Cargando…
Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications
Objective To investigate the planning of subgroup analyses in protocols of randomised controlled trials and the agreement with corresponding full journal publications. Design Cohort of protocols of randomised controlled trial and subsequent full journal publications. Setting Six research ethics comm...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4100616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25030633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4539 |
_version_ | 1782326697334407168 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To investigate the planning of subgroup analyses in protocols of randomised controlled trials and the agreement with corresponding full journal publications. Design Cohort of protocols of randomised controlled trial and subsequent full journal publications. Setting Six research ethics committees in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada. Data sources 894 protocols of randomised controlled trial involving patients approved by participating research ethics committees between 2000 and 2003 and 515 subsequent full journal publications. Results Of 894 protocols of randomised controlled trials, 252 (28.2%) included one or more planned subgroup analyses. Of those, 17 (6.7%) provided a clear hypothesis for at least one subgroup analysis, 10 (4.0%) anticipated the direction of a subgroup effect, and 87 (34.5%) planned a statistical test for interaction. Industry sponsored trials more often planned subgroup analyses compared with investigator sponsored trials (195/551 (35.4%) v 57/343 (16.6%), P<0.001). Of 515 identified journal publications, 246 (47.8%) reported at least one subgroup analysis. In 81 (32.9%) of the 246 publications reporting subgroup analyses, authors stated that subgroup analyses were prespecified, but this was not supported by 28 (34.6%) corresponding protocols. In 86 publications, authors claimed a subgroup effect, but only 36 (41.9%) corresponding protocols reported a planned subgroup analysis. Conclusions Subgroup analyses are insufficiently described in the protocols of randomised controlled trials submitted to research ethics committees, and investigators rarely specify the anticipated direction of subgroup effects. More than one third of statements in publications of randomised controlled trials about subgroup prespecification had no documentation in the corresponding protocols. Definitive judgments regarding credibility of claimed subgroup effects are not possible without access to protocols and analysis plans of randomised controlled trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4100616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41006162014-07-18 Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications BMJ Research Objective To investigate the planning of subgroup analyses in protocols of randomised controlled trials and the agreement with corresponding full journal publications. Design Cohort of protocols of randomised controlled trial and subsequent full journal publications. Setting Six research ethics committees in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada. Data sources 894 protocols of randomised controlled trial involving patients approved by participating research ethics committees between 2000 and 2003 and 515 subsequent full journal publications. Results Of 894 protocols of randomised controlled trials, 252 (28.2%) included one or more planned subgroup analyses. Of those, 17 (6.7%) provided a clear hypothesis for at least one subgroup analysis, 10 (4.0%) anticipated the direction of a subgroup effect, and 87 (34.5%) planned a statistical test for interaction. Industry sponsored trials more often planned subgroup analyses compared with investigator sponsored trials (195/551 (35.4%) v 57/343 (16.6%), P<0.001). Of 515 identified journal publications, 246 (47.8%) reported at least one subgroup analysis. In 81 (32.9%) of the 246 publications reporting subgroup analyses, authors stated that subgroup analyses were prespecified, but this was not supported by 28 (34.6%) corresponding protocols. In 86 publications, authors claimed a subgroup effect, but only 36 (41.9%) corresponding protocols reported a planned subgroup analysis. Conclusions Subgroup analyses are insufficiently described in the protocols of randomised controlled trials submitted to research ethics committees, and investigators rarely specify the anticipated direction of subgroup effects. More than one third of statements in publications of randomised controlled trials about subgroup prespecification had no documentation in the corresponding protocols. Definitive judgments regarding credibility of claimed subgroup effects are not possible without access to protocols and analysis plans of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2014-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4100616/ /pubmed/25030633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4539 Text en © The DISCO study group 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications |
title | Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications |
title_full | Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications |
title_fullStr | Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications |
title_full_unstemmed | Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications |
title_short | Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications |
title_sort | subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: cohort study on trial protocols and journal publications |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4100616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25030633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4539 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT subgroupanalysesinrandomisedcontrolledtrialscohortstudyontrialprotocolsandjournalpublications |