Cargando…
Automatic scan triggering software “confused”: Computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation!
Multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) has become a well-established modality for limb angiography for a variety of indications. The technique of MDCTA depends on the scanner features including the number of detector rows, rotation speeds and single or dual source energy. Integral to...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4094961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25024519 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.134387 |
_version_ | 1782325929152872448 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Pankaj Sinha, Anindita Khandelwal, Niranjan |
author_facet | Gupta, Pankaj Sinha, Anindita Khandelwal, Niranjan |
author_sort | Gupta, Pankaj |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) has become a well-established modality for limb angiography for a variety of indications. The technique of MDCTA depends on the scanner features including the number of detector rows, rotation speeds and single or dual source energy. Integral to a diagnostic quality CTA is the acquisition timing. Various techniques are available for determining the appropriate timing of scan acquisition which includes fixed delay, test bolus and the bolus tracking technique. The transit times of contrast from the aorta to the peripheral arteries shows a wide variability and is dependent upon the inter individual hemodynamic states. The bolus tracking technique is the most preferred one which allows reliable scan timing with acceptable contrast volume and radiation dose. Pitfalls with all these techniques are well described and we report one such technical pitfall in a case of left foot arteriovenous malformation (AVM) where the bolus tracking technique employed for scan triggering failed to initiate acquisition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4094961 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40949612014-07-14 Automatic scan triggering software “confused”: Computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation! Gupta, Pankaj Sinha, Anindita Khandelwal, Niranjan Indian J Radiol Imaging Vascular and Interventional Radiology Multidetector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) has become a well-established modality for limb angiography for a variety of indications. The technique of MDCTA depends on the scanner features including the number of detector rows, rotation speeds and single or dual source energy. Integral to a diagnostic quality CTA is the acquisition timing. Various techniques are available for determining the appropriate timing of scan acquisition which includes fixed delay, test bolus and the bolus tracking technique. The transit times of contrast from the aorta to the peripheral arteries shows a wide variability and is dependent upon the inter individual hemodynamic states. The bolus tracking technique is the most preferred one which allows reliable scan timing with acceptable contrast volume and radiation dose. Pitfalls with all these techniques are well described and we report one such technical pitfall in a case of left foot arteriovenous malformation (AVM) where the bolus tracking technique employed for scan triggering failed to initiate acquisition. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4094961/ /pubmed/25024519 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.134387 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Vascular and Interventional Radiology Gupta, Pankaj Sinha, Anindita Khandelwal, Niranjan Automatic scan triggering software “confused”: Computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation! |
title | Automatic scan triggering software “confused”: Computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation! |
title_full | Automatic scan triggering software “confused”: Computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation! |
title_fullStr | Automatic scan triggering software “confused”: Computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation! |
title_full_unstemmed | Automatic scan triggering software “confused”: Computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation! |
title_short | Automatic scan triggering software “confused”: Computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation! |
title_sort | automatic scan triggering software “confused”: computed tomography angiography in foot arteriovenous malformation! |
topic | Vascular and Interventional Radiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4094961/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25024519 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.134387 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptapankaj automaticscantriggeringsoftwareconfusedcomputedtomographyangiographyinfootarteriovenousmalformation AT sinhaanindita automaticscantriggeringsoftwareconfusedcomputedtomographyangiographyinfootarteriovenousmalformation AT khandelwalniranjan automaticscantriggeringsoftwareconfusedcomputedtomographyangiographyinfootarteriovenousmalformation |