Cargando…
What kind of science for psychiatry?
Psychiatry has invested its hopes in neuroscience as a path to understanding mental disorders and developing more effective treatments and ultimately cures. Recently, the U.S. NIMH has elaborated this vision through a new framework for mental health research, the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). Thi...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4092362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25071499 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00435 |
_version_ | 1782325486107492352 |
---|---|
author | Kirmayer, Laurence J. Crafa, Daina |
author_facet | Kirmayer, Laurence J. Crafa, Daina |
author_sort | Kirmayer, Laurence J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Psychiatry has invested its hopes in neuroscience as a path to understanding mental disorders and developing more effective treatments and ultimately cures. Recently, the U.S. NIMH has elaborated this vision through a new framework for mental health research, the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). This framework aims to orient mental health research toward the discovery of underlying neurobiological and biobehavioral mechanisms of mental disorders that will eventually lead to definitive treatments. In this article we consider the rationale of the RDoC and what it reveals about implicit models of mental disorders. As an overall framework for understanding mental disorders, RDoC is impoverished and conceptually flawed. These limitations are not accidental but stem from disciplinary commitments and interests that are at odds with the larger concerns of psychiatry. A multilevel, ecosocial approach to biobehavioral systems is needed both to guide relevant neuroscience research and insure the inclusion of social processes that may be fundamental contributors to psychopathology and recovery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4092362 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40923622014-07-28 What kind of science for psychiatry? Kirmayer, Laurence J. Crafa, Daina Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Psychiatry has invested its hopes in neuroscience as a path to understanding mental disorders and developing more effective treatments and ultimately cures. Recently, the U.S. NIMH has elaborated this vision through a new framework for mental health research, the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). This framework aims to orient mental health research toward the discovery of underlying neurobiological and biobehavioral mechanisms of mental disorders that will eventually lead to definitive treatments. In this article we consider the rationale of the RDoC and what it reveals about implicit models of mental disorders. As an overall framework for understanding mental disorders, RDoC is impoverished and conceptually flawed. These limitations are not accidental but stem from disciplinary commitments and interests that are at odds with the larger concerns of psychiatry. A multilevel, ecosocial approach to biobehavioral systems is needed both to guide relevant neuroscience research and insure the inclusion of social processes that may be fundamental contributors to psychopathology and recovery. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4092362/ /pubmed/25071499 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00435 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kirmayer and Crafa. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Kirmayer, Laurence J. Crafa, Daina What kind of science for psychiatry? |
title | What kind of science for psychiatry? |
title_full | What kind of science for psychiatry? |
title_fullStr | What kind of science for psychiatry? |
title_full_unstemmed | What kind of science for psychiatry? |
title_short | What kind of science for psychiatry? |
title_sort | what kind of science for psychiatry? |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4092362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25071499 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00435 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kirmayerlaurencej whatkindofscienceforpsychiatry AT crafadaina whatkindofscienceforpsychiatry |