Cargando…

A Comparison between Gadofosveset Trisodium and Gadobenate Dimeglumine for Steady State MRA of the Thoracic Vasculature

Purpose. Retrospective comparison between gadofosveset trisodium and gadobenate dimeglumine steady state magnetic resonance angiography (SS-MRA) of the thoracic vasculature at 1.5T using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and vessel edge sharpness (ES) as markers of image quality. Materials and Methods. IR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Camren, G. Paul, Wilson, Gregory J., Bamra, Vikram R., Nguyen, Khahn Q., Hippe, Daniel S., Maki, Jeffrey H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4100356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/625614
_version_ 1782326657942552576
author Camren, G. Paul
Wilson, Gregory J.
Bamra, Vikram R.
Nguyen, Khahn Q.
Hippe, Daniel S.
Maki, Jeffrey H.
author_facet Camren, G. Paul
Wilson, Gregory J.
Bamra, Vikram R.
Nguyen, Khahn Q.
Hippe, Daniel S.
Maki, Jeffrey H.
author_sort Camren, G. Paul
collection PubMed
description Purpose. Retrospective comparison between gadofosveset trisodium and gadobenate dimeglumine steady state magnetic resonance angiography (SS-MRA) of the thoracic vasculature at 1.5T using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and vessel edge sharpness (ES) as markers of image quality. Materials and Methods. IRB approval was obtained. Twenty separate patients each underwent SS-MRA using high-resolution 3D ECG-triggered coronal IR-TFE at 1.5T approximately 3-4 minutes following 10 or 15 mL gadofosveset or 20 mL gadobenate. ROIs were placed in the right atrium, left ventricle, left atrium, ascending aorta, descending aorta, and right pulmonary artery to estimate SNR. Vessel ES was estimated as 20–80% rise distances from line intensity profiles in the left pulmonary vein, ascending aorta, and descending aorta. Data were analyzed using nonpaired Student's t-test (threshold for significance set at P < 0.05). Results. There was no significant difference in mean SNR for the gadofosveset or gadobenate groups (P values: 0.14 to 0.85). There was no significant difference in mean vessel ES for gadofosveset and gadobenate groups (P values: 0.17 to 0.78). Conclusion. High quality thoracic SS-MRA can be achieved with gadobenate dimeglumine, similar to that achieved with the blood pool agent gadofosveset trisodium provided that imaging is initiated quickly (3-4 min) after contrast injection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4100356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41003562014-07-24 A Comparison between Gadofosveset Trisodium and Gadobenate Dimeglumine for Steady State MRA of the Thoracic Vasculature Camren, G. Paul Wilson, Gregory J. Bamra, Vikram R. Nguyen, Khahn Q. Hippe, Daniel S. Maki, Jeffrey H. Biomed Res Int Research Article Purpose. Retrospective comparison between gadofosveset trisodium and gadobenate dimeglumine steady state magnetic resonance angiography (SS-MRA) of the thoracic vasculature at 1.5T using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and vessel edge sharpness (ES) as markers of image quality. Materials and Methods. IRB approval was obtained. Twenty separate patients each underwent SS-MRA using high-resolution 3D ECG-triggered coronal IR-TFE at 1.5T approximately 3-4 minutes following 10 or 15 mL gadofosveset or 20 mL gadobenate. ROIs were placed in the right atrium, left ventricle, left atrium, ascending aorta, descending aorta, and right pulmonary artery to estimate SNR. Vessel ES was estimated as 20–80% rise distances from line intensity profiles in the left pulmonary vein, ascending aorta, and descending aorta. Data were analyzed using nonpaired Student's t-test (threshold for significance set at P < 0.05). Results. There was no significant difference in mean SNR for the gadofosveset or gadobenate groups (P values: 0.14 to 0.85). There was no significant difference in mean vessel ES for gadofosveset and gadobenate groups (P values: 0.17 to 0.78). Conclusion. High quality thoracic SS-MRA can be achieved with gadobenate dimeglumine, similar to that achieved with the blood pool agent gadofosveset trisodium provided that imaging is initiated quickly (3-4 min) after contrast injection. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4100356/ /pubmed/25061611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/625614 Text en Copyright © 2014 G. Paul Camren et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Camren, G. Paul
Wilson, Gregory J.
Bamra, Vikram R.
Nguyen, Khahn Q.
Hippe, Daniel S.
Maki, Jeffrey H.
A Comparison between Gadofosveset Trisodium and Gadobenate Dimeglumine for Steady State MRA of the Thoracic Vasculature
title A Comparison between Gadofosveset Trisodium and Gadobenate Dimeglumine for Steady State MRA of the Thoracic Vasculature
title_full A Comparison between Gadofosveset Trisodium and Gadobenate Dimeglumine for Steady State MRA of the Thoracic Vasculature
title_fullStr A Comparison between Gadofosveset Trisodium and Gadobenate Dimeglumine for Steady State MRA of the Thoracic Vasculature
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison between Gadofosveset Trisodium and Gadobenate Dimeglumine for Steady State MRA of the Thoracic Vasculature
title_short A Comparison between Gadofosveset Trisodium and Gadobenate Dimeglumine for Steady State MRA of the Thoracic Vasculature
title_sort comparison between gadofosveset trisodium and gadobenate dimeglumine for steady state mra of the thoracic vasculature
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4100356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25061611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/625614
work_keys_str_mv AT camrengpaul acomparisonbetweengadofosvesettrisodiumandgadobenatedimeglumineforsteadystatemraofthethoracicvasculature
AT wilsongregoryj acomparisonbetweengadofosvesettrisodiumandgadobenatedimeglumineforsteadystatemraofthethoracicvasculature
AT bamravikramr acomparisonbetweengadofosvesettrisodiumandgadobenatedimeglumineforsteadystatemraofthethoracicvasculature
AT nguyenkhahnq acomparisonbetweengadofosvesettrisodiumandgadobenatedimeglumineforsteadystatemraofthethoracicvasculature
AT hippedaniels acomparisonbetweengadofosvesettrisodiumandgadobenatedimeglumineforsteadystatemraofthethoracicvasculature
AT makijeffreyh acomparisonbetweengadofosvesettrisodiumandgadobenatedimeglumineforsteadystatemraofthethoracicvasculature
AT camrengpaul comparisonbetweengadofosvesettrisodiumandgadobenatedimeglumineforsteadystatemraofthethoracicvasculature
AT wilsongregoryj comparisonbetweengadofosvesettrisodiumandgadobenatedimeglumineforsteadystatemraofthethoracicvasculature
AT bamravikramr comparisonbetweengadofosvesettrisodiumandgadobenatedimeglumineforsteadystatemraofthethoracicvasculature
AT nguyenkhahnq comparisonbetweengadofosvesettrisodiumandgadobenatedimeglumineforsteadystatemraofthethoracicvasculature
AT hippedaniels comparisonbetweengadofosvesettrisodiumandgadobenatedimeglumineforsteadystatemraofthethoracicvasculature
AT makijeffreyh comparisonbetweengadofosvesettrisodiumandgadobenatedimeglumineforsteadystatemraofthethoracicvasculature