Cargando…
Comparing the effect of a decision aid plus patient navigation with usual care on colorectal cancer screening completion in vulnerable populations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Screening can reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. However, screening is underutilized in vulnerable patient populations, particularly among Latinos. Patient-directed decision aids can increase CRC screening knowledge, self-efficacy, and intent; however, their effect o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4100055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25004983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-275 |
_version_ | 1782326604576325632 |
---|---|
author | Brenner, Alison T Getrich, Christina M Pignone, Michael Rhyne, Robert L Hoffman, Richard M McWilliams, Andrew de Hernandez, Brisa Urquieta Weaver, Mark A Tapp, Hazel Harbi, Khalil Reuland, Daniel |
author_facet | Brenner, Alison T Getrich, Christina M Pignone, Michael Rhyne, Robert L Hoffman, Richard M McWilliams, Andrew de Hernandez, Brisa Urquieta Weaver, Mark A Tapp, Hazel Harbi, Khalil Reuland, Daniel |
author_sort | Brenner, Alison T |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Screening can reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. However, screening is underutilized in vulnerable patient populations, particularly among Latinos. Patient-directed decision aids can increase CRC screening knowledge, self-efficacy, and intent; however, their effect on actual screening test completion tends to be modest. This is probably because decision aids do not address some of the patient-specific barriers that prevent successful completion of CRC screening in these populations. These individual barriers might be addressed though patient navigation interventions. This study will test a combined decision aid and patient navigator intervention on screening completion in diverse populations of vulnerable primary care patients. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a multisite, randomized controlled trial with patient-level randomization. Planned enrollment is 300 patients aged 50 to 75 years at average CRC risk presenting for appointments at two primary clinics in North Carolina and New Mexico. Intervention participants will view a video decision aid immediately before the clinic visit. The 14 to 16 minute video presents information about fecal occult blood tests and colonoscopy and will be viewed on a portable computer tablet in English or Spanish. Clinic-based patient navigators are bilingual and bicultural and will provide both face-to-face and telephone-based navigation. Control participants will view an unrelated food safety video and receive usual care. The primary outcome is completion of a CRC screening test at six months. Planned subgroup analyses include examining intervention effectiveness in Latinos, who will be oversampled. Secondarily, the trial will evaluate the intervention effects on knowledge of CRC screening, self-efficacy, intent, and patient-provider communication. The study will also examine whether patient ethnicity, acculturation, language preference, or health insurance status moderate the intervention effect on CRC screening. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic randomized controlled trial will test a combined decision aid and patient navigator intervention targeting CRC screening completion. Findings from this trial may inform future interventions and implementation policies designed to promote CRC screening in vulnerable patient populations and to reduce screening disparities. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02054598. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4100055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41000552014-07-17 Comparing the effect of a decision aid plus patient navigation with usual care on colorectal cancer screening completion in vulnerable populations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Brenner, Alison T Getrich, Christina M Pignone, Michael Rhyne, Robert L Hoffman, Richard M McWilliams, Andrew de Hernandez, Brisa Urquieta Weaver, Mark A Tapp, Hazel Harbi, Khalil Reuland, Daniel Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Screening can reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. However, screening is underutilized in vulnerable patient populations, particularly among Latinos. Patient-directed decision aids can increase CRC screening knowledge, self-efficacy, and intent; however, their effect on actual screening test completion tends to be modest. This is probably because decision aids do not address some of the patient-specific barriers that prevent successful completion of CRC screening in these populations. These individual barriers might be addressed though patient navigation interventions. This study will test a combined decision aid and patient navigator intervention on screening completion in diverse populations of vulnerable primary care patients. