Cargando…
6% 130/0.4 versus 6% 200/0.5 hydroxyethyl starch: effects on plasma volume and capillary leakage in a porcine model of septic shock
Autores principales: | Swaraj, S, Marx, G, Pedder, S, Smith, L, Stockdale, H, Leuwer, M |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4099718/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2598 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Blood substitutes consumption and coagulation changes: 200/0.5 vs 130/0.4 hydroxyethyl starch administration
por: Costa, MG, et al.
Publicado: (2003) -
Is hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 safe?
por: Haase, Nicolai, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Assessment of coagulation with 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in cesarean section
por: Oh, Chung-Sik, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 induces more renal macrophage infiltration than hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42 in an isolated renal perfusion model
por: Hüter, L, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Effects of synthetic colloids on oxidative stress and inflammatory response in hemorrhagic shock: comparison of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4, hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5, and succinylated gelatin
por: Chen, Gan, et al.
Publicado: (2013)