Cargando…

Periosteum as a barrier membrane in the treatment of intrabony defect: A new technique

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of periosteum as a barrier membrane for the treatment of intrabony defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in patients having bilateral intrabony defects. A total of 20 intrabony defects in 10 patients wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saimbi, Charanjeet Singh, Gautam, Anju, Khan, Mohd. Akhlak, Nandlal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4095626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25024547
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.134571
_version_ 1782326065787568128
author Saimbi, Charanjeet Singh
Gautam, Anju
Khan, Mohd. Akhlak
Nandlal,
author_facet Saimbi, Charanjeet Singh
Gautam, Anju
Khan, Mohd. Akhlak
Nandlal,
author_sort Saimbi, Charanjeet Singh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of periosteum as a barrier membrane for the treatment of intrabony defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in patients having bilateral intrabony defects. A total of 20 intrabony defects in 10 patients were treated, out of which 10 defects received periosteal barrier and the other 10 defects received conventional open flap debridement procedure. The efficacy of the treatment was assessed using clinical parameters and dentascan. RESULTS: Statistically significant gain in clinical attachment level (CAL) was found in the test group (2.00 ± 0.26 mm) as compared to the control group (0.60 ± 0.22 mm). In both the treatment modalities (test and control groups), a significant decrease in probing pocket depth of 3.90 ± 0.35 mm and 2.90 ± 0.31 mm was observed, respectively. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Bone defect fill was 1.40 ± 0.16 mm for the test group and 0.90 ± 0.18 mm for the control group, but the difference observed was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that periosteal barrier membrane can be a better alternative of barrier membranes for the treatment of intrabony defects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4095626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40956262014-07-14 Periosteum as a barrier membrane in the treatment of intrabony defect: A new technique Saimbi, Charanjeet Singh Gautam, Anju Khan, Mohd. Akhlak Nandlal, J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of periosteum as a barrier membrane for the treatment of intrabony defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in patients having bilateral intrabony defects. A total of 20 intrabony defects in 10 patients were treated, out of which 10 defects received periosteal barrier and the other 10 defects received conventional open flap debridement procedure. The efficacy of the treatment was assessed using clinical parameters and dentascan. RESULTS: Statistically significant gain in clinical attachment level (CAL) was found in the test group (2.00 ± 0.26 mm) as compared to the control group (0.60 ± 0.22 mm). In both the treatment modalities (test and control groups), a significant decrease in probing pocket depth of 3.90 ± 0.35 mm and 2.90 ± 0.31 mm was observed, respectively. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Bone defect fill was 1.40 ± 0.16 mm for the test group and 0.90 ± 0.18 mm for the control group, but the difference observed was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that periosteal barrier membrane can be a better alternative of barrier membranes for the treatment of intrabony defects. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4095626/ /pubmed/25024547 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.134571 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Saimbi, Charanjeet Singh
Gautam, Anju
Khan, Mohd. Akhlak
Nandlal,
Periosteum as a barrier membrane in the treatment of intrabony defect: A new technique
title Periosteum as a barrier membrane in the treatment of intrabony defect: A new technique
title_full Periosteum as a barrier membrane in the treatment of intrabony defect: A new technique
title_fullStr Periosteum as a barrier membrane in the treatment of intrabony defect: A new technique
title_full_unstemmed Periosteum as a barrier membrane in the treatment of intrabony defect: A new technique
title_short Periosteum as a barrier membrane in the treatment of intrabony defect: A new technique
title_sort periosteum as a barrier membrane in the treatment of intrabony defect: a new technique
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4095626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25024547
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.134571
work_keys_str_mv AT saimbicharanjeetsingh periosteumasabarriermembraneinthetreatmentofintrabonydefectanewtechnique
AT gautamanju periosteumasabarriermembraneinthetreatmentofintrabonydefectanewtechnique
AT khanmohdakhlak periosteumasabarriermembraneinthetreatmentofintrabonydefectanewtechnique
AT nandlal periosteumasabarriermembraneinthetreatmentofintrabonydefectanewtechnique