Cargando…
Modified prone position to dissect the popliteal fossa
INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, the prone position is used for dissecting the popliteal fossa, which requires endotracheal intubation. Access to the airway in this position is limited, hence the complications. It is not surprising that the prone position is not favoured by the anaesthetists, especially...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of Surgeons
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4098575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23484992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588413X13511609955779 |
_version_ | 1782326369518092288 |
---|---|
author | Boulemden, A Ritzmann, T Liptrot, S Abbas, A Makhdoomi, KR |
author_facet | Boulemden, A Ritzmann, T Liptrot, S Abbas, A Makhdoomi, KR |
author_sort | Boulemden, A |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, the prone position is used for dissecting the popliteal fossa, which requires endotracheal intubation. Access to the airway in this position is limited, hence the complications. It is not surprising that the prone position is not favoured by the anaesthetists, especially in patients with a high body mass index. We describe a safe and novel alternative to the prone position. METHODS: The modified prone position (MPP) is described as an alternative position that facilitates access to the airway. RESULTS: Between October 2007 and May 2010, 12 patients underwent popliteal fossa dissection using the MPP. All patients had general anaesthesia using a laryngeal mask airway with the exception of one, who had an epidural anaesthesia. There were no airway or haemodynamic complications. The surgical access to the popliteal fossa was as good as with the traditional prone position. CONCLUSIONS: The MPP was satisfactory for both the surgeon and the anaesthetists. The authors now use this position routinely for dissecting the popliteal fossa. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4098575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Royal College of Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40985752014-07-17 Modified prone position to dissect the popliteal fossa Boulemden, A Ritzmann, T Liptrot, S Abbas, A Makhdoomi, KR Ann R Coll Surg Engl Vascular INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, the prone position is used for dissecting the popliteal fossa, which requires endotracheal intubation. Access to the airway in this position is limited, hence the complications. It is not surprising that the prone position is not favoured by the anaesthetists, especially in patients with a high body mass index. We describe a safe and novel alternative to the prone position. METHODS: The modified prone position (MPP) is described as an alternative position that facilitates access to the airway. RESULTS: Between October 2007 and May 2010, 12 patients underwent popliteal fossa dissection using the MPP. All patients had general anaesthesia using a laryngeal mask airway with the exception of one, who had an epidural anaesthesia. There were no airway or haemodynamic complications. The surgical access to the popliteal fossa was as good as with the traditional prone position. CONCLUSIONS: The MPP was satisfactory for both the surgeon and the anaesthetists. The authors now use this position routinely for dissecting the popliteal fossa. Royal College of Surgeons 2013-03 2013-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4098575/ /pubmed/23484992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588413X13511609955779 Text en Copyright © 2013 Royal College of Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Vascular Boulemden, A Ritzmann, T Liptrot, S Abbas, A Makhdoomi, KR Modified prone position to dissect the popliteal fossa |
title | Modified prone position to dissect the popliteal fossa |
title_full | Modified prone position to dissect the popliteal fossa |
title_fullStr | Modified prone position to dissect the popliteal fossa |
title_full_unstemmed | Modified prone position to dissect the popliteal fossa |
title_short | Modified prone position to dissect the popliteal fossa |
title_sort | modified prone position to dissect the popliteal fossa |
topic | Vascular |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4098575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23484992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588413X13511609955779 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boulemdena modifiedpronepositiontodissectthepoplitealfossa AT ritzmannt modifiedpronepositiontodissectthepoplitealfossa AT liptrots modifiedpronepositiontodissectthepoplitealfossa AT abbasa modifiedpronepositiontodissectthepoplitealfossa AT makhdoomikr modifiedpronepositiontodissectthepoplitealfossa |