Cargando…

Serum HE4, CA125, YKL-40, bcl-2, cathepsin-L and prediction optimal debulking surgery, response to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND: The most important prognostic factor in the ovarian cancer is optimal cytoreduction. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy, an only optional method of treatment in this case and is still the subject of debate. The object of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of markers: CA 125, HE4, YKL-40...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chudecka-Głaz, Anita Monika, Cymbaluk-Płoska, Aneta Alicja, Menkiszak, Janusz Leszek, Sompolska-Rzechuła, Agnieszka Monika, Tołoczko-Grabarek, Aleksandra Izabela, Rzepka-Górska, Izabella Anna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4094548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25018782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-2215-7-62
_version_ 1782325851205926912
author Chudecka-Głaz, Anita Monika
Cymbaluk-Płoska, Aneta Alicja
Menkiszak, Janusz Leszek
Sompolska-Rzechuła, Agnieszka Monika
Tołoczko-Grabarek, Aleksandra Izabela
Rzepka-Górska, Izabella Anna
author_facet Chudecka-Głaz, Anita Monika
Cymbaluk-Płoska, Aneta Alicja
Menkiszak, Janusz Leszek
Sompolska-Rzechuła, Agnieszka Monika
Tołoczko-Grabarek, Aleksandra Izabela
Rzepka-Górska, Izabella Anna
author_sort Chudecka-Głaz, Anita Monika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The most important prognostic factor in the ovarian cancer is optimal cytoreduction. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy, an only optional method of treatment in this case and is still the subject of debate. The object of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of markers: CA 125, HE4, YKL-40 and bcl-2 as well as cathepsin L in predicting optimal cytoreduction and response to chemotherapy. METHODS: Sera were secured preoperatively. The division into groups was performed retrospectively depending on the method of treatment (surgery vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy) as well as on response to chemotherapy (sensitive vs resistant vs refractory). Comparisons were made between groups, and the diagnostic usefulness of tested proteins was examined. RESULTS: We found that statistically significant differences between primary operated patients and patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy were applicable only to the tumour markers (CA125 1206.79 vs 2432.38, p = 0.000191; HE4 78.87 vs 602.45, p = 0.000004; YKL-40 108.13 vs 203.96, p = 0.003991). Cathepsin-L and Bcl-2 were statistically insignificant. The cut-off point values were determined for the CA 125 (345 mIU/ml), HE4 (218.43 pmol/L) and YKL-40 (140.9 ng/ml). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were as follows: CA125 (83.3%; 75%; 80.6%; 78.3%), HE4 (86.6%; 91.3%; 92.9%; 84%) and YKL-40 (75%; 83.3%; 84%; 74.1%). CONCLUSION: Among the tested proteins the HE4 marker appears to be helpful in forecasting of optimal cytoreduction and possibly also of the prediction of response to platinum analogues used in first-line treatment of ovarian cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4094548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40945482014-07-12 Serum HE4, CA125, YKL-40, bcl-2, cathepsin-L and prediction optimal debulking surgery, response to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer Chudecka-Głaz, Anita Monika Cymbaluk-Płoska, Aneta Alicja Menkiszak, Janusz Leszek Sompolska-Rzechuła, Agnieszka Monika Tołoczko-Grabarek, Aleksandra Izabela Rzepka-Górska, Izabella Anna J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: The most important prognostic factor in the ovarian cancer is optimal cytoreduction. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy, an only optional method of treatment in this case and is still the subject of debate. The object of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of markers: CA 125, HE4, YKL-40 and bcl-2 as well as cathepsin L in predicting optimal cytoreduction and response to chemotherapy. METHODS: Sera were secured preoperatively. The division into groups was performed retrospectively depending on the method of treatment (surgery vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy) as well as on response to chemotherapy (sensitive vs resistant vs refractory). Comparisons were made between groups, and the diagnostic usefulness of tested proteins was examined. RESULTS: We found that statistically significant differences between primary operated patients and patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy were applicable only to the tumour markers (CA125 1206.79 vs 2432.38, p = 0.000191; HE4 78.87 vs 602.45, p = 0.000004; YKL-40 108.13 vs 203.96, p = 0.003991). Cathepsin-L and Bcl-2 were statistically insignificant. The cut-off point values were determined for the CA 125 (345 mIU/ml), HE4 (218.43 pmol/L) and YKL-40 (140.9 ng/ml). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were as follows: CA125 (83.3%; 75%; 80.6%; 78.3%), HE4 (86.6%; 91.3%; 92.9%; 84%) and YKL-40 (75%; 83.3%; 84%; 74.1%). CONCLUSION: Among the tested proteins the HE4 marker appears to be helpful in forecasting of optimal cytoreduction and possibly also of the prediction of response to platinum analogues used in first-line treatment of ovarian cancer. BioMed Central 2014-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4094548/ /pubmed/25018782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-2215-7-62 Text en Copyright © 2014 Chudecka-Głaz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Chudecka-Głaz, Anita Monika
Cymbaluk-Płoska, Aneta Alicja
Menkiszak, Janusz Leszek
Sompolska-Rzechuła, Agnieszka Monika
Tołoczko-Grabarek, Aleksandra Izabela
Rzepka-Górska, Izabella Anna
Serum HE4, CA125, YKL-40, bcl-2, cathepsin-L and prediction optimal debulking surgery, response to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer
title Serum HE4, CA125, YKL-40, bcl-2, cathepsin-L and prediction optimal debulking surgery, response to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer
title_full Serum HE4, CA125, YKL-40, bcl-2, cathepsin-L and prediction optimal debulking surgery, response to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer
title_fullStr Serum HE4, CA125, YKL-40, bcl-2, cathepsin-L and prediction optimal debulking surgery, response to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer
title_full_unstemmed Serum HE4, CA125, YKL-40, bcl-2, cathepsin-L and prediction optimal debulking surgery, response to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer
title_short Serum HE4, CA125, YKL-40, bcl-2, cathepsin-L and prediction optimal debulking surgery, response to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer
title_sort serum he4, ca125, ykl-40, bcl-2, cathepsin-l and prediction optimal debulking surgery, response to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4094548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25018782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-2215-7-62
work_keys_str_mv AT chudeckagłazanitamonika serumhe4ca125ykl40bcl2cathepsinlandpredictionoptimaldebulkingsurgeryresponsetochemotherapyinovariancancer
AT cymbalukpłoskaanetaalicja serumhe4ca125ykl40bcl2cathepsinlandpredictionoptimaldebulkingsurgeryresponsetochemotherapyinovariancancer
AT menkiszakjanuszleszek serumhe4ca125ykl40bcl2cathepsinlandpredictionoptimaldebulkingsurgeryresponsetochemotherapyinovariancancer
AT sompolskarzechułaagnieszkamonika serumhe4ca125ykl40bcl2cathepsinlandpredictionoptimaldebulkingsurgeryresponsetochemotherapyinovariancancer
AT tołoczkograbarekaleksandraizabela serumhe4ca125ykl40bcl2cathepsinlandpredictionoptimaldebulkingsurgeryresponsetochemotherapyinovariancancer
AT rzepkagorskaizabellaanna serumhe4ca125ykl40bcl2cathepsinlandpredictionoptimaldebulkingsurgeryresponsetochemotherapyinovariancancer