Cargando…

Analysis of patient acceptance following treatment of Miller's class II gingival recession with acellular dermal matrix and connective tissue graft

OBJECTIVE: Obtaining predictable and aesthetic root coverage has become an important part of periodontal therapy. The search for the appropriate root coverage techniques has resulted in many different approaches. The goal of this study was to evaluate the degree of patient acceptance with acellular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goyal, Niti, Gupta, Rajan, Pandit, Nymphea, Dahiya, Parveen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4095629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25024550
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.134574
_version_ 1782326066469142528
author Goyal, Niti
Gupta, Rajan
Pandit, Nymphea
Dahiya, Parveen
author_facet Goyal, Niti
Gupta, Rajan
Pandit, Nymphea
Dahiya, Parveen
author_sort Goyal, Niti
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Obtaining predictable and aesthetic root coverage has become an important part of periodontal therapy. The search for the appropriate root coverage techniques has resulted in many different approaches. The goal of this study was to evaluate the degree of patient acceptance with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) allograft in the treatment of buccal gingival recession and to compare it with subepithelial connective tissue graft. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with Miller's class II recessions were treated and randomly assigned to the test group (ADM) and control group (subepithelial connective tissue graft). All patients underwent full periodontal evaluation and pre-surgical preparation, including oral hygiene instructions and scaling and root planing. The exposed roots were thoroughly planed and covered by a graft without any further root treatment. Results were evaluated based on the parameters measuring patient satisfaction and clinical outcome after 6 months of the surgical procedure. RESULTS: Postoperatively, significant root coverage, reduction in probing depth, gain in clinical attachment level, and increase in widths of keratinized tissue and attached gingiva were observed on intra-group comparison. There was no significant difference in any of the parameters between test and control groups. CONCLUSION: The subepithelial connective tissue graft and ADM graft were able to successfully treat gingival recession defects; however, the ADM showed better patient acceptance than the connective tissue graft.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4095629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40956292014-07-14 Analysis of patient acceptance following treatment of Miller's class II gingival recession with acellular dermal matrix and connective tissue graft Goyal, Niti Gupta, Rajan Pandit, Nymphea Dahiya, Parveen J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Obtaining predictable and aesthetic root coverage has become an important part of periodontal therapy. The search for the appropriate root coverage techniques has resulted in many different approaches. The goal of this study was to evaluate the degree of patient acceptance with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) allograft in the treatment of buccal gingival recession and to compare it with subepithelial connective tissue graft. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with Miller's class II recessions were treated and randomly assigned to the test group (ADM) and control group (subepithelial connective tissue graft). All patients underwent full periodontal evaluation and pre-surgical preparation, including oral hygiene instructions and scaling and root planing. The exposed roots were thoroughly planed and covered by a graft without any further root treatment. Results were evaluated based on the parameters measuring patient satisfaction and clinical outcome after 6 months of the surgical procedure. RESULTS: Postoperatively, significant root coverage, reduction in probing depth, gain in clinical attachment level, and increase in widths of keratinized tissue and attached gingiva were observed on intra-group comparison. There was no significant difference in any of the parameters between test and control groups. CONCLUSION: The subepithelial connective tissue graft and ADM graft were able to successfully treat gingival recession defects; however, the ADM showed better patient acceptance than the connective tissue graft. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4095629/ /pubmed/25024550 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.134574 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Goyal, Niti
Gupta, Rajan
Pandit, Nymphea
Dahiya, Parveen
Analysis of patient acceptance following treatment of Miller's class II gingival recession with acellular dermal matrix and connective tissue graft
title Analysis of patient acceptance following treatment of Miller's class II gingival recession with acellular dermal matrix and connective tissue graft
title_full Analysis of patient acceptance following treatment of Miller's class II gingival recession with acellular dermal matrix and connective tissue graft
title_fullStr Analysis of patient acceptance following treatment of Miller's class II gingival recession with acellular dermal matrix and connective tissue graft
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of patient acceptance following treatment of Miller's class II gingival recession with acellular dermal matrix and connective tissue graft
title_short Analysis of patient acceptance following treatment of Miller's class II gingival recession with acellular dermal matrix and connective tissue graft
title_sort analysis of patient acceptance following treatment of miller's class ii gingival recession with acellular dermal matrix and connective tissue graft
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4095629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25024550
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.134574
work_keys_str_mv AT goyalniti analysisofpatientacceptancefollowingtreatmentofmillersclassiigingivalrecessionwithacellulardermalmatrixandconnectivetissuegraft
AT guptarajan analysisofpatientacceptancefollowingtreatmentofmillersclassiigingivalrecessionwithacellulardermalmatrixandconnectivetissuegraft
AT panditnymphea analysisofpatientacceptancefollowingtreatmentofmillersclassiigingivalrecessionwithacellulardermalmatrixandconnectivetissuegraft
AT dahiyaparveen analysisofpatientacceptancefollowingtreatmentofmillersclassiigingivalrecessionwithacellulardermalmatrixandconnectivetissuegraft