Cargando…

Evaluation of CM5 Charges for Condensed-Phase Modeling

[Image: see text] The recently developed Charge Model 5 (CM5) is tested for its utility in condensed-phase simulations. The CM5 approach, which derives partial atomic charges from Hirshfeld population analyses, provides excellent results for gas-phase dipole moments and is applicable to all elements...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vilseck, Jonah Z., Tirado-Rives, Julian, Jorgensen, William L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2014
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4095915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct500016d
_version_ 1782326100585611264
author Vilseck, Jonah Z.
Tirado-Rives, Julian
Jorgensen, William L.
author_facet Vilseck, Jonah Z.
Tirado-Rives, Julian
Jorgensen, William L.
author_sort Vilseck, Jonah Z.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The recently developed Charge Model 5 (CM5) is tested for its utility in condensed-phase simulations. The CM5 approach, which derives partial atomic charges from Hirshfeld population analyses, provides excellent results for gas-phase dipole moments and is applicable to all elements of the periodic table. Herein, the adequacy of scaled CM5 charges for use in modeling aqueous solutions has been evaluated by computing free energies of hydration (ΔG(hyd)) for 42 neutral organic molecules via Monte Carlo statistical mechanics. An optimal scaling factor for the CM5 charges was determined to be 1.27, resulting in a mean unsigned error (MUE) of 1.1 kcal/mol for the free energies of hydration. Testing for an additional 20 molecules gave an MUE of 1.3 kcal/mol. The high precision of the results is confirmed by free energy calculations using both sequential perturbations and complete molecular annihilation. Performance for specific functional groups is discussed; sulfur-containing molecules yield the largest errors. In addition, the scaling factor of 1.27 is shown to be appropriate for CM5 charges derived from a variety of density functional methods and basis sets. Though the average errors from the 1.27*CM5 results are only slightly lower than those using 1.14*CM1A charges, the broader applicability and easier access to CM5 charges via the Gaussian program are additional attractive features. The 1.27*CM5 charge model can be used for an enormous variety of applications in conjunction with many fixed-charge force fields and molecular modeling programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4095915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40959152015-04-01 Evaluation of CM5 Charges for Condensed-Phase Modeling Vilseck, Jonah Z. Tirado-Rives, Julian Jorgensen, William L. J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] The recently developed Charge Model 5 (CM5) is tested for its utility in condensed-phase simulations. The CM5 approach, which derives partial atomic charges from Hirshfeld population analyses, provides excellent results for gas-phase dipole moments and is applicable to all elements of the periodic table. Herein, the adequacy of scaled CM5 charges for use in modeling aqueous solutions has been evaluated by computing free energies of hydration (ΔG(hyd)) for 42 neutral organic molecules via Monte Carlo statistical mechanics. An optimal scaling factor for the CM5 charges was determined to be 1.27, resulting in a mean unsigned error (MUE) of 1.1 kcal/mol for the free energies of hydration. Testing for an additional 20 molecules gave an MUE of 1.3 kcal/mol. The high precision of the results is confirmed by free energy calculations using both sequential perturbations and complete molecular annihilation. Performance for specific functional groups is discussed; sulfur-containing molecules yield the largest errors. In addition, the scaling factor of 1.27 is shown to be appropriate for CM5 charges derived from a variety of density functional methods and basis sets. Though the average errors from the 1.27*CM5 results are only slightly lower than those using 1.14*CM1A charges, the broader applicability and easier access to CM5 charges via the Gaussian program are additional attractive features. The 1.27*CM5 charge model can be used for an enormous variety of applications in conjunction with many fixed-charge force fields and molecular modeling programs. American Chemical Society 2014-04-01 2014-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4095915/ /pubmed/25061445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct500016d Text en Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society Terms of Use (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html)
spellingShingle Vilseck, Jonah Z.
Tirado-Rives, Julian
Jorgensen, William L.
Evaluation of CM5 Charges for Condensed-Phase Modeling
title Evaluation of CM5 Charges for Condensed-Phase Modeling
title_full Evaluation of CM5 Charges for Condensed-Phase Modeling
title_fullStr Evaluation of CM5 Charges for Condensed-Phase Modeling
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of CM5 Charges for Condensed-Phase Modeling
title_short Evaluation of CM5 Charges for Condensed-Phase Modeling
title_sort evaluation of cm5 charges for condensed-phase modeling
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4095915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ct500016d
work_keys_str_mv AT vilseckjonahz evaluationofcm5chargesforcondensedphasemodeling
AT tiradorivesjulian evaluationofcm5chargesforcondensedphasemodeling
AT jorgensenwilliaml evaluationofcm5chargesforcondensedphasemodeling