Cargando…

Cost Analysis of a Nucleic Acid Amplification Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis at an Urban Hospital with a High Prevalence of TB/HIV

INTRODUCTION: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended using a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) but there is a lack of data on NAAT cost-effectiveness. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study that included all patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adelman, Max W., Kurbatova, Ekaterina, Wang, Yun F., Leonard, Michael K., White, Nancy, McFarland, Deborah A., Blumberg, Henry M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4094433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25014783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100649
_version_ 1782325824996769792
author Adelman, Max W.
Kurbatova, Ekaterina
Wang, Yun F.
Leonard, Michael K.
White, Nancy
McFarland, Deborah A.
Blumberg, Henry M.
author_facet Adelman, Max W.
Kurbatova, Ekaterina
Wang, Yun F.
Leonard, Michael K.
White, Nancy
McFarland, Deborah A.
Blumberg, Henry M.
author_sort Adelman, Max W.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended using a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) but there is a lack of data on NAAT cost-effectiveness. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study that included all patients with an AFB smear-positive respiratory specimen at Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, GA, USA between January 2002 and June 2008. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of a commercially available and FDA-approved NAAT (amplified MTD, Gen-Probe) compared to the gold standard of culture. A cost analysis was performed and included costs related to laboratory tests, hospital charges, anti-TB medications, and contact investigations. Average cost per patient was calculated under two conditions: (1) using a NAAT on all AFB smear-postive respiratory specimens and (2) not using a NAAT. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine sensitivity of cost difference to reasonable ranges of model inputs. RESULTS: During a 6 1/2 year study period, there were 1,009 patients with an AFB smear-positive respiratory specimen at our public urban hospital. We found the NAAT to be highly sensitive (99.6%) and specific (99.1%) on AFB smear-positive specimens compared to culture. Overall, the positive predictive value (PPV) of an AFB smear-positive respiratory specimen for culture-confirmed TB was 27%. The PPV of an AFB smear-positive respiratory specimen for culture-confirmed TB was significantly higher for HIV-uninfected persons compared to those who were HIV-seropositive (152/271 [56%] vs. 85/445 [19%]; RR = 2.94, 95% CI 2.36–3.65, p<0.001). The cost savings of using the NAAT was $2,003 per AFB smear-positive case. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of the NAAT on AFB smear-positive respiratory specimens was highly cost-saving in our setting at a U.S. urban public hospital with a high prevalence of TB and HIV because of the low PPV of an AFB smear for culture-confirmed TB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4094433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40944332014-07-15 Cost Analysis of a Nucleic Acid Amplification Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis at an Urban Hospital with a High Prevalence of TB/HIV Adelman, Max W. Kurbatova, Ekaterina Wang, Yun F. Leonard, Michael K. White, Nancy McFarland, Deborah A. Blumberg, Henry M. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended using a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) but there is a lack of data on NAAT cost-effectiveness. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study that included all patients with an AFB smear-positive respiratory specimen at Grady Memorial Hospital in Atlanta, GA, USA between January 2002 and June 2008. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of a commercially available and FDA-approved NAAT (amplified MTD, Gen-Probe) compared to the gold standard of culture. A cost analysis was performed and included costs related to laboratory tests, hospital charges, anti-TB medications, and contact investigations. Average cost per patient was calculated under two conditions: (1) using a NAAT on all AFB smear-postive respiratory specimens and (2) not using a NAAT. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine sensitivity of cost difference to reasonable ranges of model inputs. RESULTS: During a 6 1/2 year study period, there were 1,009 patients with an AFB smear-positive respiratory specimen at our public urban hospital. We found the NAAT to be highly sensitive (99.6%) and specific (99.1%) on AFB smear-positive specimens compared to culture. Overall, the positive predictive value (PPV) of an AFB smear-positive respiratory specimen for culture-confirmed TB was 27%. The PPV of an AFB smear-positive respiratory specimen for culture-confirmed TB was significantly higher for HIV-uninfected persons compared to those who were HIV-seropositive (152/271 [56%] vs. 85/445 [19%]; RR = 2.94, 95% CI 2.36–3.65, p<0.001). The cost savings of using the NAAT was $2,003 per AFB smear-positive case. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of the NAAT on AFB smear-positive respiratory specimens was highly cost-saving in our setting at a U.S. urban public hospital with a high prevalence of TB and HIV because of the low PPV of an AFB smear for culture-confirmed TB. Public Library of Science 2014-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4094433/ /pubmed/25014783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100649 Text en © 2014 Adelman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Adelman, Max W.
Kurbatova, Ekaterina
Wang, Yun F.
Leonard, Michael K.
White, Nancy
McFarland, Deborah A.
Blumberg, Henry M.
Cost Analysis of a Nucleic Acid Amplification Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis at an Urban Hospital with a High Prevalence of TB/HIV
title Cost Analysis of a Nucleic Acid Amplification Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis at an Urban Hospital with a High Prevalence of TB/HIV
title_full Cost Analysis of a Nucleic Acid Amplification Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis at an Urban Hospital with a High Prevalence of TB/HIV
title_fullStr Cost Analysis of a Nucleic Acid Amplification Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis at an Urban Hospital with a High Prevalence of TB/HIV
title_full_unstemmed Cost Analysis of a Nucleic Acid Amplification Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis at an Urban Hospital with a High Prevalence of TB/HIV
title_short Cost Analysis of a Nucleic Acid Amplification Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis at an Urban Hospital with a High Prevalence of TB/HIV
title_sort cost analysis of a nucleic acid amplification test in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis at an urban hospital with a high prevalence of tb/hiv
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4094433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25014783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100649
work_keys_str_mv AT adelmanmaxw costanalysisofanucleicacidamplificationtestinthediagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisatanurbanhospitalwithahighprevalenceoftbhiv
AT kurbatovaekaterina costanalysisofanucleicacidamplificationtestinthediagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisatanurbanhospitalwithahighprevalenceoftbhiv
AT wangyunf costanalysisofanucleicacidamplificationtestinthediagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisatanurbanhospitalwithahighprevalenceoftbhiv
AT leonardmichaelk costanalysisofanucleicacidamplificationtestinthediagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisatanurbanhospitalwithahighprevalenceoftbhiv
AT whitenancy costanalysisofanucleicacidamplificationtestinthediagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisatanurbanhospitalwithahighprevalenceoftbhiv
AT mcfarlanddeboraha costanalysisofanucleicacidamplificationtestinthediagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisatanurbanhospitalwithahighprevalenceoftbhiv
AT blumberghenrym costanalysisofanucleicacidamplificationtestinthediagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisatanurbanhospitalwithahighprevalenceoftbhiv