Cargando…

Randomized controlled multicenter trial on the effectiveness of the collagen hemostat Sangustop(®) compared with a carrier-bound fibrin sealant during liver resection (ESSCALIVER study, NCT00918619)

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in liver surgery over the past decades, hemostasis during hepatic resections remains challenging. This multicenter randomized study compares the hemostatic effect of a collagen hemostat vs. a carrier-bound fibrin sealant after hepatic resection. METHODS: Patients sch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moench, C., Mihaljevic, A. L., Hermanutz, V., Thasler, W. E., Suna, K., Diener, M. K., Seehofer, D., Mischinger, H. J., Jansen-Winkeln, B., Knaebel, H. P., Bechstein, W. O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4099526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24880345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-014-1203-9
_version_ 1782326499202826240
author Moench, C.
Mihaljevic, A. L.
Hermanutz, V.
Thasler, W. E.
Suna, K.
Diener, M. K.
Seehofer, D.
Mischinger, H. J.
Jansen-Winkeln, B.
Knaebel, H. P.
Bechstein, W. O.
author_facet Moench, C.
Mihaljevic, A. L.
Hermanutz, V.
Thasler, W. E.
Suna, K.
Diener, M. K.
Seehofer, D.
Mischinger, H. J.
Jansen-Winkeln, B.
Knaebel, H. P.
Bechstein, W. O.
author_sort Moench, C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in liver surgery over the past decades, hemostasis during hepatic resections remains challenging. This multicenter randomized study compares the hemostatic effect of a collagen hemostat vs. a carrier-bound fibrin sealant after hepatic resection. METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective liver resection were randomized intraoperatively to receive either the collagen hemostat (COLL) or the carrier-bound fibrin sealant (CBFS) for secondary hemostasis. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with hemostasis after 3 min. Secondary parameters were the proportions of patients with hemostasis after 5 and 10 min, the total time to hemostasis, and the complication rates during a 3 months follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients were included. In the COLL group, 53 out of 61 patients (86.9 %) achieved complete hemostasis within 3 min after application of the hemostat compared to 52 out of 65 patients (80.0 %) in the CBFS group. The 95 % confidence interval for this difference [−6.0 %, 19.8 %] does not include the lower noninferiority margin (−10 %). Thus, the COLL treatment can be regarded as noninferior to the comparator. The proportions of patients with hemostasis after 3, 5, and 10 min were not significantly different between the two study arms. Postoperative mortality and morbidity were similar in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The collagen hemostat is as effective as the carrier-bound fibrin sealant in obtaining secondary hemostasis during liver resection with a comparable complication rate. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00423-014-1203-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4099526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40995262014-07-18 Randomized controlled multicenter trial on the effectiveness of the collagen hemostat Sangustop(®) compared with a carrier-bound fibrin sealant during liver resection (ESSCALIVER study, NCT00918619) Moench, C. Mihaljevic, A. L. Hermanutz, V. Thasler, W. E. Suna, K. Diener, M. K. Seehofer, D. Mischinger, H. J. Jansen-Winkeln, B. Knaebel, H. P. Bechstein, W. O. Langenbecks Arch Surg Controlled Clinical Trial BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in liver surgery over the past decades, hemostasis during hepatic resections remains challenging. This multicenter randomized study compares the hemostatic effect of a collagen hemostat vs. a carrier-bound fibrin sealant after hepatic resection. METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective liver resection were randomized intraoperatively to receive either the collagen hemostat (COLL) or the carrier-bound fibrin sealant (CBFS) for secondary hemostasis. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with hemostasis after 3 min. Secondary parameters were the proportions of patients with hemostasis after 5 and 10 min, the total time to hemostasis, and the complication rates during a 3 months follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients were included. In the COLL group, 53 out of 61 patients (86.9 %) achieved complete hemostasis within 3 min after application of the hemostat compared to 52 out of 65 patients (80.0 %) in the CBFS group. The 95 % confidence interval for this difference [−6.0 %, 19.8 %] does not include the lower noninferiority margin (−10 %). Thus, the COLL treatment can be regarded as noninferior to the comparator. The proportions of patients with hemostasis after 3, 5, and 10 min were not significantly different between the two study arms. Postoperative mortality and morbidity were similar in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: The collagen hemostat is as effective as the carrier-bound fibrin sealant in obtaining secondary hemostasis during liver resection with a comparable complication rate. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00423-014-1203-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-06-01 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4099526/ /pubmed/24880345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-014-1203-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Controlled Clinical Trial
Moench, C.
Mihaljevic, A. L.
Hermanutz, V.
Thasler, W. E.
Suna, K.
Diener, M. K.
Seehofer, D.
Mischinger, H. J.
Jansen-Winkeln, B.
Knaebel, H. P.
Bechstein, W. O.
Randomized controlled multicenter trial on the effectiveness of the collagen hemostat Sangustop(®) compared with a carrier-bound fibrin sealant during liver resection (ESSCALIVER study, NCT00918619)
title Randomized controlled multicenter trial on the effectiveness of the collagen hemostat Sangustop(®) compared with a carrier-bound fibrin sealant during liver resection (ESSCALIVER study, NCT00918619)
title_full Randomized controlled multicenter trial on the effectiveness of the collagen hemostat Sangustop(®) compared with a carrier-bound fibrin sealant during liver resection (ESSCALIVER study, NCT00918619)
title_fullStr Randomized controlled multicenter trial on the effectiveness of the collagen hemostat Sangustop(®) compared with a carrier-bound fibrin sealant during liver resection (ESSCALIVER study, NCT00918619)
title_full_unstemmed Randomized controlled multicenter trial on the effectiveness of the collagen hemostat Sangustop(®) compared with a carrier-bound fibrin sealant during liver resection (ESSCALIVER study, NCT00918619)
title_short Randomized controlled multicenter trial on the effectiveness of the collagen hemostat Sangustop(®) compared with a carrier-bound fibrin sealant during liver resection (ESSCALIVER study, NCT00918619)
title_sort randomized controlled multicenter trial on the effectiveness of the collagen hemostat sangustop(®) compared with a carrier-bound fibrin sealant during liver resection (esscaliver study, nct00918619)
topic Controlled Clinical Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4099526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24880345
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-014-1203-9
work_keys_str_mv AT moenchc randomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialontheeffectivenessofthecollagenhemostatsangustopcomparedwithacarrierboundfibrinsealantduringliverresectionesscaliverstudynct00918619
AT mihaljevical randomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialontheeffectivenessofthecollagenhemostatsangustopcomparedwithacarrierboundfibrinsealantduringliverresectionesscaliverstudynct00918619
AT hermanutzv randomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialontheeffectivenessofthecollagenhemostatsangustopcomparedwithacarrierboundfibrinsealantduringliverresectionesscaliverstudynct00918619
AT thaslerwe randomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialontheeffectivenessofthecollagenhemostatsangustopcomparedwithacarrierboundfibrinsealantduringliverresectionesscaliverstudynct00918619
AT sunak randomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialontheeffectivenessofthecollagenhemostatsangustopcomparedwithacarrierboundfibrinsealantduringliverresectionesscaliverstudynct00918619
AT dienermk randomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialontheeffectivenessofthecollagenhemostatsangustopcomparedwithacarrierboundfibrinsealantduringliverresectionesscaliverstudynct00918619
AT seehoferd randomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialontheeffectivenessofthecollagenhemostatsangustopcomparedwithacarrierboundfibrinsealantduringliverresectionesscaliverstudynct00918619
AT mischingerhj randomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialontheeffectivenessofthecollagenhemostatsangustopcomparedwithacarrierboundfibrinsealantduringliverresectionesscaliverstudynct00918619
AT jansenwinkelnb randomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialontheeffectivenessofthecollagenhemostatsangustopcomparedwithacarrierboundfibrinsealantduringliverresectionesscaliverstudynct00918619
AT knaebelhp randomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialontheeffectivenessofthecollagenhemostatsangustopcomparedwithacarrierboundfibrinsealantduringliverresectionesscaliverstudynct00918619
AT bechsteinwo randomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialontheeffectivenessofthecollagenhemostatsangustopcomparedwithacarrierboundfibrinsealantduringliverresectionesscaliverstudynct00918619