Cargando…

Blended Working: For Whom It May (Not) Work

Similarly to related developments such as blended learning and blended care, blended working is a pervasive and booming trend in modern societies. Blended working combines on-site and off-site working in an optimal way to improve workers’ and organizations’ outcomes. In this paper, we examine the de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Yperen, Nico W., Rietzschel, Eric F., De Jonge, Kiki M. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25033202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102921
_version_ 1782327038642749440
author Van Yperen, Nico W.
Rietzschel, Eric F.
De Jonge, Kiki M. M.
author_facet Van Yperen, Nico W.
Rietzschel, Eric F.
De Jonge, Kiki M. M.
author_sort Van Yperen, Nico W.
collection PubMed
description Similarly to related developments such as blended learning and blended care, blended working is a pervasive and booming trend in modern societies. Blended working combines on-site and off-site working in an optimal way to improve workers’ and organizations’ outcomes. In this paper, we examine the degree to which workers feel that the two defining features of blended working (i.e., time-independent working and location-independent working) enhance their own functioning in their jobs. Blended working, enabled through the continuing advance and improvement of high-tech ICT software, devices, and infrastructure, may be considered beneficial for workers’ perceived effectiveness because it increases their job autonomy. However, because blended working may have downsides as well, it is important to know for whom blended working may (not) work. As hypothesized, in a sample of 348 workers (51.7% women), representing a wide range of occupations and organizations, we found that the perceived personal effectiveness of blended working was contingent upon workers’ psychological need strength. Specifically, the perceived effectiveness of both time-independent working and location-independent working was positively related to individuals’ need for autonomy at work, and negatively related to their need for relatedness and need for structure at work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4102582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41025822014-07-21 Blended Working: For Whom It May (Not) Work Van Yperen, Nico W. Rietzschel, Eric F. De Jonge, Kiki M. M. PLoS One Research Article Similarly to related developments such as blended learning and blended care, blended working is a pervasive and booming trend in modern societies. Blended working combines on-site and off-site working in an optimal way to improve workers’ and organizations’ outcomes. In this paper, we examine the degree to which workers feel that the two defining features of blended working (i.e., time-independent working and location-independent working) enhance their own functioning in their jobs. Blended working, enabled through the continuing advance and improvement of high-tech ICT software, devices, and infrastructure, may be considered beneficial for workers’ perceived effectiveness because it increases their job autonomy. However, because blended working may have downsides as well, it is important to know for whom blended working may (not) work. As hypothesized, in a sample of 348 workers (51.7% women), representing a wide range of occupations and organizations, we found that the perceived personal effectiveness of blended working was contingent upon workers’ psychological need strength. Specifically, the perceived effectiveness of both time-independent working and location-independent working was positively related to individuals’ need for autonomy at work, and negatively related to their need for relatedness and need for structure at work. Public Library of Science 2014-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4102582/ /pubmed/25033202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102921 Text en © 2014 Van Yperen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Van Yperen, Nico W.
Rietzschel, Eric F.
De Jonge, Kiki M. M.
Blended Working: For Whom It May (Not) Work
title Blended Working: For Whom It May (Not) Work
title_full Blended Working: For Whom It May (Not) Work
title_fullStr Blended Working: For Whom It May (Not) Work
title_full_unstemmed Blended Working: For Whom It May (Not) Work
title_short Blended Working: For Whom It May (Not) Work
title_sort blended working: for whom it may (not) work
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25033202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102921
work_keys_str_mv AT vanyperennicow blendedworkingforwhomitmaynotwork
AT rietzschelericf blendedworkingforwhomitmaynotwork
AT dejongekikimm blendedworkingforwhomitmaynotwork