Cargando…

Genomic profile of ovarian carcinomas

BACKGROUND: It is known that all tumors studied in sufficient number to draw conclusions show characteristic/specific chromosomal rearrangements, and the identification of these chromosomes and the genes rearranged behind the aberrations may ultimately lead to a tailor-made therapy for each cancer p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Micci, Francesca, Haugom, Lisbeth, Abeler, Vera M, Davidson, Ben, Tropé, Claes G, Heim, Sverre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4101829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24886194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-315
_version_ 1782480961725792256
author Micci, Francesca
Haugom, Lisbeth
Abeler, Vera M
Davidson, Ben
Tropé, Claes G
Heim, Sverre
author_facet Micci, Francesca
Haugom, Lisbeth
Abeler, Vera M
Davidson, Ben
Tropé, Claes G
Heim, Sverre
author_sort Micci, Francesca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is known that all tumors studied in sufficient number to draw conclusions show characteristic/specific chromosomal rearrangements, and the identification of these chromosomes and the genes rearranged behind the aberrations may ultimately lead to a tailor-made therapy for each cancer patient. Knowledge about the acquired genomic aberrations of ovarian carcinomas is still unsatisfactory. METHODS: We cytogenetically analyzed 110 new cases of ovarian carcinoma of different histological subtypes using karyotyping of G-banded chromosomes and high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization. We first compared the aberration patterns identified by the two genomic screening techniques using the so-called “classical” pathological classification in which the carcinomas are grouped as tumors of types I and II. We also broke down our findings according to the more “modern” classification which groups the carcinomas in five different categories. RESULTS: The chromosomal breakpoints identified by karyotyping tended to cluster to 19p/q and to 11q, but no unquestionably recurrent rearrangement could be seen. Common imbalances were scored as gains from 1q, 3q, 7q, and 8q and losses from 17p, 19q, and 22q. Gain of material from 8q23 and losses from 19q and 22q have previously been described at high frequencies in bilateral and borderline ovarian carcinomas. The fact that they were present both in “precursor” lesions, i.e., borderline tumors, as well as in tumors of more advanced stages, i.e., carcinomas, highlights the possibility of an adenoma-carcinoma sequence in ovarian carcinogenesis. CONCLUSION: Based on the relatively simple genomic changes we identified in the low-grade serous carcinomas examined (n = 7) and which largely corresponded to the aberration pattern formerly identified in borderline tumors, one can interpret the cytogenetic data as supporting the view that the low-grade carcinomas represent a phenotypically more advanced stage of borderline tumors. Whether transition from low-grade to high-grade carcinoma also occurs, is a question about which the genomic data is still inconclusive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4101829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41018292014-07-18 Genomic profile of ovarian carcinomas Micci, Francesca Haugom, Lisbeth Abeler, Vera M Davidson, Ben Tropé, Claes G Heim, Sverre BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: It is known that all tumors studied in sufficient number to draw conclusions show characteristic/specific chromosomal rearrangements, and the identification of these chromosomes and the genes rearranged behind the aberrations may ultimately lead to a tailor-made therapy for each cancer patient. Knowledge about the acquired genomic aberrations of ovarian carcinomas is still unsatisfactory. METHODS: We cytogenetically analyzed 110 new cases of ovarian carcinoma of different histological subtypes using karyotyping of G-banded chromosomes and high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization. We first compared the aberration patterns identified by the two genomic screening techniques using the so-called “classical” pathological classification in which the carcinomas are grouped as tumors of types I and II. We also broke down our findings according to the more “modern” classification which groups the carcinomas in five different categories. RESULTS: The chromosomal breakpoints identified by karyotyping tended to cluster to 19p/q and to 11q, but no unquestionably recurrent rearrangement could be seen. Common imbalances were scored as gains from 1q, 3q, 7q, and 8q and losses from 17p, 19q, and 22q. Gain of material from 8q23 and losses from 19q and 22q have previously been described at high frequencies in bilateral and borderline ovarian carcinomas. The fact that they were present both in “precursor” lesions, i.e., borderline tumors, as well as in tumors of more advanced stages, i.e., carcinomas, highlights the possibility of an adenoma-carcinoma sequence in ovarian carcinogenesis. CONCLUSION: Based on the relatively simple genomic changes we identified in the low-grade serous carcinomas examined (n = 7) and which largely corresponded to the aberration pattern formerly identified in borderline tumors, one can interpret the cytogenetic data as supporting the view that the low-grade carcinomas represent a phenotypically more advanced stage of borderline tumors. Whether transition from low-grade to high-grade carcinoma also occurs, is a question about which the genomic data is still inconclusive. BioMed Central 2014-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4101829/ /pubmed/24886194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-315 Text en Copyright © 2014 Micci et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Micci, Francesca
Haugom, Lisbeth
Abeler, Vera M
Davidson, Ben
Tropé, Claes G
Heim, Sverre
Genomic profile of ovarian carcinomas
title Genomic profile of ovarian carcinomas
title_full Genomic profile of ovarian carcinomas
title_fullStr Genomic profile of ovarian carcinomas
title_full_unstemmed Genomic profile of ovarian carcinomas
title_short Genomic profile of ovarian carcinomas
title_sort genomic profile of ovarian carcinomas
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4101829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24886194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-315
work_keys_str_mv AT miccifrancesca genomicprofileofovariancarcinomas
AT haugomlisbeth genomicprofileofovariancarcinomas
AT abelerveram genomicprofileofovariancarcinomas
AT davidsonben genomicprofileofovariancarcinomas
AT tropeclaesg genomicprofileofovariancarcinomas
AT heimsverre genomicprofileofovariancarcinomas