Cargando…

Smear Layer Removal in the Apical Third of Root Canals by Two Chelating Agents and Laser: A Comparative in vitro Study

Introduction: Smear layer (SL) is produced as a result of mechanical instrumentation of the canal(s). Despite the controversies regarding its removal, the evidence-based trend has shifted towards removing and eliminating the SL. Different methods have been used to remove the SL and the aim of this i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ashraf, Hengameh, Asnaashari, Mohammad, Darmiani, Soheila, Birang, Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4099954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25031596
_version_ 1782326583074226176
author Ashraf, Hengameh
Asnaashari, Mohammad
Darmiani, Soheila
Birang, Reza
author_facet Ashraf, Hengameh
Asnaashari, Mohammad
Darmiani, Soheila
Birang, Reza
author_sort Ashraf, Hengameh
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Smear layer (SL) is produced as a result of mechanical instrumentation of the canal(s). Despite the controversies regarding its removal, the evidence-based trend has shifted towards removing and eliminating the SL. Different methods have been used to remove the SL and the aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the ability of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 18% etidronate and Er: YAG on effective removal of the SL. Methods and Materials: Fifty straight single-rooted teeth were divided into three experimental groups (n=15) and one control group of five. The canals were instrumented with HERO 642 rotary files up to 30/0.06. In group 1, canals were irradiated with Er: YAG laser; in groups 2 and 3, canals were irrigated with 17% EDTA and 18% etidronate, respectively. In group 4 (control) distilled water was used for canal irrigation. The amount of remaining SL was quantified according to Hulsmann’s method with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data was analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (P<0.05). Results: The results showed statistically significant differences in terms of SL removal among the groups (P<0.05). The amount of removed SL by EDTA was significantly greater followed by Er: YAG laser and 18% etidronate. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, EDTA was more effective in removing SL compared to Er: YAG and etidronate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4099954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40999542014-07-16 Smear Layer Removal in the Apical Third of Root Canals by Two Chelating Agents and Laser: A Comparative in vitro Study Ashraf, Hengameh Asnaashari, Mohammad Darmiani, Soheila Birang, Reza Iran Endod J Original Article Introduction: Smear layer (SL) is produced as a result of mechanical instrumentation of the canal(s). Despite the controversies regarding its removal, the evidence-based trend has shifted towards removing and eliminating the SL. Different methods have been used to remove the SL and the aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the ability of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 18% etidronate and Er: YAG on effective removal of the SL. Methods and Materials: Fifty straight single-rooted teeth were divided into three experimental groups (n=15) and one control group of five. The canals were instrumented with HERO 642 rotary files up to 30/0.06. In group 1, canals were irradiated with Er: YAG laser; in groups 2 and 3, canals were irrigated with 17% EDTA and 18% etidronate, respectively. In group 4 (control) distilled water was used for canal irrigation. The amount of remaining SL was quantified according to Hulsmann’s method with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data was analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (P<0.05). Results: The results showed statistically significant differences in terms of SL removal among the groups (P<0.05). The amount of removed SL by EDTA was significantly greater followed by Er: YAG laser and 18% etidronate. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, EDTA was more effective in removing SL compared to Er: YAG and etidronate. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2014 2014-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4099954/ /pubmed/25031596 Text en © 2014, Iranian Center for Endodontic Research This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ashraf, Hengameh
Asnaashari, Mohammad
Darmiani, Soheila
Birang, Reza
Smear Layer Removal in the Apical Third of Root Canals by Two Chelating Agents and Laser: A Comparative in vitro Study
title Smear Layer Removal in the Apical Third of Root Canals by Two Chelating Agents and Laser: A Comparative in vitro Study
title_full Smear Layer Removal in the Apical Third of Root Canals by Two Chelating Agents and Laser: A Comparative in vitro Study
title_fullStr Smear Layer Removal in the Apical Third of Root Canals by Two Chelating Agents and Laser: A Comparative in vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Smear Layer Removal in the Apical Third of Root Canals by Two Chelating Agents and Laser: A Comparative in vitro Study
title_short Smear Layer Removal in the Apical Third of Root Canals by Two Chelating Agents and Laser: A Comparative in vitro Study
title_sort smear layer removal in the apical third of root canals by two chelating agents and laser: a comparative in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4099954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25031596
work_keys_str_mv AT ashrafhengameh smearlayerremovalintheapicalthirdofrootcanalsbytwochelatingagentsandlaseracomparativeinvitrostudy
AT asnaasharimohammad smearlayerremovalintheapicalthirdofrootcanalsbytwochelatingagentsandlaseracomparativeinvitrostudy
AT darmianisoheila smearlayerremovalintheapicalthirdofrootcanalsbytwochelatingagentsandlaseracomparativeinvitrostudy
AT birangreza smearlayerremovalintheapicalthirdofrootcanalsbytwochelatingagentsandlaseracomparativeinvitrostudy