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a multisite, randomized controlled trial with patient-level randomization. Planned enrollment is 300 patients aged 50 to 75 years at average CRC risk presenting for appointments at two primary clinics in North Carolina and New Mexico. Intervention participants will view a video decision aid immediately before the clinic visit. The 14 to 16 minute video presents information about fecal occult blood tests and colonoscopy and will be viewed on a portable computer tablet in English or Spanish. Clinic-based patient navigators are bilingual and bicultural and will provide both face-to-face and telephone-based navigation. Control participants will view an unrelated food safety video and receive usual care. The primary outcome is completion of a CRC screening test at six months. Planned subgroup analyses include examining intervention effectiveness in Latinos, who will be oversampled. Secondarily, the trial will evaluate the intervention effects on knowledge of CRC screening, self-efficacy, intent, and patient-provider communication. The study will also examine whether patient ethnicity, acculturation, language preference, or health insurance status moderate the intervention effect on CRC screening. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic randomized controlled trial will test a combined decision aid and patient navigator intervention targeting CRC screening completion. Findings from this trial may inform future interventions and implementation policies designed to promote CRC screening in vulnerable patient populations and to reduce screening disparities. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02054598. BioMed Central 2014-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4100055/ /pubmed/25004983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-275 Text en Copyright © 2014 Brenner et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Brenner, Alison T Getrich, Christina M Pignone, Michael Rhyne, Robert L Hoffman, Richard M McWilliams, Andrew de Hernandez, Brisa Urquieta Weaver, Mark A Tapp, Hazel Harbi, Khalil Reuland, Daniel Comparing the effect of a decision aid plus patient navigation with usual care on colorectal cancer screening completion in vulnerable populations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparing the effect of a decision aid plus patient navigation with usual care on colorectal cancer screening completion in vulnerable populations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparing the effect of a decision aid plus patient navigation with usual care on colorectal cancer screening completion in vulnerable populations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparing the effect of a decision aid plus patient navigation with usual care on colorectal cancer screening completion in vulnerable populations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the effect of a decision aid plus patient navigation with usual care on colorectal cancer screening completion in vulnerable populations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparing the effect of a decision aid plus patient navigation with usual care on colorectal cancer screening completion in vulnerable populations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparing the effect of a decision aid plus patient navigation with usual care on colorectal cancer screening completion in vulnerable populations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4100055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25004983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-275 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brenneralisont comparingtheeffectofadecisionaidpluspatientnavigationwithusualcareoncolorectalcancerscreeningcompletioninvulnerablepopulationsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT getrichchristinam comparingtheeffectofadecisionaidpluspatientnavigationwithusualcareoncolorectalcancerscreeningcompletioninvulnerablepopulationsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pignonemichael comparingtheeffectofadecisionaidpluspatientnavigationwithusualcareoncolorectalcancerscreeningcompletioninvulnerablepopulationsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rhynerobertl comparingtheeffectofadecisionaidpluspatientnavigationwithusualcareoncolorectalcancerscreeningcompletioninvulnerablepopulationsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hoffmanrichardm comparingtheeffectofadecisionaidpluspatientnavigationwithusualcareoncolorectalcancerscreeningcompletioninvulnerablepopulationsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mcwilliamsandrew comparingtheeffectofadecisionaidpluspatientnavigationwithusualcareoncolorectalcancerscreeningcompletioninvulnerablepopulationsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dehernandezbrisaurquieta comparingtheeffectofadecisionaidpluspatientnavigationwithusualcareoncolorectalcancerscreeningcompletioninvulnerablepopulationsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT weavermarka comparingtheeffectofadecisionaidpluspatientnavigationwithusualcareoncolorectalcancerscreeningcompletioninvulnerablepopulationsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tapphazel comparingtheeffectofadecisionaidpluspatientnavigationwithusualcareoncolorectalcancerscreeningcompletioninvulnerablepopulationsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT harbikhalil comparingtheeffectofadecisionaidpluspatientnavigationwithusualcareoncolorectalcancerscreeningcompletioninvulnerablepopulationsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT reulanddaniel comparingtheeffectofadecisionaidpluspatientnavigationwithusualcareoncolorectalcancerscreeningcompletioninvulnerablepopulationsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |