Cargando…
Animal Welfare in Different Human Cultures, Traditions and Religious Faiths
Animal welfare has become a growing concern affecting acceptability of agricultural systems in many countries around the world. An earlier Judeo-Christian interpretation of the Bible (1982) that dominion over animals meant that any degree of exploitation was acceptable has changed for most people to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4093044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25049508 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.r.02 |
_version_ | 1782325639675641856 |
---|---|
author | Szűcs, E. Geers, R. Jezierski, T. Sossidou, E. N. Broom, D. M. |
author_facet | Szűcs, E. Geers, R. Jezierski, T. Sossidou, E. N. Broom, D. M. |
author_sort | Szűcs, E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Animal welfare has become a growing concern affecting acceptability of agricultural systems in many countries around the world. An earlier Judeo-Christian interpretation of the Bible (1982) that dominion over animals meant that any degree of exploitation was acceptable has changed for most people to mean that each person has responsibility for animal welfare. This view was evident in some ancient Greek writings and has parallels in Islamic teaching. A minority view of Christians, which is a widespread view of Jains, Buddhists and many Hindus, is that animals should not be used by humans as food or for other purposes. The commonest philosophical positions now, concerning how animals should be treated, are a blend of deontological and utilitarian approaches. Most people think that extremes of poor welfare in animals are unacceptable and that those who keep animals should strive for good welfare. Hence animal welfare science, which allows the evaluation of welfare, has developed rapidly. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4093044 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40930442014-07-21 Animal Welfare in Different Human Cultures, Traditions and Religious Faiths Szűcs, E. Geers, R. Jezierski, T. Sossidou, E. N. Broom, D. M. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Article Animal welfare has become a growing concern affecting acceptability of agricultural systems in many countries around the world. An earlier Judeo-Christian interpretation of the Bible (1982) that dominion over animals meant that any degree of exploitation was acceptable has changed for most people to mean that each person has responsibility for animal welfare. This view was evident in some ancient Greek writings and has parallels in Islamic teaching. A minority view of Christians, which is a widespread view of Jains, Buddhists and many Hindus, is that animals should not be used by humans as food or for other purposes. The commonest philosophical positions now, concerning how animals should be treated, are a blend of deontological and utilitarian approaches. Most people think that extremes of poor welfare in animals are unacceptable and that those who keep animals should strive for good welfare. Hence animal welfare science, which allows the evaluation of welfare, has developed rapidly. Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2012-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4093044/ /pubmed/25049508 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.r.02 Text en Copyright © 2012 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Szűcs, E. Geers, R. Jezierski, T. Sossidou, E. N. Broom, D. M. Animal Welfare in Different Human Cultures, Traditions and Religious Faiths |
title | Animal Welfare in Different Human Cultures, Traditions and Religious Faiths |
title_full | Animal Welfare in Different Human Cultures, Traditions and Religious Faiths |
title_fullStr | Animal Welfare in Different Human Cultures, Traditions and Religious Faiths |
title_full_unstemmed | Animal Welfare in Different Human Cultures, Traditions and Religious Faiths |
title_short | Animal Welfare in Different Human Cultures, Traditions and Religious Faiths |
title_sort | animal welfare in different human cultures, traditions and religious faiths |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4093044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25049508 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.r.02 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT szucse animalwelfareindifferenthumanculturestraditionsandreligiousfaiths AT geersr animalwelfareindifferenthumanculturestraditionsandreligiousfaiths AT jezierskit animalwelfareindifferenthumanculturestraditionsandreligiousfaiths AT sossidouen animalwelfareindifferenthumanculturestraditionsandreligiousfaiths AT broomdm animalwelfareindifferenthumanculturestraditionsandreligiousfaiths |