Cargando…

Radiation therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: comparison of two brachytherapy schedules

We compared the survival rates and late effects for two groups of cervical cancer patients treated with almost the same external radiotherapy but different remote afterloading systems (RALS) for high-dose-rate intracavitary radiation therapy regimens. A total of 218 patients with carcinoma of the ut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chatani, Masashi, Tsuboi, Kazuki, Yagi, Masayuki, Fujiwara, Kanta, Tachimoto, Rika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4099986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24563532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrt226
_version_ 1782326588778479616
author Chatani, Masashi
Tsuboi, Kazuki
Yagi, Masayuki
Fujiwara, Kanta
Tachimoto, Rika
author_facet Chatani, Masashi
Tsuboi, Kazuki
Yagi, Masayuki
Fujiwara, Kanta
Tachimoto, Rika
author_sort Chatani, Masashi
collection PubMed
description We compared the survival rates and late effects for two groups of cervical cancer patients treated with almost the same external radiotherapy but different remote afterloading systems (RALS) for high-dose-rate intracavitary radiation therapy regimens. A total of 218 patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix were treated. For 98 patients, intracavitary brachytherapy was delivered with 6–7.5 Gy/fraction to Point A (Group A), and for 120, 5 Gy/fraction with a modified source step size (Group B). The 3-year cause-specific survival rates by stage and treatment schedule were Group A: 91% and Group B: 96% in Stage I, 89% and 92% in Stage II, 64% and 75% in Stage III, 44% and 69% in Stage IV. The survival curves did not reveal any statistically significant differences at any stage. The 3-year cumulative local failure rates were 14% in Group A and 7% in Group B (P = 0.1202), while the actuarial rates of developing rectal complication (Grade 2 or more) at 3 years were 25% in Group A and 4% in Group B (P < 0.0001). This retrospective analysis suggests that a low dose per fraction with modified source step size is advantageous because of yielding almost the same local control but with fewer rectal complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4099986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-40999862014-08-12 Radiation therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: comparison of two brachytherapy schedules Chatani, Masashi Tsuboi, Kazuki Yagi, Masayuki Fujiwara, Kanta Tachimoto, Rika J Radiat Res Oncology We compared the survival rates and late effects for two groups of cervical cancer patients treated with almost the same external radiotherapy but different remote afterloading systems (RALS) for high-dose-rate intracavitary radiation therapy regimens. A total of 218 patients with carcinoma of the uterine cervix were treated. For 98 patients, intracavitary brachytherapy was delivered with 6–7.5 Gy/fraction to Point A (Group A), and for 120, 5 Gy/fraction with a modified source step size (Group B). The 3-year cause-specific survival rates by stage and treatment schedule were Group A: 91% and Group B: 96% in Stage I, 89% and 92% in Stage II, 64% and 75% in Stage III, 44% and 69% in Stage IV. The survival curves did not reveal any statistically significant differences at any stage. The 3-year cumulative local failure rates were 14% in Group A and 7% in Group B (P = 0.1202), while the actuarial rates of developing rectal complication (Grade 2 or more) at 3 years were 25% in Group A and 4% in Group B (P < 0.0001). This retrospective analysis suggests that a low dose per fraction with modified source step size is advantageous because of yielding almost the same local control but with fewer rectal complications. Oxford University Press 2014-07 2014-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4099986/ /pubmed/24563532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrt226 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oncology
Chatani, Masashi
Tsuboi, Kazuki
Yagi, Masayuki
Fujiwara, Kanta
Tachimoto, Rika
Radiation therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: comparison of two brachytherapy schedules
title Radiation therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: comparison of two brachytherapy schedules
title_full Radiation therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: comparison of two brachytherapy schedules
title_fullStr Radiation therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: comparison of two brachytherapy schedules
title_full_unstemmed Radiation therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: comparison of two brachytherapy schedules
title_short Radiation therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: comparison of two brachytherapy schedules
title_sort radiation therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: comparison of two brachytherapy schedules
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4099986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24563532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrt226
work_keys_str_mv AT chatanimasashi radiationtherapyforcarcinomaoftheuterinecervixcomparisonoftwobrachytherapyschedules
AT tsuboikazuki radiationtherapyforcarcinomaoftheuterinecervixcomparisonoftwobrachytherapyschedules
AT yagimasayuki radiationtherapyforcarcinomaoftheuterinecervixcomparisonoftwobrachytherapyschedules
AT fujiwarakanta radiationtherapyforcarcinomaoftheuterinecervixcomparisonoftwobrachytherapyschedules
AT tachimotorika radiationtherapyforcarcinomaoftheuterinecervixcomparisonoftwobrachytherapyschedules