Cargando…

Some Are More Equal - A Comparative Study on Swab Uptake and Release of Bacterial Suspensions

OBJECTIVES: Swabs are widely used to collect samples for microbiological analyses from various clinical settings. They vary by material, size, and structure of the tip. This study investigates the uptake and release capacities for liquid and bacteria. METHODS: Five swabs were analyzed for their upta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Warnke, Philipp, Warning, Liesa, Podbielski, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4092111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25010422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102215
_version_ 1782480838383894528
author Warnke, Philipp
Warning, Liesa
Podbielski, Andreas
author_facet Warnke, Philipp
Warning, Liesa
Podbielski, Andreas
author_sort Warnke, Philipp
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Swabs are widely used to collect samples for microbiological analyses from various clinical settings. They vary by material, size, and structure of the tip. This study investigates the uptake and release capacities for liquid and bacteria. METHODS: Five swabs were analyzed for their uptake and release capacities of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis suspensions. Two approaches were investigated providing volume-restricted and unrestricted amounts of bacterial suspensions to mimic various clinical situations. Volume and bacterial uptake and release were measured in milligrams and by counting colony forming units (CFU), respectively. RESULTS: Volume uptake and release in the unrestricted setting varied highly significant between 239.6 mg and 88.7 mg (p<0.001) and between 65.2 mg and 2.2 mg (p<0.001), respectively. In the volume-restricted setting the complete volume was absorbed by all swabs, volume release could only be detected for flocked swabs (2.7 mg; p<0.001). Highest amount of CFU release was detected for the MWE Dryswab in the unrestricted setting for both S. aureus and S. epidermidis with 1544 CFU and 553 CFU, respectively, lowest release for the Sarstedt neutral swab with 32 CFU and 17 CFU, respectively (p<0.001). In the volume-restricted setting MWE Σ-Swab released the highest bacterial amount with 135 CFU S. aureus and 55 CFU S. epidermidis, respectively, the lowest amount was released by Mast Mastaswab with 2 CFU S. aureus and 1 CFU S. epidermidis, respectively (p<0.001). Within the range of the utilized bacterial concentrations, uptake/release ratios were identical for the particular swab types and independent of the bacterial species. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of the swab type on subsequent diagnostic results is often underestimated. Uptake and release of the investigated bacteria vary significantly between different swab types and sampling conditions. For best diagnostic outcome swabs should be chosen according to the examined situation and the swab performance profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4092111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40921112014-07-18 Some Are More Equal - A Comparative Study on Swab Uptake and Release of Bacterial Suspensions Warnke, Philipp Warning, Liesa Podbielski, Andreas PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: Swabs are widely used to collect samples for microbiological analyses from various clinical settings. They vary by material, size, and structure of the tip. This study investigates the uptake and release capacities for liquid and bacteria. METHODS: Five swabs were analyzed for their uptake and release capacities of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis suspensions. Two approaches were investigated providing volume-restricted and unrestricted amounts of bacterial suspensions to mimic various clinical situations. Volume and bacterial uptake and release were measured in milligrams and by counting colony forming units (CFU), respectively. RESULTS: Volume uptake and release in the unrestricted setting varied highly significant between 239.6 mg and 88.7 mg (p<0.001) and between 65.2 mg and 2.2 mg (p<0.001), respectively. In the volume-restricted setting the complete volume was absorbed by all swabs, volume release could only be detected for flocked swabs (2.7 mg; p<0.001). Highest amount of CFU release was detected for the MWE Dryswab in the unrestricted setting for both S. aureus and S. epidermidis with 1544 CFU and 553 CFU, respectively, lowest release for the Sarstedt neutral swab with 32 CFU and 17 CFU, respectively (p<0.001). In the volume-restricted setting MWE Σ-Swab released the highest bacterial amount with 135 CFU S. aureus and 55 CFU S. epidermidis, respectively, the lowest amount was released by Mast Mastaswab with 2 CFU S. aureus and 1 CFU S. epidermidis, respectively (p<0.001). Within the range of the utilized bacterial concentrations, uptake/release ratios were identical for the particular swab types and independent of the bacterial species. CONCLUSIONS: The influence of the swab type on subsequent diagnostic results is often underestimated. Uptake and release of the investigated bacteria vary significantly between different swab types and sampling conditions. For best diagnostic outcome swabs should be chosen according to the examined situation and the swab performance profile. Public Library of Science 2014-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4092111/ /pubmed/25010422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102215 Text en © 2014 Warnke et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Warnke, Philipp
Warning, Liesa
Podbielski, Andreas
Some Are More Equal - A Comparative Study on Swab Uptake and Release of Bacterial Suspensions
title Some Are More Equal - A Comparative Study on Swab Uptake and Release of Bacterial Suspensions
title_full Some Are More Equal - A Comparative Study on Swab Uptake and Release of Bacterial Suspensions
title_fullStr Some Are More Equal - A Comparative Study on Swab Uptake and Release of Bacterial Suspensions
title_full_unstemmed Some Are More Equal - A Comparative Study on Swab Uptake and Release of Bacterial Suspensions
title_short Some Are More Equal - A Comparative Study on Swab Uptake and Release of Bacterial Suspensions
title_sort some are more equal - a comparative study on swab uptake and release of bacterial suspensions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4092111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25010422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102215
work_keys_str_mv AT warnkephilipp somearemoreequalacomparativestudyonswabuptakeandreleaseofbacterialsuspensions
AT warningliesa somearemoreequalacomparativestudyonswabuptakeandreleaseofbacterialsuspensions
AT podbielskiandreas somearemoreequalacomparativestudyonswabuptakeandreleaseofbacterialsuspensions