Cargando…

Screening for Prostate Cancer: The Debate Continues

Other than skin cancer, prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men, and it is the second leading cause of cancer-related death for males in the United States. Screening for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen testing became widely used by the late 1980s, augmenting th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matrana, Marc R., Atkinson, Bradley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Harborside Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4093374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25031977
_version_ 1782325714784092160
author Matrana, Marc R.
Atkinson, Bradley
author_facet Matrana, Marc R.
Atkinson, Bradley
author_sort Matrana, Marc R.
collection PubMed
description Other than skin cancer, prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men, and it is the second leading cause of cancer-related death for males in the United States. Screening for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen testing became widely used by the late 1980s, augmenting the digital rectal exam. This led to a decline in the percentage of prostate cancer cases that were metastatic at diagnosis and a decrease in prostate cancer mortality. But some argued it led to overtreatment of prostate cancers as well. Recently, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued recommendations against routine prostate cancer screening in asymptomatic patients. The recent recommendations have created much controversy among medical professionals, patient advocate groups, and the general public. Most prostate cancer screening recommendations from professional organizations agree that an informed discussion and review of each individual patient’s clinical situation should drive the decision to screen or not to screen, but the current USPSTF recommendations largely remove patient and provider autonomy in this regard. They do not contribute toward personalized screening based on individualized patient risk profiles, characteristics, and preferences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4093374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Harborside Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40933742014-07-16 Screening for Prostate Cancer: The Debate Continues Matrana, Marc R. Atkinson, Bradley J Adv Pract Oncol Review Article Other than skin cancer, prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men, and it is the second leading cause of cancer-related death for males in the United States. Screening for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen testing became widely used by the late 1980s, augmenting the digital rectal exam. This led to a decline in the percentage of prostate cancer cases that were metastatic at diagnosis and a decrease in prostate cancer mortality. But some argued it led to overtreatment of prostate cancers as well. Recently, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued recommendations against routine prostate cancer screening in asymptomatic patients. The recent recommendations have created much controversy among medical professionals, patient advocate groups, and the general public. Most prostate cancer screening recommendations from professional organizations agree that an informed discussion and review of each individual patient’s clinical situation should drive the decision to screen or not to screen, but the current USPSTF recommendations largely remove patient and provider autonomy in this regard. They do not contribute toward personalized screening based on individualized patient risk profiles, characteristics, and preferences. Harborside Press 2013 2013-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4093374/ /pubmed/25031977 Text en Copyright © 2013, Harborside Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Review Article
Matrana, Marc R.
Atkinson, Bradley
Screening for Prostate Cancer: The Debate Continues
title Screening for Prostate Cancer: The Debate Continues
title_full Screening for Prostate Cancer: The Debate Continues
title_fullStr Screening for Prostate Cancer: The Debate Continues
title_full_unstemmed Screening for Prostate Cancer: The Debate Continues
title_short Screening for Prostate Cancer: The Debate Continues
title_sort screening for prostate cancer: the debate continues
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4093374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25031977
work_keys_str_mv AT matranamarcr screeningforprostatecancerthedebatecontinues
AT atkinsonbradley screeningforprostatecancerthedebatecontinues