Cargando…

A New Model for Providing Cell-Free DNA and Risk Assessment for Chromosome Abnormalities in a Public Hospital Setting

Objective. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers highly accurate noninvasive screening for Down syndrome. Incorporating it into routine care is complicated. We present our experience implementing a novel program for cfDNA screening, emphasizing patient education, genetic counseling, and resource management....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallerstein, Robert, Jelks, Andrea, Garabedian, Matthew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25101177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/962720
_version_ 1782481010036834304
author Wallerstein, Robert
Jelks, Andrea
Garabedian, Matthew J.
author_facet Wallerstein, Robert
Jelks, Andrea
Garabedian, Matthew J.
author_sort Wallerstein, Robert
collection PubMed
description Objective. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers highly accurate noninvasive screening for Down syndrome. Incorporating it into routine care is complicated. We present our experience implementing a novel program for cfDNA screening, emphasizing patient education, genetic counseling, and resource management. Study Design. Beginning in January 2013, we initiated a new patient care model in which high-risk patients for aneuploidy received genetic counseling at 12 weeks of gestation. Patients were presented with four pathways for aneuploidy risk assessment and diagnosis: (1) cfDNA; (2) integrated screening; (3) direct-to-invasive testing (chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis); or (4) no first trimester diagnostic testing/screening. Patients underwent follow-up genetic counseling and detailed ultrasound at 18–20 weeks to review first trimester testing and finalize decision for amniocentesis. Results. Counseling and second trimester detailed ultrasound were provided to 163 women. Most selected cfDNA screening (69%) over integrated screening (0.6%), direct-to-invasive testing (14.1%), or no screening (16.6%). Amniocentesis rates decreased following implementation of cfDNA screening (19.0% versus 13.0%, P < 0.05). Conclusion. When counseled about screening options, women often chose cfDNA over integrated screening. This program is a model for patient-directed, efficient delivery of a newly available high-level technology in a public health setting. Genetic counseling is an integral part of patient education and determination of plan of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4102090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41020902014-08-06 A New Model for Providing Cell-Free DNA and Risk Assessment for Chromosome Abnormalities in a Public Hospital Setting Wallerstein, Robert Jelks, Andrea Garabedian, Matthew J. J Pregnancy Research Article Objective. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers highly accurate noninvasive screening for Down syndrome. Incorporating it into routine care is complicated. We present our experience implementing a novel program for cfDNA screening, emphasizing patient education, genetic counseling, and resource management. Study Design. Beginning in January 2013, we initiated a new patient care model in which high-risk patients for aneuploidy received genetic counseling at 12 weeks of gestation. Patients were presented with four pathways for aneuploidy risk assessment and diagnosis: (1) cfDNA; (2) integrated screening; (3) direct-to-invasive testing (chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis); or (4) no first trimester diagnostic testing/screening. Patients underwent follow-up genetic counseling and detailed ultrasound at 18–20 weeks to review first trimester testing and finalize decision for amniocentesis. Results. Counseling and second trimester detailed ultrasound were provided to 163 women. Most selected cfDNA screening (69%) over integrated screening (0.6%), direct-to-invasive testing (14.1%), or no screening (16.6%). Amniocentesis rates decreased following implementation of cfDNA screening (19.0% versus 13.0%, P < 0.05). Conclusion. When counseled about screening options, women often chose cfDNA over integrated screening. This program is a model for patient-directed, efficient delivery of a newly available high-level technology in a public health setting. Genetic counseling is an integral part of patient education and determination of plan of care. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4102090/ /pubmed/25101177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/962720 Text en Copyright © 2014 Robert Wallerstein et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wallerstein, Robert
Jelks, Andrea
Garabedian, Matthew J.
A New Model for Providing Cell-Free DNA and Risk Assessment for Chromosome Abnormalities in a Public Hospital Setting
title A New Model for Providing Cell-Free DNA and Risk Assessment for Chromosome Abnormalities in a Public Hospital Setting
title_full A New Model for Providing Cell-Free DNA and Risk Assessment for Chromosome Abnormalities in a Public Hospital Setting
title_fullStr A New Model for Providing Cell-Free DNA and Risk Assessment for Chromosome Abnormalities in a Public Hospital Setting
title_full_unstemmed A New Model for Providing Cell-Free DNA and Risk Assessment for Chromosome Abnormalities in a Public Hospital Setting
title_short A New Model for Providing Cell-Free DNA and Risk Assessment for Chromosome Abnormalities in a Public Hospital Setting
title_sort new model for providing cell-free dna and risk assessment for chromosome abnormalities in a public hospital setting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25101177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/962720
work_keys_str_mv AT wallersteinrobert anewmodelforprovidingcellfreednaandriskassessmentforchromosomeabnormalitiesinapublichospitalsetting
AT jelksandrea anewmodelforprovidingcellfreednaandriskassessmentforchromosomeabnormalitiesinapublichospitalsetting
AT garabedianmatthewj anewmodelforprovidingcellfreednaandriskassessmentforchromosomeabnormalitiesinapublichospitalsetting
AT wallersteinrobert newmodelforprovidingcellfreednaandriskassessmentforchromosomeabnormalitiesinapublichospitalsetting
AT jelksandrea newmodelforprovidingcellfreednaandriskassessmentforchromosomeabnormalitiesinapublichospitalsetting
AT garabedianmatthewj newmodelforprovidingcellfreednaandriskassessmentforchromosomeabnormalitiesinapublichospitalsetting