Cargando…

Suitable Habitats for Endangered Frugivorous Mammals: Small-Scale Comparison, Regeneration Forest and Chimpanzee Density in Kibale National Park, Uganda

Landscape patterns and chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) densities in Kibale National Park show important variation among communities that are geographically close to one another (from 1.5 to 5.1 chimpanzees/km(2)). Anthropogenic activities inside the park (past logging activities, current...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bortolamiol, Sarah, Cohen, Marianne, Potts, Kevin, Pennec, Flora, Rwaburindore, Protase, Kasenene, John, Seguya, Andrew, Vignaud, Quentin, Krief, Sabrina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25033459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102177
_version_ 1782481051457683456
author Bortolamiol, Sarah
Cohen, Marianne
Potts, Kevin
Pennec, Flora
Rwaburindore, Protase
Kasenene, John
Seguya, Andrew
Vignaud, Quentin
Krief, Sabrina
author_facet Bortolamiol, Sarah
Cohen, Marianne
Potts, Kevin
Pennec, Flora
Rwaburindore, Protase
Kasenene, John
Seguya, Andrew
Vignaud, Quentin
Krief, Sabrina
author_sort Bortolamiol, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Landscape patterns and chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) densities in Kibale National Park show important variation among communities that are geographically close to one another (from 1.5 to 5.1 chimpanzees/km(2)). Anthropogenic activities inside the park (past logging activities, current encroachment) and outside its limits (food and cash crops) may impact the amount and distribution of food resources for chimpanzees (frugivorous species) and their spatial distribution within the park. Spatial and temporal patterns of fruit availability were recorded over 18 months at Sebitoli (a site of intermediate chimpanzee density and higher anthropic pressure) with the aim of understanding the factors explaining chimpanzee density there, in comparison to results from two other sites, also in Kibale: Kanyawara (low chimpanzee density) and Ngogo (high density, and furthest from Sebitoli). Because of the post-logging regenerating status of the forest in Sebitoli and Kanyawara, smaller basal area (BA) of fruiting trees most widely consumed by the chimpanzees in Kanyawara and Sebitoli was expected compared to Ngogo (not logged commercially). Due to the distance between sites, spatial and temporal fruit abundance in Sebitoli was expected to be more similar to Kanyawara than to Ngogo. While species functional classes consumed by Sebitoli chimpanzees (foods eaten during periods of high or low fruit abundance) differ from the two other sites, Sebitoli is very similar to Kanyawara in terms of land-cover and consumed species. Among feeding trees, Ficus species are particularly important resources for chimpanzees at Sebitoli, where their basal area is higher than at Kanywara or Ngogo. Ficus species provided a relatively consistent supply of food for chimpanzees throughout the year, and we suggest that this could help to explain the unusually high density of chimpanzees in such a disturbed site.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4102508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41025082014-07-21 Suitable Habitats for Endangered Frugivorous Mammals: Small-Scale Comparison, Regeneration Forest and Chimpanzee Density in Kibale National Park, Uganda Bortolamiol, Sarah Cohen, Marianne Potts, Kevin Pennec, Flora Rwaburindore, Protase Kasenene, John Seguya, Andrew Vignaud, Quentin Krief, Sabrina PLoS One Research Article Landscape patterns and chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) densities in Kibale National Park show important variation among communities that are geographically close to one another (from 1.5 to 5.1 chimpanzees/km(2)). Anthropogenic activities inside the park (past logging activities, current encroachment) and outside its limits (food and cash crops) may impact the amount and distribution of food resources for chimpanzees (frugivorous species) and their spatial distribution within the park. Spatial and temporal patterns of fruit availability were recorded over 18 months at Sebitoli (a site of intermediate chimpanzee density and higher anthropic pressure) with