahdjoube acomparisonofshearbondstrengthsofmetalandceramicbracketsusingconventionalacidetchingtechniqueanderyaglaseretching AT yassaeisogra comparisonofshearbondstrengthsofmetalandceramicbracketsusingconventionalacidetchingtechniqueanderyaglaseretching AT fekrazadreza comparisonofshearbondstrengthsofmetalandceramicbracketsusingconventionalacidetchingtechniqueanderyaglaseretching AT shahrakineda comparisonofshearbondstrengthsofmetalandceramicbracketsusingconventionalacidetchingtechniqueanderyaglaseretching AT goldanimoghadammahdjoube comparisonofshearbondstrengthsofmetalandceramicbracketsusingconventionalacidetchingtechniqueanderyaglaseretching |