Cargando…
Periosteum as a barrier membrane in the treatment of intrabony defect: A new technique
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of periosteum as a barrier membrane for the treatment of intrabony defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in patients having bilateral intrabony defects. A total of 20 intrabony defects in 10 patients wer...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4095626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25024547 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.134571 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of periosteum as a barrier membrane for the treatment of intrabony defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in patients having bilateral intrabony defects. A total of 20 intrabony defects in 10 patients were treated, out of which 10 defects received periosteal barrier and the other 10 defects received conventional open flap debridement procedure. The efficacy of the treatment was assessed using clinical parameters and dentascan. RESULTS: Statistically significant gain in clinical attachment level (CAL) was found in the test group (2.00 ± 0.26 mm) as compared to the control group (0.60 ± 0.22 mm). In both the treatment modalities (test and control groups), a significant decrease in probing pocket depth of 3.90 ± 0.35 mm and 2.90 ± 0.31 mm was observed, respectively. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Bone defect fill was 1.40 ± 0.16 mm for the test group and 0.90 ± 0.18 mm for the control group, but the difference observed was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that periosteal barrier membrane can be a better alternative of barrier membranes for the treatment of intrabony defects. |
---|