Cargando…

Depression and suicidal behavior in adolescents: a multi-informant and multi-methods approach to diagnostic classification

Background: Informant discrepancies have been reported between parent and adolescent measures of depressive disorders and suicidality. We aimed to examine the concordance between adolescent and parent ratings of depressive disorder using both clinical interview and questionnaire measures and assess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewis, Andrew J., Bertino, Melanie D., Bailey, Catherine M., Skewes, Joanna, Lubman, Dan I., Toumbourou, John W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4101965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25101031
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00766
_version_ 1782480985566216192
author Lewis, Andrew J.
Bertino, Melanie D.
Bailey, Catherine M.
Skewes, Joanna
Lubman, Dan I.
Toumbourou, John W.
author_facet Lewis, Andrew J.
Bertino, Melanie D.
Bailey, Catherine M.
Skewes, Joanna
Lubman, Dan I.
Toumbourou, John W.
author_sort Lewis, Andrew J.
collection PubMed
description Background: Informant discrepancies have been reported between parent and adolescent measures of depressive disorders and suicidality. We aimed to examine the concordance between adolescent and parent ratings of depressive disorder using both clinical interview and questionnaire measures and assess multi-informant and multi-method approaches to classification. Method: Within the context of assessment of eligibility for a randomized clinical trial, 50 parent–adolescent pairs (mean age of adolescents = 15.0 years) were interviewed separately with a structured diagnostic interview for depression, the KID-SCID. Adolescent self-report and parent-report versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire and the Depressive Experiences Questionnaire were also administered. We examined the diagnostic concordance rates of the parent vs. adolescent structured interview methods and the prediction of adolescent diagnosis via questionnaire methods. Results: Parent proxy reporting of adolescent depression and suicidal thoughts and behavior is not strongly concordant with adolescent report. Adolescent self-reported symptoms on depression scales provide a more accurate report of diagnosable adolescent depression than parent proxy reports of adolescent depressive symptoms. Adolescent self-report measures can be combined to improve the accuracy of classification. Parents tend to over report their adolescent’s depressive symptoms while under reporting their suicidal thoughts and behavior. Conclusion: Parent proxy report is clearly less reliable than the adolescent’s own report of their symptoms and subjective experiences, and could be considered inaccurate for research purposes. While parent report would still be sought clinically where an adolescent refuses to provide information, our findings suggest that parent reporting of adolescent suicidality should be interpreted with caution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4101965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41019652014-08-06 Depression and suicidal behavior in adolescents: a multi-informant and multi-methods approach to diagnostic classification Lewis, Andrew J. Bertino, Melanie D. Bailey, Catherine M. Skewes, Joanna Lubman, Dan I. Toumbourou, John W. Front Psychol Psychology Background: Informant discrepancies have been reported between parent and adolescent measures of depressive disorders and suicidality. We aimed to examine the concordance between adolescent and parent ratings of depressive disorder using both clinical interview and questionnaire measures and assess multi-informant and multi-method approaches to classification. Method: Within the context of assessment of eligibility for a randomized clinical trial, 50 parent–adolescent pairs (mean age of adolescents = 15.0 years) were interviewed separately with a structured diagnostic interview for depression, the KID-SCID. Adolescent self-report and parent-report versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire and the Depressive Experiences Questionnaire were also administered. We examined the diagnostic concordance rates of the parent vs. adolescent structured interview methods and the prediction of adolescent diagnosis via questionnaire methods. Results: Parent proxy reporting of adolescent depression and suicidal thoughts and behavior is not strongly concordant with adolescent report. Adolescent self-reported symptoms on depression scales provide a more accurate report of diagnosable adolescent depression than parent proxy reports of adolescent depressive symptoms. Adolescent self-report measures can be combined to improve the accuracy of classification. Parents tend to over report their adolescent’s depressive symptoms while under reporting their suicidal thoughts and behavior. Conclusion: Parent proxy report is clearly less reliable than the adolescent’s own report of their symptoms and subjective experiences, and could be considered inaccurate for research purposes. While parent report would still be sought clinically where an adolescent refuses to provide information, our findings suggest that parent reporting of adolescent suicidality should be interpreted with caution. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4101965/ /pubmed/25101031 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00766 Text en Copyright © 2014 Lewis, Bertino, Bailey, Skewes, Lubman and Toumbourou. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Lewis, Andrew J.
Bertino, Melanie D.
Bailey, Catherine M.
Skewes, Joanna
Lubman, Dan I.
Toumbourou, John W.
Depression and suicidal behavior in adolescents: a multi-informant and multi-methods approach to diagnostic classification
title Depression and suicidal behavior in adolescents: a multi-informant and multi-methods approach to diagnostic classification
title_full Depression and suicidal behavior in adolescents: a multi-informant and multi-methods approach to diagnostic classification
title_fullStr Depression and suicidal behavior in adolescents: a multi-informant and multi-methods approach to diagnostic classification
title_full_unstemmed Depression and suicidal behavior in adolescents: a multi-informant and multi-methods approach to diagnostic classification
title_short Depression and suicidal behavior in adolescents: a multi-informant and multi-methods approach to diagnostic classification
title_sort depression and suicidal behavior in adolescents: a multi-informant and multi-methods approach to diagnostic classification
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4101965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25101031
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00766
work_keys_str_mv AT lewisandrewj depressionandsuicidalbehaviorinadolescentsamultiinformantandmultimethodsapproachtodiagnosticclassification
AT bertinomelanied depressionandsuicidalbehaviorinadolescentsamultiinformantandmultimethodsapproachtodiagnosticclassification
AT baileycatherinem depressionandsuicidalbehaviorinadolescentsamultiinformantandmultimethodsapproachtodiagnosticclassification
AT skewesjoanna depressionandsuicidalbehaviorinadolescentsamultiinformantandmultimethodsapproachtodiagnosticclassification
AT lubmandani depressionandsuicidalbehaviorinadolescentsamultiinformantandmultimethodsapproachtodiagnosticclassification
AT toumbouroujohnw depressionandsuicidalbehaviorinadolescentsamultiinformantandmultimethodsapproachtodiagnosticclassification