Cargando…

Automatic scan triggering software “confused”: Computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation!

Multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) has become a well-established modality for limb angiography for a variety of indications. The technique of MDCTA depends on the scanner features including the number of detector rows, rotation speeds and single or dual source energy. Integral to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Pankaj, Sinha, Anindita, Khandelwal, Niranjan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4094961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25024519
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.134387
_version_ 1782325929152872448
author Gupta, Pankaj
Sinha, Anindita
Khandelwal, Niranjan
author_facet Gupta, Pankaj
Sinha, Anindita
Khandelwal, Niranjan
author_sort Gupta, Pankaj
collection PubMed
description Multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) has become a well-established modality for limb angiography for a variety of indications. The technique of MDCTA depends on the scanner features including the number of detector rows, rotation speeds and single or dual source energy. Integral to a diagnostic quality CTA is the acquisition timing. Various techniques are available for determining the appropriate timing of scan acquisition which includes fixed delay, test bolus and the bolus tracking technique. The transit times of contrast from the aorta to the peripheral arteries shows a wide variability and is dependent upon the inter individual hemodynamic states. The bolus tracking technique is the most preferred one which allows reliable scan timing with acceptable contrast volume and radiation dose. Pitfalls with all these techniques are well described and we report one such technical pitfall in a case of left foot arteriovenous malformation (AVM) where the bolus tracking technique employed for scan triggering failed to initiate acquisition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4094961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40949612014-07-14 Automatic scan triggering software “confused”: Computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation! Gupta, Pankaj Sinha, Anindita Khandelwal, Niranjan Indian J Radiol Imaging Vascular and Interventional Radiology Multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) has become a well-established modality for limb angiography for a variety of indications. The technique of MDCTA depends on the scanner features including the number of detector rows, rotation speeds and single or dual source energy. Integral to a diagnostic quality CTA is the acquisition timing. Various techniques are available for determining the appropriate timing of scan acquisition which includes fixed delay, test bolus and the bolus tracking technique. The transit times of contrast from the aorta to the peripheral arteries shows a wide variability and is dependent upon the inter individual hemodynamic states. The bolus tracking technique is the most preferred one which allows reliable scan timing with acceptable contrast volume and radiation dose. Pitfalls with all these techniques are well described and we report one such technical pitfall in a case of left foot arteriovenous malformation (AVM) where the bolus tracking technique employed for scan triggering failed to initiate acquisition. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4094961/ /pubmed/25024519 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.134387 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Gupta, Pankaj
Sinha, Anindita
Khandelwal, Niranjan
Automatic scan triggering software “confused”: Computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation!
title Automatic scan triggering software “confused”: Computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation!
title_full Automatic scan triggering software “confused”: Computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation!
title_fullStr Automatic scan triggering software “confused”: Computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation!
title_full_unstemmed Automatic scan triggering software “confused”: Computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation!
title_short Automatic scan triggering software “confused”: Computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation!
title_sort automatic scan triggering software “confused”: computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation!
topic Vascular and Interventional Radiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4094961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25024519
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.134387
work_keys_str_mv AT guptapankaj automaticscantriggeringsoftwareconfusedcomputedtomographyangiographyinfootarteriovenousmalformation
AT sinhaanindita automaticscantriggeringsoftwareconfusedcomputedtomographyangiographyinfootarteriovenousmalformation
AT khandelwalniranjan automaticscantriggeringsoftwareconfusedcomputedtomographyangiographyinfootarteriovenousmalformation