Cargando…

Endoscopic Measurement of Polyp Size Using a Novel Calibrated Hood

Background. Although the size of colon polyps is an important risk factor for colorectal cancer, a standardized measurement technique has yet to be determined. In clinical practice, most endoscopists estimate polyp size by uncertain visual estimation; however, colonoscopic polypectomy is indicated f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kume, Keiichiro, Watanabe, Tatsuyuki, Yoshikawa, Ichiro, Harada, Masaru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4100290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25093021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/714294
_version_ 1782326649856983040
author Kume, Keiichiro
Watanabe, Tatsuyuki
Yoshikawa, Ichiro
Harada, Masaru
author_facet Kume, Keiichiro
Watanabe, Tatsuyuki
Yoshikawa, Ichiro
Harada, Masaru
author_sort Kume, Keiichiro
collection PubMed
description Background. Although the size of colon polyps is an important risk factor for colorectal cancer, a standardized measurement technique has yet to be determined. In clinical practice, most endoscopists estimate polyp size by uncertain visual estimation; however, colonoscopic polypectomy is indicated for adenomatous polyps more than 5 mm in diameter. We have therefore developed a novel calibrated hood that enables accurate measurement of polyp size during colonoscopy. Method. We compared prepolypectomy estimates using the calibrated hood against measurements of preformalin-fixed samples immediately after polypectomy. Results. Sixty-five polyps removed from 44 patients were included in the present study. The mean size of polyps was significantly larger at prepolypectomy (6.06 ± 1.23 mm) than after polypectomy (5.48 ± 1.31 mm, P < 0.05). Conclusion. Accurately measuring the size of polyps during colonoscopy is important, since polyps are shrunk by polypectomy. Attaching the calibrated hood appears useful in the measurement of polyp size to determine indications for polypectomy in patients with colon polyps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4100290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41002902014-08-04 Endoscopic Measurement of Polyp Size Using a Novel Calibrated Hood Kume, Keiichiro Watanabe, Tatsuyuki Yoshikawa, Ichiro Harada, Masaru Gastroenterol Res Pract Clinical Study Background. Although the size of colon polyps is an important risk factor for colorectal cancer, a standardized measurement technique has yet to be determined. In clinical practice, most endoscopists estimate polyp size by uncertain visual estimation; however, colonoscopic polypectomy is indicated for adenomatous polyps more than 5 mm in diameter. We have therefore developed a novel calibrated hood that enables accurate measurement of polyp size during colonoscopy. Method. We compared prepolypectomy estimates using the calibrated hood against measurements of preformalin-fixed samples immediately after polypectomy. Results. Sixty-five polyps removed from 44 patients were included in the present study. The mean size of polyps was significantly larger at prepolypectomy (6.06 ± 1.23 mm) than after polypectomy (5.48 ± 1.31 mm, P < 0.05). Conclusion. Accurately measuring the size of polyps during colonoscopy is important, since polyps are shrunk by polypectomy. Attaching the calibrated hood appears useful in the measurement of polyp size to determine indications for polypectomy in patients with colon polyps. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4100290/ /pubmed/25093021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/714294 Text en Copyright © 2014 Keiichiro Kume et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Kume, Keiichiro
Watanabe, Tatsuyuki
Yoshikawa, Ichiro
Harada, Masaru
Endoscopic Measurement of Polyp Size Using a Novel Calibrated Hood
title Endoscopic Measurement of Polyp Size Using a Novel Calibrated Hood
title_full Endoscopic Measurement of Polyp Size Using a Novel Calibrated Hood
title_fullStr Endoscopic Measurement of Polyp Size Using a Novel Calibrated Hood
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic Measurement of Polyp Size Using a Novel Calibrated Hood
title_short Endoscopic Measurement of Polyp Size Using a Novel Calibrated Hood
title_sort endoscopic measurement of polyp size using a novel calibrated hood
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4100290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25093021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/714294
work_keys_str_mv AT kumekeiichiro endoscopicmeasurementofpolypsizeusinganovelcalibratedhood
AT watanabetatsuyuki endoscopicmeasurementofpolypsizeusinganovelcalibratedhood
AT yoshikawaichiro endoscopicmeasurementofpolypsizeusinganovelcalibratedhood
AT haradamasaru endoscopicmeasurementofpolypsizeusinganovelcalibratedhood