Cargando…

Comparison of four methods for extracting DNA from dried blood on filter paper for PCR targeting the mitochondrial Plasmodium genome

BACKGROUND: Few studies comparing multiple methods for DNA extraction from dried blood spots (DBS) on filter paper for PCR targeting the Plasmodium genome have been done. METHODS: Frequently-used methods for DNA extraction from DBS using Chelex-100, InstaGene Matrix, QIAamp DNA Mini Kit and TE buffe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strøm, Gro E. A., Tellevik, Marit G., Hanevik, Kurt, Langeland, Nina, Blomberg, Bjørn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4096016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24907711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/tru084
_version_ 1782326111729876992
author Strøm, Gro E. A.
Tellevik, Marit G.
Hanevik, Kurt
Langeland, Nina
Blomberg, Bjørn
author_facet Strøm, Gro E. A.
Tellevik, Marit G.
Hanevik, Kurt
Langeland, Nina
Blomberg, Bjørn
author_sort Strøm, Gro E. A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few studies comparing multiple methods for DNA extraction from dried blood spots (DBS) on filter paper for PCR targeting the Plasmodium genome have been done. METHODS: Frequently-used methods for DNA extraction from DBS using Chelex-100, InstaGene Matrix, QIAamp DNA Mini Kit and TE buffer were compared on a dilution series of a standardized Plasmodium falciparum positive sample. The two DNA extraction methods resulting in the lowest limits of detection were compared by testing both on 31 P. falciparum positive samples collected under field conditions and stored for 4 years. RESULTS: The Chelex-100, InstaGene Matrix and QIAamp DNA Mini Kit methods performed similarly, resulting in the detection of 0.5 to 2 parasites per microliter (p/µl). The same 13 clinical samples (13/31; 42%) were positive using both DNA extraction methods with the lowest limits of detection. CONCLUSIONS: Simple and low-cost methods can be sensitive and useful in extracting DNA from DBS. Poor results on stored clinical DBS indicate that further studies on the impact of storage duration and conditions, and choice of filter paper should be performed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4096016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40960162014-07-14 Comparison of four methods for extracting DNA from dried blood on filter paper for PCR targeting the mitochondrial Plasmodium genome Strøm, Gro E. A. Tellevik, Marit G. Hanevik, Kurt Langeland, Nina Blomberg, Bjørn Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Original Articles BACKGROUND: Few studies comparing multiple methods for DNA extraction from dried blood spots (DBS) on filter paper for PCR targeting the Plasmodium genome have been done. METHODS: Frequently-used methods for DNA extraction from DBS using Chelex-100, InstaGene Matrix, QIAamp DNA Mini Kit and TE buffer were compared on a dilution series of a standardized Plasmodium falciparum positive sample. The two DNA extraction methods resulting in the lowest limits of detection were compared by testing both on 31 P. falciparum positive samples collected under field conditions and stored for 4 years. RESULTS: The Chelex-100, InstaGene Matrix and QIAamp DNA Mini Kit methods performed similarly, resulting in the detection of 0.5 to 2 parasites per microliter (p/µl). The same 13 clinical samples (13/31; 42%) were positive using both DNA extraction methods with the lowest limits of detection. CONCLUSIONS: Simple and low-cost methods can be sensitive and useful in extracting DNA from DBS. Poor results on stored clinical DBS indicate that further studies on the impact of storage duration and conditions, and choice of filter paper should be performed. Oxford University Press 2014-08 2014-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4096016/ /pubmed/24907711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/tru084 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Strøm, Gro E. A.
Tellevik, Marit G.
Hanevik, Kurt
Langeland, Nina
Blomberg, Bjørn
Comparison of four methods for extracting DNA from dried blood on filter paper for PCR targeting the mitochondrial Plasmodium genome
title Comparison of four methods for extracting DNA from dried blood on filter paper for PCR targeting the mitochondrial Plasmodium genome
title_full Comparison of four methods for extracting DNA from dried blood on filter paper for PCR targeting the mitochondrial Plasmodium genome
title_fullStr Comparison of four methods for extracting DNA from dried blood on filter paper for PCR targeting the mitochondrial Plasmodium genome
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of four methods for extracting DNA from dried blood on filter paper for PCR targeting the mitochondrial Plasmodium genome
title_short Comparison of four methods for extracting DNA from dried blood on filter paper for PCR targeting the mitochondrial Plasmodium genome
title_sort comparison of four methods for extracting dna from dried blood on filter paper for pcr targeting the mitochondrial plasmodium genome
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4096016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24907711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/tru084
work_keys_str_mv AT strømgroea comparisonoffourmethodsforextractingdnafromdriedbloodonfilterpaperforpcrtargetingthemitochondrialplasmodiumgenome
AT tellevikmaritg comparisonoffourmethodsforextractingdnafromdriedbloodonfilterpaperforpcrtargetingthemitochondrialplasmodiumgenome
AT hanevikkurt comparisonoffourmethodsforextractingdnafromdriedbloodonfilterpaperforpcrtargetingthemitochondrialplasmodiumgenome
AT langelandnina comparisonoffourmethodsforextractingdnafromdriedbloodonfilterpaperforpcrtargetingthemitochondrialplasmodiumgenome
AT blombergbjørn comparisonoffourmethodsforextractingdnafromdriedbloodonfilterpaperforpcrtargetingthemitochondrialplasmodiumgenome