Cargando…
Continuous vs bolus administration of imipenem in critically ill patients with ICU-acquired pneumonia
Autores principales: | Sakka, S, Glauner, A, Bulitta, J, Kinzig-Schippers, M, Sörgel, F |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4099820/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc2700 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cost–effectiveness of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam for hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia
por: Naik, Jaesh, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Activity of imipenem/relebactam on Klebsiella pneumoniae with different mechanisms of imipenem non-susceptibility
por: Mashaly, Mervat El-Sayed, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Bioequivalence of HX575 (recombinant human epoetin alfa) and a comparator epoetin alfa after multiple intravenous administrations: an open-label randomised controlled trial
por: Sörgel, Fritz, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Community-acquired pneumonia treated on the ICU
por: Apostolidou, E, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Continuous infusion versus intermittent bolus of ceftazidime for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia
por: Lorente, L, et al.
Publicado: (2003)