Cargando…

Animal Welfare in Different Human Cultures, Traditions and Religious Faiths

Animal welfare has become a growing concern affecting acceptability of agricultural systems in many countries around the world. An earlier Judeo-Christian interpretation of the Bible (1982) that dominion over animals meant that any degree of exploitation was acceptable has changed for most people to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szűcs, E., Geers, R., Jezierski, T., Sossidou, E. N., Broom, D. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4093044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25049508
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.r.02
_version_ 1782325639675641856
author Szűcs, E.
Geers, R.
Jezierski, T.
Sossidou, E. N.
Broom, D. M.
author_facet Szűcs, E.
Geers, R.
Jezierski, T.
Sossidou, E. N.
Broom, D. M.
author_sort Szűcs, E.
collection PubMed
description Animal welfare has become a growing concern affecting acceptability of agricultural systems in many countries around the world. An earlier Judeo-Christian interpretation of the Bible (1982) that dominion over animals meant that any degree of exploitation was acceptable has changed for most people to mean that each person has responsibility for animal welfare. This view was evident in some ancient Greek writings and has parallels in Islamic teaching. A minority view of Christians, which is a widespread view of Jains, Buddhists and many Hindus, is that animals should not be used by humans as food or for other purposes. The commonest philosophical positions now, concerning how animals should be treated, are a blend of deontological and utilitarian approaches. Most people think that extremes of poor welfare in animals are unacceptable and that those who keep animals should strive for good welfare. Hence animal welfare science, which allows the evaluation of welfare, has developed rapidly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4093044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40930442014-07-21 Animal Welfare in Different Human Cultures, Traditions and Religious Faiths Szűcs, E. Geers, R. Jezierski, T. Sossidou, E. N. Broom, D. M. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Article Animal welfare has become a growing concern affecting acceptability of agricultural systems in many countries around the world. An earlier Judeo-Christian interpretation of the Bible (1982) that dominion over animals meant that any degree of exploitation was acceptable has changed for most people to mean that each person has responsibility for animal welfare. This view was evident in some ancient Greek writings and has parallels in Islamic teaching. A minority view of Christians, which is a widespread view of Jains, Buddhists and many Hindus, is that animals should not be used by humans as food or for other purposes. The commonest philosophical positions now, concerning how animals should be treated, are a blend of deontological and utilitarian approaches. Most people think that extremes of poor welfare in animals are unacceptable and that those who keep animals should strive for good welfare. Hence animal welfare science, which allows the evaluation of welfare, has developed rapidly. Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2012-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4093044/ /pubmed/25049508 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.r.02 Text en Copyright © 2012 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Szűcs, E.
Geers, R.
Jezierski, T.
Sossidou, E. N.
Broom, D. M.
Animal Welfare in Different Human Cultures, Traditions and Religious Faiths
title Animal Welfare in Different Human Cultures, Traditions and Religious Faiths
title_full Animal Welfare in Different Human Cultures, Traditions and Religious Faiths
title_fullStr Animal Welfare in Different Human Cultures, Traditions and Religious Faiths
title_full_unstemmed Animal Welfare in Different Human Cultures, Traditions and Religious Faiths
title_short Animal Welfare in Different Human Cultures, Traditions and Religious Faiths
title_sort animal welfare in different human cultures, traditions and religious faiths
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4093044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25049508
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.r.02
work_keys_str_mv AT szucse animalwelfareindifferenthumanculturestraditionsandreligiousfaiths
AT geersr animalwelfareindifferenthumanculturestraditionsandreligiousfaiths
AT jezierskit animalwelfareindifferenthumanculturestraditionsandreligiousfaiths
AT sossidouen animalwelfareindifferenthumanculturestraditionsandreligiousfaiths
AT broomdm animalwelfareindifferenthumanculturestraditionsandreligiousfaiths