Cargando…
Comparison of four methods for extracting DNA from dried blood on filter paper for PCR targeting the mitochondrial Plasmodium genome
BACKGROUND: Few studies comparing multiple methods for DNA extraction from dried blood spots (DBS) on filter paper for PCR targeting the Plasmodium genome have been done. METHODS: Frequently-used methods for DNA extraction from DBS using Chelex-100, InstaGene Matrix, QIAamp DNA Mini Kit and TE buffe...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4096016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24907711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/tru084 |
_version_ | 1782326111729876992 |
---|---|
author | Strøm, Gro E. A. Tellevik, Marit G. Hanevik, Kurt Langeland, Nina Blomberg, Bjørn |
author_facet | Strøm, Gro E. A. Tellevik, Marit G. Hanevik, Kurt Langeland, Nina Blomberg, Bjørn |
author_sort | Strøm, Gro E. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Few studies comparing multiple methods for DNA extraction from dried blood spots (DBS) on filter paper for PCR targeting the Plasmodium genome have been done. METHODS: Frequently-used methods for DNA extraction from DBS using Chelex-100, InstaGene Matrix, QIAamp DNA Mini Kit and TE buffer were compared on a dilution series of a standardized Plasmodium falciparum positive sample. The two DNA extraction methods resulting in the lowest limits of detection were compared by testing both on 31 P. falciparum positive samples collected under field conditions and stored for 4 years. RESULTS: The Chelex-100, InstaGene Matrix and QIAamp DNA Mini Kit methods performed similarly, resulting in the detection of 0.5 to 2 parasites per microliter (p/µl). The same 13 clinical samples (13/31; 42%) were positive using both DNA extraction methods with the lowest limits of detection. CONCLUSIONS: Simple and low-cost methods can be sensitive and useful in extracting DNA from DBS. Poor results on stored clinical DBS indicate that further studies on the impact of storage duration and conditions, and choice of filter paper should be performed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4096016 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40960162014-07-14 Comparison of four methods for extracting DNA from dried blood on filter paper for PCR targeting the mitochondrial Plasmodium genome Strøm, Gro E. A. Tellevik, Marit G. Hanevik, Kurt Langeland, Nina Blomberg, Bjørn Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Original Articles BACKGROUND: Few studies comparing multiple methods for DNA extraction from dried blood spots (DBS) on filter paper for PCR targeting the Plasmodium genome have been done. METHODS: Frequently-used methods for DNA extraction from DBS using Chelex-100, InstaGene Matrix, QIAamp DNA Mini Kit and TE buffer were compared on a dilution series of a standardized Plasmodium falciparum positive sample. The two DNA extraction methods resulting in the lowest limits of detection were compared by testing both on 31 P. falciparum positive samples collected under field conditions and stored for 4 years. RESULTS: The Chelex-100, InstaGene Matrix and QIAamp DNA Mini Kit methods performed similarly, resulting in the detection of 0.5 to 2 parasites per microliter (p/µl). The same 13 clinical samples (13/31; 42%) were positive using both DNA extraction methods with the lowest limits of detection. CONCLUSIONS: Simple and low-cost methods can be sensitive and useful in extracting DNA from DBS. Poor results on stored clinical DBS indicate that further studies on the impact of storage duration and conditions, and choice of filter paper should be performed. Oxford University Press 2014-08 2014-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4096016/ /pubmed/24907711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/tru084 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Strøm, Gro E. A. Tellevik, Marit G. Hanevik, Kurt Langeland, Nina Blomberg, Bjørn Comparison of four methods for extracting DNA from dried blood on filter paper for PCR targeting the mitochondrial Plasmodium genome |
title | Comparison of four methods for extracting DNA from dried blood on filter paper for PCR targeting the mitochondrial Plasmodium genome |
title_full | Comparison of four methods for extracting DNA from dried blood on filter paper for PCR targeting the mitochondrial Plasmodium genome |
title_fullStr | Comparison of four methods for extracting DNA from dried blood on filter paper for PCR targeting the mitochondrial Plasmodium genome |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of four methods for extracting DNA from dried blood on filter paper for PCR targeting the mitochondrial Plasmodium genome |
title_short | Comparison of four methods for extracting DNA from dried blood on filter paper for PCR targeting the mitochondrial Plasmodium genome |
title_sort | comparison of four methods for extracting dna from dried blood on filter paper for pcr targeting the mitochondrial plasmodium genome |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4096016/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24907711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/tru084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strømgroea comparisonoffourmethodsforextractingdnafromdriedbloodonfilterpaperforpcrtargetingthemitochondrialplasmodiumgenome AT tellevikmaritg comparisonoffourmethodsforextractingdnafromdriedbloodonfilterpaperforpcrtargetingthemitochondrialplasmodiumgenome AT hanevikkurt comparisonoffourmethodsforextractingdnafromdriedbloodonfilterpaperforpcrtargetingthemitochondrialplasmodiumgenome AT langelandnina comparisonoffourmethodsforextractingdnafromdriedbloodonfilterpaperforpcrtargetingthemitochondrialplasmodiumgenome AT blombergbjørn comparisonoffourmethodsforextractingdnafromdriedbloodonfilterpaperforpcrtargetingthemitochondrialplasmodiumgenome |