Cargando…

Evaluating the impact of an integrated multidisciplinary head & neck competency-based anatomy & radiology teaching approach in radiation oncology: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Modern radiation oncology demands a thorough understanding of gross and cross-sectional anatomy for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Complex anatomic sites present challenges for learners and are not well-addressed in traditional postgraduate curricula. A multidisciplinary team (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Souza, Leah, Jaswal, Jasbir, Chan, Francis, Johnson, Marjorie, Tay, Keng Yeow, Fung, Kevin, Palma, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24969509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-124
_version_ 1782480997884887040
author D’Souza, Leah
Jaswal, Jasbir
Chan, Francis
Johnson, Marjorie
Tay, Keng Yeow
Fung, Kevin
Palma, David
author_facet D’Souza, Leah
Jaswal, Jasbir
Chan, Francis
Johnson, Marjorie
Tay, Keng Yeow
Fung, Kevin
Palma, David
author_sort D’Souza, Leah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Modern radiation oncology demands a thorough understanding of gross and cross-sectional anatomy for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Complex anatomic sites present challenges for learners and are not well-addressed in traditional postgraduate curricula. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) based head-and-neck gross and radiologic anatomy program for radiation oncology trainees was developed, piloted, and empirically assessed for efficacy and learning outcomes. METHODS: Four site-specific MDT head-and-neck seminars were implemented, each involving a MDT delivering didactic and case-based instruction, supplemented by cadaveric presentations. There was no dedicated contouring instruction. Pre- and post-testing were performed to assess knowledge, and ability to apply knowledge to the clinical setting as defined by accuracy of contouring. Paired analyses of knowledge pretests and posttests were performed by Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test. RESULTS: Fifteen post-graduate trainees participated. A statistically significant (p < 0.001) mean absolute improvement of 4.6 points (17.03%) was observed between knowledge pretest and posttest scores. Contouring accuracy was analyzed quantitatively by comparing spatial overlap of participants’ pretest and posttest contours with a gold standard through the dice similarity coefficient. A statistically significant improvement in contouring accuracy was observed for 3 out of 20 anatomical structures. Qualitative and quantitative feedback revealed that participants were more confident at contouring and were enthusiastic towards the seminars. CONCLUSIONS: MDT seminars were associated with improved knowledge scores and resident satisfaction; however, increased gross and cross-sectional anatomic knowledge did not translate into improvements in contouring accuracy. Further research should evaluate the impact of hands-on contouring sessions in addition to dedicated instructional sessions to develop competencies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4102036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41020362014-07-18 Evaluating the impact of an integrated multidisciplinary head & neck competency-based anatomy & radiology teaching approach in radiation oncology: a prospective cohort study D’Souza, Leah Jaswal, Jasbir Chan, Francis Johnson, Marjorie Tay, Keng Yeow Fung, Kevin Palma, David BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: Modern radiation oncology demands a thorough understanding of gross and cross-sectional anatomy for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Complex anatomic sites present challenges for learners and are not well-addressed in traditional postgraduate curricula. A multidisciplinary team (MDT) based head-and-neck gross and radiologic anatomy program for radiation oncology trainees was developed, piloted, and empirically assessed for efficacy and learning outcomes. METHODS: Four site-specific MDT head-and-neck seminars were implemented, each involving a MDT delivering didactic and case-based instruction, supplemented by cadaveric presentations. There was no dedicated contouring instruction. Pre- and post-testing were performed to assess knowledge, and ability to apply knowledge to the clinical setting as defined by accuracy of contouring. Paired analyses of knowledge pretests and posttests were performed by Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test. RESULTS: Fifteen post-graduate trainees participated. A statistically significant (p < 0.001) mean absolute improvement of 4.6 points (17.03%) was observed between knowledge pretest and posttest scores. Contouring accuracy was analyzed quantitatively by comparing spatial overlap of participants’ pretest and posttest contours with a gold standard through the dice similarity coefficient. A statistically significant improvement in contouring accuracy was observed for 3 out of 20 anatomical structures. Qualitative and quantitative feedback revealed that participants were more confident at contouring and were enthusiastic towards the seminars. CONCLUSIONS: MDT seminars were associated with improved knowledge scores and resident satisfaction; however, increased gross and cross-sectional anatomic knowledge did not translate into improvements in contouring accuracy. Further research should evaluate the impact of hands-on contouring sessions in addition to dedicated instructional sessions to develop competencies. BioMed Central 2014-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4102036/ /pubmed/24969509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-124 Text en Copyright © 2014 D’Souza et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
D’Souza, Leah
Jaswal, Jasbir
Chan, Francis
Johnson, Marjorie
Tay, Keng Yeow
Fung, Kevin
Palma, David
Evaluating the impact of an integrated multidisciplinary head & neck competency-based anatomy & radiology teaching approach in radiation oncology: a prospective cohort study
title Evaluating the impact of an integrated multidisciplinary head & neck competency-based anatomy & radiology teaching approach in radiation oncology: a prospective cohort study
title_full Evaluating the impact of an integrated multidisciplinary head & neck competency-based anatomy & radiology teaching approach in radiation oncology: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Evaluating the impact of an integrated multidisciplinary head & neck competency-based anatomy & radiology teaching approach in radiation oncology: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the impact of an integrated multidisciplinary head & neck competency-based anatomy & radiology teaching approach in radiation oncology: a prospective cohort study
title_short Evaluating the impact of an integrated multidisciplinary head & neck competency-based anatomy & radiology teaching approach in radiation oncology: a prospective cohort study
title_sort evaluating the impact of an integrated multidisciplinary head & neck competency-based anatomy & radiology teaching approach in radiation oncology: a prospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24969509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-124
work_keys_str_mv AT dsouzaleah evaluatingtheimpactofanintegratedmultidisciplinaryheadneckcompetencybasedanatomyradiologyteachingapproachinradiationoncologyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT jaswaljasbir evaluatingtheimpactofanintegratedmultidisciplinaryheadneckcompetencybasedanatomyradiologyteachingapproachinradiationoncologyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT chanfrancis evaluatingtheimpactofanintegratedmultidisciplinaryheadneckcompetencybasedanatomyradiologyteachingapproachinradiationoncologyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT johnsonmarjorie evaluatingtheimpactofanintegratedmultidisciplinaryheadneckcompetencybasedanatomyradiologyteachingapproachinradiationoncologyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT taykengyeow evaluatingtheimpactofanintegratedmultidisciplinaryheadneckcompetencybasedanatomyradiologyteachingapproachinradiationoncologyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT fungkevin evaluatingtheimpactofanintegratedmultidisciplinaryheadneckcompetencybasedanatomyradiologyteachingapproachinradiationoncologyaprospectivecohortstudy
AT palmadavid evaluatingtheimpactofanintegratedmultidisciplinaryheadneckcompetencybasedanatomyradiologyteachingapproachinradiationoncologyaprospectivecohortstudy