Cargando…

Comparing a non-invasive hemodynamic monitor with minimally invasive monitoring during major open abdominal surgery

As part of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, the goal-directed fluid management with hemodynamic monitoring can effectively guide perioperative fluid use and significantly improve the outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing major surgeries. Several minimally invasive and non-inv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ong, Lawrence, Liu, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial Department of Journal of Biomedical Research 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25050116
http://dx.doi.org/10.7555/JBR.28.20140005
_version_ 1782327077547016192
author Ong, Lawrence
Liu, Hong
author_facet Ong, Lawrence
Liu, Hong
author_sort Ong, Lawrence
collection PubMed
description As part of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, the goal-directed fluid management with hemodynamic monitoring can effectively guide perioperative fluid use and significantly improve the outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing major surgeries. Several minimally invasive and non-invasive monitoring devices are commercially available for clinical use. As part of an internal evaluation, we reported the results from three different hemodynamic monitoring devices used in a patient undergoing a major abdominal surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4102846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Editorial Department of Journal of Biomedical Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41028462014-07-21 Comparing a non-invasive hemodynamic monitor with minimally invasive monitoring during major open abdominal surgery Ong, Lawrence Liu, Hong J Biomed Res Case Report As part of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, the goal-directed fluid management with hemodynamic monitoring can effectively guide perioperative fluid use and significantly improve the outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing major surgeries. Several minimally invasive and non-invasive monitoring devices are commercially available for clinical use. As part of an internal evaluation, we reported the results from three different hemodynamic monitoring devices used in a patient undergoing a major abdominal surgery. Editorial Department of Journal of Biomedical Research 2014-07 2014-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4102846/ /pubmed/25050116 http://dx.doi.org/10.7555/JBR.28.20140005 Text en 2014 the Journal of Biomedical Research. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Case Report
Ong, Lawrence
Liu, Hong
Comparing a non-invasive hemodynamic monitor with minimally invasive monitoring during major open abdominal surgery
title Comparing a non-invasive hemodynamic monitor with minimally invasive monitoring during major open abdominal surgery
title_full Comparing a non-invasive hemodynamic monitor with minimally invasive monitoring during major open abdominal surgery
title_fullStr Comparing a non-invasive hemodynamic monitor with minimally invasive monitoring during major open abdominal surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparing a non-invasive hemodynamic monitor with minimally invasive monitoring during major open abdominal surgery
title_short Comparing a non-invasive hemodynamic monitor with minimally invasive monitoring during major open abdominal surgery
title_sort comparing a non-invasive hemodynamic monitor with minimally invasive monitoring during major open abdominal surgery
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25050116
http://dx.doi.org/10.7555/JBR.28.20140005
work_keys_str_mv AT onglawrence comparinganoninvasivehemodynamicmonitorwithminimallyinvasivemonitoringduringmajoropenabdominalsurgery
AT liuhong comparinganoninvasivehemodynamicmonitorwithminimallyinvasivemonitoringduringmajoropenabdominalsurgery