Cargando…
Prognostic significance of CD44 variant 2 upregulation in colorectal cancer
BACKGROUND: CD133 and CD44 are putative cancer stem cell (CSC) markers in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, their clinical significance is currently unclear. Here, we evaluated primary CRC cell isolates to determine the significance of several CSC markers, including CD133 and CD44, as predictors of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24921913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.253 |
_version_ | 1782327091925090304 |
---|---|
author | Ozawa, M Ichikawa, Y Zheng, Y-W Oshima, T Miyata, H Nakazawa, K Guan, H-B Shiozawa, M Akaike, M Watanabe, K Ota, M Fujii, S Kunisaki, C Ishikawa, T Tanaka, K Akiyama, H Endo, I Taniguchi, H |
author_facet | Ozawa, M Ichikawa, Y Zheng, Y-W Oshima, T Miyata, H Nakazawa, K Guan, H-B Shiozawa, M Akaike, M Watanabe, K Ota, M Fujii, S Kunisaki, C Ishikawa, T Tanaka, K Akiyama, H Endo, I Taniguchi, H |
author_sort | Ozawa, M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: CD133 and CD44 are putative cancer stem cell (CSC) markers in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, their clinical significance is currently unclear. Here, we evaluated primary CRC cell isolates to determine the significance of several CSC markers, including CD133 and CD44, as predictors of tumourigenesis and prognosis. METHODS: CD133- and CD44-positive cells from fresh clinical samples of 77 CRCs were selected by flow cytometric sorting and evaluated for tumourigenicity following subcutaneous transplantation into NOD/SCID mice. Cancer stem cell marker expression was examined in both xenografts and a complementary DNA library compiled from 167 CRC patient samples. RESULTS: CD44(+), CD133(+) and CD133(+)CD44(+) sub-populations were significantly more tumourigenic than the total cell population. The clinical samples expressed several transcript variants of CD44. Variant 2 was specifically overexpressed in both primary tumours and xenografts in comparison with the normal mucosa. A prognostic assay using qRT–PCR showed that the CD44v2(high) group (n=84, 5-year survival rate (5-OS): 0.74) had a significantly worse prognosis (P=0.041) than the CD44v2(low) group (n=83, 5-OS: 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: CD44 is an important CSC marker in CRC patients. Furthermore, CRC patients with high expression of CD44v2 have a poorer prognosis than patients with other CD44 variants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4102936 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41029362015-07-15 Prognostic significance of CD44 variant 2 upregulation in colorectal cancer Ozawa, M Ichikawa, Y Zheng, Y-W Oshima, T Miyata, H Nakazawa, K Guan, H-B Shiozawa, M Akaike, M Watanabe, K Ota, M Fujii, S Kunisaki, C Ishikawa, T Tanaka, K Akiyama, H Endo, I Taniguchi, H Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics BACKGROUND: CD133 and CD44 are putative cancer stem cell (CSC) markers in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, their clinical significance is currently unclear. Here, we evaluated primary CRC cell isolates to determine the significance of several CSC markers, including CD133 and CD44, as predictors of tumourigenesis and prognosis. METHODS: CD133- and CD44-positive cells from fresh clinical samples of 77 CRCs were selected by flow cytometric sorting and evaluated for tumourigenicity following subcutaneous transplantation into NOD/SCID mice. Cancer stem cell marker expression was examined in both xenografts and a complementary DNA library compiled from 167 CRC patient samples. RESULTS: CD44(+), CD133(+) and CD133(+)CD44(+) sub-populations were significantly more tumourigenic than the total cell population. The clinical samples expressed several transcript variants of CD44. Variant 2 was specifically overexpressed in both primary tumours and xenografts in comparison with the normal mucosa. A prognostic assay using qRT–PCR showed that the CD44v2(high) group (n=84, 5-year survival rate (5-OS): 0.74) had a significantly worse prognosis (P=0.041) than the CD44v2(low) group (n=83, 5-OS: 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: CD44 is an important CSC marker in CRC patients. Furthermore, CRC patients with high expression of CD44v2 have a poorer prognosis than patients with other CD44 variants. Nature Publishing Group 2014-07-15 2014-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4102936/ /pubmed/24921913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.253 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Molecular Diagnostics Ozawa, M Ichikawa, Y Zheng, Y-W Oshima, T Miyata, H Nakazawa, K Guan, H-B Shiozawa, M Akaike, M Watanabe, K Ota, M Fujii, S Kunisaki, C Ishikawa, T Tanaka, K Akiyama, H Endo, I Taniguchi, H Prognostic significance of CD44 variant 2 upregulation in colorectal cancer |
title | Prognostic significance of CD44 variant 2 upregulation in colorectal cancer |
title_full | Prognostic significance of CD44 variant 2 upregulation in colorectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Prognostic significance of CD44 variant 2 upregulation in colorectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic significance of CD44 variant 2 upregulation in colorectal cancer |
title_short | Prognostic significance of CD44 variant 2 upregulation in colorectal cancer |
title_sort | prognostic significance of cd44 variant 2 upregulation in colorectal cancer |
topic | Molecular Diagnostics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24921913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.253 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ozawam prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer AT ichikaway prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer AT zhengyw prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer AT oshimat prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer AT miyatah prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer AT nakazawak prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer AT guanhb prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer AT shiozawam prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer AT akaikem prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer AT watanabek prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer AT otam prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer AT fujiis prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer AT kunisakic prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer AT ishikawat prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer AT tanakak prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer AT akiyamah prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer AT endoi prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer AT taniguchih prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer |