Cargando…

Hemodynamic support with the Impella acute 100 in patients with cardiogenic chock, or high-risk coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Dens, J, Meyens, B, Maessen, J, van Ommen, V, Grübe, E
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2004
Materias:	Poster Presentation
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4099684/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2564

Ejemplares similares

Hemodynamic Support Using Percutaneous Transfemoral Impella 5.0 and Impella RP for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock
por: Dalal, Pratik K., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high‐risk percutaneous coronary revascularization
por: Tarantini, Giuseppe, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cost-effectiveness analysis of coronary arteries bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through drug stent in iran: a comparative study
por: Fakhrzad, NourolHoda, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Strategies under Hemodynamic Support for Cardiogenic Shock: A Single-Center Experience with Two Patients
por: Ahmed, Talha, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Pre-PCI versus immediate post-PCI Impella initiation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
por: Hemradj, Veemal V., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

PCI or CABG for left main coronary artery disease: the SWEDEHEART registry
por: Persson, Jonas, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

PCI or CABG, That is the Question!
por: Woo, Jong Shin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

PCI versus CABG in patients with complex coronary artery disease: Time for reconciliation?
por: ElGuindy, Ahmed M, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Addressing unmeasured confounding bias with a prior knowledge guided approach: coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with stable ischemic heart disease
por: Duan, Lewei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Renal Protection and Hemodynamic Improvement by Impella(®) Microaxial Pump in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock
por: Patsalis, Nikolaos, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella CP hemodynamic support. A case series and method presentation
por: Sukiennik, Adam, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Fill Two Needs With One Deed! Single-Access Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Impella Hemodynamic Support
por: Ahmed, Taha, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Percutaneous coronary intervention using new-generation drug-eluting stents versus coronary arterial bypass grafting in stable patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease: From the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG registry Cohort-3
por: Watanabe, Hiroki, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Novel Porcine Model of Coronary Dissection Reveals the Impact of Impella on Dissected Coronary Arterial Hemodynamics
por: Kariya, Taro, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Corrigendum: Novel Porcine Model of Coronary Dissection Reveals the Impact of Impella on Dissected Coronary Arterial Hemodynamics
por: Kariya, Taro, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock and Severe Acute Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Rescued by Primary Coronary Intervention Under Hemodynamic Support With Impella
por: Koiwaya, Hiroshi, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Impact of the Risk Factors in the Evolution of the Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis Treated with PCI or CABG
por: TRAȘCĂ, SP, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Lifestyle adaptation of the patient post coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG)
por: Du Toit, C, et al.
Publicado: (2003)

Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Supported by Impella: Implications of Advanced Age and Refractory Shock on Outcomes
por: Boshara, Andrew, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Mechanical circulatory support for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions and cardiogenic shock: Rationale and design of the multicenter, investigator-initiated IMPELLA-PL registry
por: Pietrasik, Arkadiusz, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Mechanical Assist Device-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Use of Impella Versus Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as an Emerging Frontier in Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock
por: Vora, Neel, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Long-Term Mortality of 306,868 Patients with Multi-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: CABG versus PCI
por: Efird, Jimmy T., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Long-term outcomes of PCI vs. CABG for ostial/midshaft lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery
por: Guo, Cheng-Long, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The Effect of Enhanced External Counterpulsation (EECP) on Quality of life in Patient with Coronary Artery Disease not Amenable to PCI or CABG
por: Jan, Rafiullah, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Modifiers of the Risk of Diabetes for Long-Term Outcomes After Coronary Revascularization: CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry
por: Yamaji, Kyohei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the era of Advanced PCI
por: Kusu-Orkar, Ter-Er, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The effect of ejection fraction on mortality in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) patients
por: Awan, Nabil Iftikhar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluation of liver function tests after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG)
por: Zakeri, Saeedeh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Impella-Assisted Intracoronary Lithotripsy of Severely Calcified Left Main Coronary Artery Bifurcation for NSTEMI With Cardiogenic Shock
por: Agrawal, Yashwant, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Mid-term outcomes of patients with PCI prior to CABG in comparison to patients with primary CABG
por: Eifert, Sandra, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Physiology-guided PCI versus CABG for left main coronary artery disease: insights from the DEFINE-LM registry
por: Warisawa, Takayuki, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Evidence based decision making between PCI and CABG
por: Collet, Carlos
Publicado: (2019)

Access site complications following Impella-supported high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions
por: Johannsen, Laura, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Single vascular access for concomitant percutaneous coronary intervention and left ventricular assistance with Impella
por: Lyra, Flávio, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A pilot study on development and feasibility of the ‘MyEducation: CABG application’ for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery
por: Noor Hanita, Z., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Impact of time factor and patient characteristics on the efficacy of PCI vs CABG for left main coronary disease: A meta-analysis
por: Qiu, Mei, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Meta-analysis of clinical adverse events after CABG vs. PCI in patients with chronic kidney disease and coronary artery disease
por: Luo, Cheng, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Axillary Artery Pseudoaneurysm Following Percutaneous Transaxillary Access for Impella Device Placement During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
por: Alharbi, Anas A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Combined pulmonary and left ventricular support with veno-pulmonary ECMO and impella 5.0 for cardiogenic shock after coronary surgery
por: Sayed, Sameh, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Assessment of Equity in Access to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Centres in Poland
por: Rój, Justyna, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_nm3uo00d91dp7a7alskq5ujfsd