Cargando…
Is DWI/ADC a Useful Tool in the Characterization of Focal Hepatic Lesions Suspected of Malignancy?
OBJECTIVE: Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values calculated through magnetic resonance imaging have been proposed as a useful tool to distinguish benign from malignant liver lesions. Most studies however included simple cysts in their analysis. Liver cysts are easy to diagnose, have very high...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4099077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25025151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101944 |
_version_ | 1782326426653949952 |
---|---|
author | Testa, Maria Luiza Chojniak, Rubens Sene, Letícia Silva Damascena, Aline Santos Guimarães, Marcos Duarte Szklaruk, Janio Marchiori, Edson |
author_facet | Testa, Maria Luiza Chojniak, Rubens Sene, Letícia Silva Damascena, Aline Santos Guimarães, Marcos Duarte Szklaruk, Janio Marchiori, Edson |
author_sort | Testa, Maria Luiza |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values calculated through magnetic resonance imaging have been proposed as a useful tool to distinguish benign from malignant liver lesions. Most studies however included simple cysts in their analysis. Liver cysts are easy to diagnose, have very high ADC values and their inclusion facilitates differentiation in the ADC values between benign and malignant liver lesions groups. We prospectively evaluated the ability of ADC values to differentiate metastatic liver lesions from all benign or only solid benign liver lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-seven adult cancer patients with 188 liver lesions were evaluated. Lesions were categorized as metastatic or benign throughout imaging and clinical evaluation. One hundred and five (105) metastatic lesions and 83 benign lesions including hemangiomas (37), cysts (42), adenomas (2) and focal nodular hyperplasias (2) were evaluated. ADC values were calculated for each lesion utilizing two b values (0 and 600 sec/mm(2)). RESULTS: The average ADC value for cysts was 2.4×10(−3) mm(2)/sec (CI: 2.1–2.6), for solid benign lesions was 1.4×10(−3) mm(2)/sec (CI: 1.1–1.7) and for metastases was 1.0×10(−3) mm(2)/sec (CI: 0.8–1.3). There was a difference between the ADC values of metastases and benign solid lesions (p<0.0001). With the ADC value of 1.5×10(−3) mm(2)/sec as a cut off it is possible to distinguish metastatic from benign liver lesions, including cysts, with an accuracy of 78%. But to distinguish metastatic from benign solid liver lesions the best ADC cut off value was 1.2×10(−3) mm(2)/sec and the accuracy drops to 71%. CONCLUSIONS: ADC values proved to be helpful in the distinction between metastasis and benign solid hepatic lesions. But the exclusion of cysts in the analysis point out to a lower cut off value and lower accuracy than previously reported. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4099077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-40990772014-07-18 Is DWI/ADC a Useful Tool in the Characterization of Focal Hepatic Lesions Suspected of Malignancy? Testa, Maria Luiza Chojniak, Rubens Sene, Letícia Silva Damascena, Aline Santos Guimarães, Marcos Duarte Szklaruk, Janio Marchiori, Edson PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values calculated through magnetic resonance imaging have been proposed as a useful tool to distinguish benign from malignant liver lesions. Most studies however included simple cysts in their analysis. Liver cysts are easy to diagnose, have very high ADC values and their inclusion facilitates differentiation in the ADC values between benign and malignant liver lesions groups. We prospectively evaluated the ability of ADC values to differentiate metastatic liver lesions from all benign or only solid benign liver lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-seven adult cancer patients with 188 liver lesions were evaluated. Lesions were categorized as metastatic or benign throughout imaging and clinical evaluation. One hundred and five (105) metastatic lesions and 83 benign lesions including hemangiomas (37), cysts (42), adenomas (2) and focal nodular hyperplasias (2) were evaluated. ADC values were calculated for each lesion utilizing two b values (0 and 600 sec/mm(2)). RESULTS: The average ADC value for cysts was 2.4×10(−3) mm(2)/sec (CI: 2.1–2.6), for solid benign lesions was 1.4×10(−3) mm(2)/sec (CI: 1.1–1.7) and for metastases was 1.0×10(−3) mm(2)/sec (CI: 0.8–1.3). There was a difference between the ADC values of metastases and benign solid lesions (p<0.0001). With the ADC value of 1.5×10(−3) mm(2)/sec as a cut off it is possible to distinguish metastatic from benign liver lesions, including cysts, with an accuracy of 78%. But to distinguish metastatic from benign solid liver lesions the best ADC cut off value was 1.2×10(−3) mm(2)/sec and the accuracy drops to 71%. CONCLUSIONS: ADC values proved to be helpful in the distinction between metastasis and benign solid hepatic lesions. But the exclusion of cysts in the analysis point out to a lower cut off value and lower accuracy than previously reported. Public Library of Science 2014-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4099077/ /pubmed/25025151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101944 Text en © 2014 Testa et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Testa, Maria Luiza Chojniak, Rubens Sene, Letícia Silva Damascena, Aline Santos Guimarães, Marcos Duarte Szklaruk, Janio Marchiori, Edson Is DWI/ADC a Useful Tool in the Characterization of Focal Hepatic Lesions Suspected of Malignancy? |
title | Is DWI/ADC a Useful Tool in the Characterization of Focal Hepatic Lesions Suspected of Malignancy? |
title_full | Is DWI/ADC a Useful Tool in the Characterization of Focal Hepatic Lesions Suspected of Malignancy? |
title_fullStr | Is DWI/ADC a Useful Tool in the Characterization of Focal Hepatic Lesions Suspected of Malignancy? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is DWI/ADC a Useful Tool in the Characterization of Focal Hepatic Lesions Suspected of Malignancy? |
title_short | Is DWI/ADC a Useful Tool in the Characterization of Focal Hepatic Lesions Suspected of Malignancy? |
title_sort | is dwi/adc a useful tool in the characterization of focal hepatic lesions suspected of malignancy? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4099077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25025151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101944 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT testamarialuiza isdwiadcausefultoolinthecharacterizationoffocalhepaticlesionssuspectedofmalignancy AT chojniakrubens isdwiadcausefultoolinthecharacterizationoffocalhepaticlesionssuspectedofmalignancy AT seneleticiasilva isdwiadcausefultoolinthecharacterizationoffocalhepaticlesionssuspectedofmalignancy AT damascenaalinesantos isdwiadcausefultoolinthecharacterizationoffocalhepaticlesionssuspectedofmalignancy AT guimaraesmarcosduarte isdwiadcausefultoolinthecharacterizationoffocalhepaticlesionssuspectedofmalignancy AT szklarukjanio isdwiadcausefultoolinthecharacterizationoffocalhepaticlesionssuspectedofmalignancy AT marchioriedson isdwiadcausefultoolinthecharacterizationoffocalhepaticlesionssuspectedofmalignancy |