Cargando…

Systematic review automation technologies

Systematic reviews, a cornerstone of evidence-based medicine, are not produced quickly enough to support clinical practice. The cost of production, availability of the requisite expertise and timeliness are often quoted as major contributors for the delay. This detailed survey of the state of the ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsafnat, Guy, Glasziou, Paul, Choong, Miew Keen, Dunn, Adam, Galgani, Filippo, Coiera, Enrico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4100748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25005128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-74
_version_ 1782326703418245120
author Tsafnat, Guy
Glasziou, Paul
Choong, Miew Keen
Dunn, Adam
Galgani, Filippo
Coiera, Enrico
author_facet Tsafnat, Guy
Glasziou, Paul
Choong, Miew Keen
Dunn, Adam
Galgani, Filippo
Coiera, Enrico
author_sort Tsafnat, Guy
collection PubMed
description Systematic reviews, a cornerstone of evidence-based medicine, are not produced quickly enough to support clinical practice. The cost of production, availability of the requisite expertise and timeliness are often quoted as major contributors for the delay. This detailed survey of the state of the art of information systems designed to support or automate individual tasks in the systematic review, and in particular systematic reviews of randomized controlled clinical trials, reveals trends that see the convergence of several parallel research projects. We surveyed literature describing informatics systems that support or automate the processes of systematic review or each of the tasks of the systematic review. Several projects focus on automating, simplifying and/or streamlining specific tasks of the systematic review. Some tasks are already fully automated while others are still largely manual. In this review, we describe each task and the effect that its automation would have on the entire systematic review process, summarize the existing information system support for each task, and highlight where further research is needed for realizing automation for the task. Integration of the systems that automate systematic review tasks may lead to a revised systematic review workflow. We envisage the optimized workflow will lead to system in which each systematic review is described as a computer program that automatically retrieves relevant trials, appraises them, extracts and synthesizes data, evaluates the risk of bias, performs meta-analysis calculations, and produces a report in real time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4100748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41007482014-07-17 Systematic review automation technologies Tsafnat, Guy Glasziou, Paul Choong, Miew Keen Dunn, Adam Galgani, Filippo Coiera, Enrico Syst Rev Commentary Systematic reviews, a cornerstone of evidence-based medicine, are not produced quickly enough to support clinical practice. The cost of production, availability of the requisite expertise and timeliness are often quoted as major contributors for the delay. This detailed survey of the state of the art of information systems designed to support or automate individual tasks in the systematic review, and in particular systematic reviews of randomized controlled clinical trials, reveals trends that see the convergence of several parallel research projects. We surveyed literature describing informatics systems that support or automate the processes of systematic review or each of the tasks of the systematic review. Several projects focus on automating, simplifying and/or streamlining specific tasks of the systematic review. Some tasks are already fully automated while others are still largely manual. In this review, we describe each task and the effect that its automation would have on the entire systematic review process, summarize the existing information system support for each task, and highlight where further research is needed for realizing automation for the task. Integration of the systems that automate systematic review tasks may lead to a revised systematic review workflow. We envisage the optimized workflow will lead to system in which each systematic review is described as a computer program that automatically retrieves relevant trials, appraises them, extracts and synthesizes data, evaluates the risk of bias, performs meta-analysis calculations, and produces a report in real time. BioMed Central 2014-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4100748/ /pubmed/25005128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-74 Text en Copyright © 2014 Tsafnat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Tsafnat, Guy
Glasziou, Paul
Choong, Miew Keen
Dunn, Adam
Galgani, Filippo
Coiera, Enrico
Systematic review automation technologies
title Systematic review automation technologies
title_full Systematic review automation technologies
title_fullStr Systematic review automation technologies
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review automation technologies
title_short Systematic review automation technologies
title_sort systematic review automation technologies
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4100748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25005128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-74
work_keys_str_mv AT tsafnatguy systematicreviewautomationtechnologies
AT glaszioupaul systematicreviewautomationtechnologies
AT choongmiewkeen systematicreviewautomationtechnologies
AT dunnadam systematicreviewautomationtechnologies
AT galganifilippo systematicreviewautomationtechnologies
AT coieraenrico systematicreviewautomationtechnologies