Cargando…
Progesterone replacement with vaginal gel versus i.m. injection: cycle and pregnancy outcomes in IVF patients receiving vitrified blastocysts
STUDY QUESTION: Does the type of luteal support affect pregnancy outcomes in recipients of vitrified blastocysts? SUMMARY ANSWER: Luteal support with vaginal progesterone gel or i.m. progesterone (IMP) results in comparable implantation and pregnancy rates in IVF patients receiving vitrified blastoc...
Autores principales: | Shapiro, Daniel B., Pappadakis, Jennifer A., Ellsworth, Nancy M., Hait, Howard I., Nagy, Zsolt Peter |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4093993/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24847018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu121 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Vaginal micronized progesterone capsule versus vaginal progesterone gel for lutheal support in normoresponder IVF/ICSI-ET cycles
por: Sofuoglu, Kenan, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Day 5 vitrified blastocyst transfer versus day 6 vitrified blastocyst transfer in oocyte donation program
por: Yerushalmi, G. M., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Luteal phase bleeding after IVF cycles: comparison between progesterone vaginal gel and intramuscular progesterone and correlation with pregnancy outcomes
por: Jabara, Sami, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Comparing intramuscular progesterone, vaginal progesterone and 17 -hydroxyprogestrone caproate in IVF and ICSI cycle
por: Moini, Ashraf, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Effects of vitrified cryopreservation duration on IVF and neonatal outcomes
por: Mao, Yuling, et al.
Publicado: (2022)