the aim of understanding the factors explaining chimpanzee density there, in comparison to results from two other sites, also in Kibale: Kanyawara (low chimpanzee density) and Ngogo (high density, and furthest from Sebitoli). Because of the post-logging regenerating status of the forest in Sebitoli and Kanyawara, smaller basal area (BA) of fruiting trees most widely consumed by the chimpanzees in Kanyawara and Sebitoli was expected compared to Ngogo (not logged commercially). Due to the distance between sites, spatial and temporal fruit abundance in Sebitoli was expected to be more similar to Kanyawara than to Ngogo. While species functional classes consumed by Sebitoli chimpanzees (foods eaten during periods of high or low fruit abundance) differ from the two other sites, Sebitoli is very similar to Kanyawara in terms of land-cover and consumed species. Among feeding trees, Ficus species are particularly important resources for chimpanzees at Sebitoli, where their basal area is higher than at Kanywara or Ngogo. Ficus species provided a relatively consistent supply of food for chimpanzees throughout the year, and we suggest that this could help to explain the unusually high density of chimpanzees in such a disturbed site. Public Library of Science 2014-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4102508/ /pubmed/25033459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102177 Text en © 2014 Bortolamiol et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bortolamiol, Sarah
Cohen, Marianne
Potts, Kevin
Pennec, Flora
Rwaburindore, Protase
Kasenene, John
Seguya, Andrew
Vignaud, Quentin
Krief, Sabrina
Suitable Habitats for Endangered Frugivorous Mammals: Small-Scale Comparison, Regeneration Forest and Chimpanzee Density in Kibale National Park, Uganda
title Suitable Habitats for Endangered Frugivorous Mammals: Small-Scale Comparison, Regeneration Forest and Chimpanzee Density in Kibale National Park, Uganda
title_full Suitable Habitats for Endangered Frugivorous Mammals: Small-Scale Comparison, Regeneration Forest and Chimpanzee Density in Kibale National Park, Uganda
title_fullStr Suitable Habitats for Endangered Frugivorous Mammals: Small-Scale Comparison, Regeneration Forest and Chimpanzee Density in Kibale National Park, Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Suitable Habitats for Endangered Frugivorous Mammals: Small-Scale Comparison, Regeneration Forest and Chimpanzee Density in Kibale National Park, Uganda
title_short Suitable Habitats for Endangered Frugivorous Mammals: Small-Scale Comparison, Regeneration Forest and Chimpanzee Density in Kibale National Park, Uganda
title_sort suitable habitats for endangered frugivorous mammals: small-scale comparison, regeneration forest and chimpanzee density in kibale national park, uganda
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25033459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102177
work_keys_str_mv AT bortolamiolsarah suitablehabitatsforendangeredfrugivorousmammalssmallscalecomparisonregenerationforestandchimpanzeedensityinkibalenationalparkuganda
AT cohenmarianne suitablehabitatsforendangeredfrugivorousmammalssmallscalecomparisonregenerationforestandchimpanzeedensityinkibalenationalparkuganda
AT pottskevin suitablehabitatsforendangeredfrugivorousmammalssmallscalecomparisonregenerationforestandchimpanzeedensityinkibalenationalparkuganda
AT pennecflora suitablehabitatsforendangeredfrugivorousmammalssmallscalecomparisonregenerationforestandchimpanzeedensityinkibalenationalparkuganda
AT rwaburindoreprotase suitablehabitatsforendangeredfrugivorousmammalssmallscalecomparisonregenerationforestandchimpanzeedensityinkibalenationalparkuganda
AT kasenenejohn suitablehabitatsforendangeredfrugivorousmammalssmallscalecomparisonregenerationforestandchimpanzeedensityinkibalenationalparkuganda
AT seguyaandrew suitablehabitatsforendangeredfrugivorousmammalssmallscalecomparisonregenerationforestandchimpanzeedensityinkibalenationalparkuganda
AT vignaudquentin suitablehabitatsforendangeredfrugivorousmammalssmallscalecomparisonregenerationforestandchimpanzeedensityinkibalenationalparkuganda
AT kriefsabrina suitablehabitatsforendangeredfrugivorousmammalssmallscalecomparisonregenerationforestandchimpanzeedensityinkibalenationalparkuganda