Cargando…

Interhemispheric Modulation of Dual-Mode, Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Motor Function

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of simultaneous, bihemispheric, dual-mode stimulation using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor functions and cortical excitability in healthy individuals. METHODS: Twenty-five healthy,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Eunhee, Kim, Yun-Hee, Chang, Won Hyuk, Kwon, Tae Gun, Shin, Yong-Il
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4092168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25024951
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.3.297
_version_ 1782325459096174592
author Park, Eunhee
Kim, Yun-Hee
Chang, Won Hyuk
Kwon, Tae Gun
Shin, Yong-Il
author_facet Park, Eunhee
Kim, Yun-Hee
Chang, Won Hyuk
Kwon, Tae Gun
Shin, Yong-Il
author_sort Park, Eunhee
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of simultaneous, bihemispheric, dual-mode stimulation using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor functions and cortical excitability in healthy individuals. METHODS: Twenty-five healthy, right-handed volunteers (10 men, 15 women; mean age, 25.5 years) were enrolled. All participants received four randomly arranged, dual-mode, simultaneous stimulations under the following conditions: condition 1, high-frequency rTMS over the right primary motor cortex (M1) and sham tDCS over the left M1; condition 2, high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 and anodal tDCS over the left M1; condition 3, high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 and cathodal tDCS over the left M1; and condition 4, sham rTMS and sham tDCS. The cortical excitability of the right M1 and motor functions of the left hand were assessed before and after each simulation. RESULTS: Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes after stimulation were significantly higher than before stimulation, under the conditions 1 and 2. The MEP amplitude in condition 2 was higher than both conditions 3 and 4, while the MEP amplitude in condition 1 was higher than condition 4. The results of the Purdue Pegboard test and the box and block test showed significant improvement in conditions 1 and 2 after stimulation. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous stimulation by anodal tDCS over the left M1 with high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 could produce interhemispheric modulation and homeostatic plasticity, which resulted in modulation of cortical excitability and motor functions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4092168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40921682014-07-14 Interhemispheric Modulation of Dual-Mode, Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Motor Function Park, Eunhee Kim, Yun-Hee Chang, Won Hyuk Kwon, Tae Gun Shin, Yong-Il Ann Rehabil Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of simultaneous, bihemispheric, dual-mode stimulation using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor functions and cortical excitability in healthy individuals. METHODS: Twenty-five healthy, right-handed volunteers (10 men, 15 women; mean age, 25.5 years) were enrolled. All participants received four randomly arranged, dual-mode, simultaneous stimulations under the following conditions: condition 1, high-frequency rTMS over the right primary motor cortex (M1) and sham tDCS over the left M1; condition 2, high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 and anodal tDCS over the left M1; condition 3, high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 and cathodal tDCS over the left M1; and condition 4, sham rTMS and sham tDCS. The cortical excitability of the right M1 and motor functions of the left hand were assessed before and after each simulation. RESULTS: Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes after stimulation were significantly higher than before stimulation, under the conditions 1 and 2. The MEP amplitude in condition 2 was higher than both conditions 3 and 4, while the MEP amplitude in condition 1 was higher than condition 4. The results of the Purdue Pegboard test and the box and block test showed significant improvement in conditions 1 and 2 after stimulation. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous stimulation by anodal tDCS over the left M1 with high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 could produce interhemispheric modulation and homeostatic plasticity, which resulted in modulation of cortical excitability and motor functions. Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2014-06 2014-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4092168/ /pubmed/25024951 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.3.297 Text en Copyright © 2014 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Eunhee
Kim, Yun-Hee
Chang, Won Hyuk
Kwon, Tae Gun
Shin, Yong-Il
Interhemispheric Modulation of Dual-Mode, Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Motor Function
title Interhemispheric Modulation of Dual-Mode, Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Motor Function
title_full Interhemispheric Modulation of Dual-Mode, Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Motor Function
title_fullStr Interhemispheric Modulation of Dual-Mode, Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Motor Function
title_full_unstemmed Interhemispheric Modulation of Dual-Mode, Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Motor Function
title_short Interhemispheric Modulation of Dual-Mode, Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Motor Function
title_sort interhemispheric modulation of dual-mode, noninvasive brain stimulation on motor function
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4092168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25024951
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.3.297
work_keys_str_mv AT parkeunhee interhemisphericmodulationofdualmodenoninvasivebrainstimulationonmotorfunction
AT kimyunhee interhemisphericmodulationofdualmodenoninvasivebrainstimulationonmotorfunction
AT changwonhyuk interhemisphericmodulationofdualmodenoninvasivebrainstimulationonmotorfunction
AT kwontaegun interhemisphericmodulationofdualmodenoninvasivebrainstimulationonmotorfunction
AT shinyongil interhemisphericmodulationofdualmodenoninvasivebrainstimulationonmotorfunction