Cargando…

Insights into the Interactions between Maleimide Derivates and GSK3β Combining Molecular Docking and QSAR

Many protein kinase (PK) inhibitors have been reported in recent years, but only a few have been approved for clinical use. The understanding of the available molecular information using computational tools is an alternative to contribute to this process. With this in mind, we studied the binding mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quesada-Romero, Luisa, Mena-Ulecia, Karel, Tiznado, William, Caballero, Julio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4092126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25010341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102212
_version_ 1782325450317496320
author Quesada-Romero, Luisa
Mena-Ulecia, Karel
Tiznado, William
Caballero, Julio
author_facet Quesada-Romero, Luisa
Mena-Ulecia, Karel
Tiznado, William
Caballero, Julio
author_sort Quesada-Romero, Luisa
collection PubMed
description Many protein kinase (PK) inhibitors have been reported in recent years, but only a few have been approved for clinical use. The understanding of the available molecular information using computational tools is an alternative to contribute to this process. With this in mind, we studied the binding modes of 77 maleimide derivates inside the PK glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3β) using docking experiments. We found that the orientations that these compounds adopt inside GSK3β binding site prioritize the formation of hydrogen bond (HB) interactions between the maleimide group and the residues at the hinge region (residues Val135 and Asp133), and adopt propeller-like conformations (where the maleimide is the propeller axis and the heterocyclic substituents are two slanted blades). In addition, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models using CoMSIA methodology were constructed to explain the trend of the GSK3β inhibitory activities for the studied compounds. We found a model to explain the structure–activity relationship of non-cyclic maleimide (NCM) derivatives (54 compounds). The best CoMSIA model (training set included 44 compounds) included steric, hydrophobic, and HB donor fields and had a good Q(2) value of 0.539. It also predicted adequately the most active compounds contained in the test set. Furthermore, the analysis of the plots of the steric CoMSIA field describes the elements involved in the differential potency of the inhibitors that can be considered for the selection of suitable inhibitors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4092126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40921262014-07-18 Insights into the Interactions between Maleimide Derivates and GSK3β Combining Molecular Docking and QSAR Quesada-Romero, Luisa Mena-Ulecia, Karel Tiznado, William Caballero, Julio PLoS One Research Article Many protein kinase (PK) inhibitors have been reported in recent years, but only a few have been approved for clinical use. The understanding of the available molecular information using computational tools is an alternative to contribute to this process. With this in mind, we studied the binding modes of 77 maleimide derivates inside the PK glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3β) using docking experiments. We found that the orientations that these compounds adopt inside GSK3β binding site prioritize the formation of hydrogen bond (HB) interactions between the maleimide group and the residues at the hinge region (residues Val135 and Asp133), and adopt propeller-like conformations (where the maleimide is the propeller axis and the heterocyclic substituents are two slanted blades). In addition, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models using CoMSIA methodology were constructed to explain the trend of the GSK3β inhibitory activities for the studied compounds. We found a model to explain the structure–activity relationship of non-cyclic maleimide (NCM) derivatives (54 compounds). The best CoMSIA model (training set included 44 compounds) included steric, hydrophobic, and HB donor fields and had a good Q(2) value of 0.539. It also predicted adequately the most active compounds contained in the test set. Furthermore, the analysis of the plots of the steric CoMSIA field describes the elements involved in the differential potency of the inhibitors that can be considered for the selection of suitable inhibitors. Public Library of Science 2014-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4092126/ /pubmed/25010341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102212 Text en © 2014 Quesada-Romero et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Quesada-Romero, Luisa
Mena-Ulecia, Karel
Tiznado, William
Caballero, Julio
Insights into the Interactions between Maleimide Derivates and GSK3β Combining Molecular Docking and QSAR
title Insights into the Interactions between Maleimide Derivates and GSK3β Combining Molecular Docking and QSAR
title_full Insights into the Interactions between Maleimide Derivates and GSK3β Combining Molecular Docking and QSAR
title_fullStr Insights into the Interactions between Maleimide Derivates and GSK3β Combining Molecular Docking and QSAR
title_full_unstemmed Insights into the Interactions between Maleimide Derivates and GSK3β Combining Molecular Docking and QSAR
title_short Insights into the Interactions between Maleimide Derivates and GSK3β Combining Molecular Docking and QSAR
title_sort insights into the interactions between maleimide derivates and gsk3β combining molecular docking and qsar
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4092126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25010341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102212
work_keys_str_mv AT quesadaromeroluisa insightsintotheinteractionsbetweenmaleimidederivatesandgsk3bcombiningmoleculardockingandqsar
AT menauleciakarel insightsintotheinteractionsbetweenmaleimidederivatesandgsk3bcombiningmoleculardockingandqsar
AT tiznadowilliam insightsintotheinteractionsbetweenmaleimidederivatesandgsk3bcombiningmoleculardockingandqsar
AT caballerojulio insightsintotheinteractionsbetweenmaleimidederivatesandgsk3bcombiningmoleculardockingandqsar