Cargando…

Prognostic significance of CD44 variant 2 upregulation in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: CD133 and CD44 are putative cancer stem cell (CSC) markers in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, their clinical significance is currently unclear. Here, we evaluated primary CRC cell isolates to determine the significance of several CSC markers, including CD133 and CD44, as predictors of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozawa, M, Ichikawa, Y, Zheng, Y-W, Oshima, T, Miyata, H, Nakazawa, K, Guan, H-B, Shiozawa, M, Akaike, M, Watanabe, K, Ota, M, Fujii, S, Kunisaki, C, Ishikawa, T, Tanaka, K, Akiyama, H, Endo, I, Taniguchi, H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24921913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.253
_version_ 1782327091925090304
author Ozawa, M
Ichikawa, Y
Zheng, Y-W
Oshima, T
Miyata, H
Nakazawa, K
Guan, H-B
Shiozawa, M
Akaike, M
Watanabe, K
Ota, M
Fujii, S
Kunisaki, C
Ishikawa, T
Tanaka, K
Akiyama, H
Endo, I
Taniguchi, H
author_facet Ozawa, M
Ichikawa, Y
Zheng, Y-W
Oshima, T
Miyata, H
Nakazawa, K
Guan, H-B
Shiozawa, M
Akaike, M
Watanabe, K
Ota, M
Fujii, S
Kunisaki, C
Ishikawa, T
Tanaka, K
Akiyama, H
Endo, I
Taniguchi, H
author_sort Ozawa, M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: CD133 and CD44 are putative cancer stem cell (CSC) markers in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, their clinical significance is currently unclear. Here, we evaluated primary CRC cell isolates to determine the significance of several CSC markers, including CD133 and CD44, as predictors of tumourigenesis and prognosis. METHODS: CD133- and CD44-positive cells from fresh clinical samples of 77 CRCs were selected by flow cytometric sorting and evaluated for tumourigenicity following subcutaneous transplantation into NOD/SCID mice. Cancer stem cell marker expression was examined in both xenografts and a complementary DNA library compiled from 167 CRC patient samples. RESULTS: CD44(+), CD133(+) and CD133(+)CD44(+) sub-populations were significantly more tumourigenic than the total cell population. The clinical samples expressed several transcript variants of CD44. Variant 2 was specifically overexpressed in both primary tumours and xenografts in comparison with the normal mucosa. A prognostic assay using qRT–PCR showed that the CD44v2(high) group (n=84, 5-year survival rate (5-OS): 0.74) had a significantly worse prognosis (P=0.041) than the CD44v2(low) group (n=83, 5-OS: 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: CD44 is an important CSC marker in CRC patients. Furthermore, CRC patients with high expression of CD44v2 have a poorer prognosis than patients with other CD44 variants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4102936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41029362015-07-15 Prognostic significance of CD44 variant 2 upregulation in colorectal cancer Ozawa, M Ichikawa, Y Zheng, Y-W Oshima, T Miyata, H Nakazawa, K Guan, H-B Shiozawa, M Akaike, M Watanabe, K Ota, M Fujii, S Kunisaki, C Ishikawa, T Tanaka, K Akiyama, H Endo, I Taniguchi, H Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics BACKGROUND: CD133 and CD44 are putative cancer stem cell (CSC) markers in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, their clinical significance is currently unclear. Here, we evaluated primary CRC cell isolates to determine the significance of several CSC markers, including CD133 and CD44, as predictors of tumourigenesis and prognosis. METHODS: CD133- and CD44-positive cells from fresh clinical samples of 77 CRCs were selected by flow cytometric sorting and evaluated for tumourigenicity following subcutaneous transplantation into NOD/SCID mice. Cancer stem cell marker expression was examined in both xenografts and a complementary DNA library compiled from 167 CRC patient samples. RESULTS: CD44(+), CD133(+) and CD133(+)CD44(+) sub-populations were significantly more tumourigenic than the total cell population. The clinical samples expressed several transcript variants of CD44. Variant 2 was specifically overexpressed in both primary tumours and xenografts in comparison with the normal mucosa. A prognostic assay using qRT–PCR showed that the CD44v2(high) group (n=84, 5-year survival rate (5-OS): 0.74) had a significantly worse prognosis (P=0.041) than the CD44v2(low) group (n=83, 5-OS: 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: CD44 is an important CSC marker in CRC patients. Furthermore, CRC patients with high expression of CD44v2 have a poorer prognosis than patients with other CD44 variants. Nature Publishing Group 2014-07-15 2014-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4102936/ /pubmed/24921913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.253 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Molecular Diagnostics
Ozawa, M
Ichikawa, Y
Zheng, Y-W
Oshima, T
Miyata, H
Nakazawa, K
Guan, H-B
Shiozawa, M
Akaike, M
Watanabe, K
Ota, M
Fujii, S
Kunisaki, C
Ishikawa, T
Tanaka, K
Akiyama, H
Endo, I
Taniguchi, H
Prognostic significance of CD44 variant 2 upregulation in colorectal cancer
title Prognostic significance of CD44 variant 2 upregulation in colorectal cancer
title_full Prognostic significance of CD44 variant 2 upregulation in colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Prognostic significance of CD44 variant 2 upregulation in colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic significance of CD44 variant 2 upregulation in colorectal cancer
title_short Prognostic significance of CD44 variant 2 upregulation in colorectal cancer
title_sort prognostic significance of cd44 variant 2 upregulation in colorectal cancer
topic Molecular Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24921913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.253
work_keys_str_mv AT ozawam prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer
AT ichikaway prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer
AT zhengyw prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer
AT oshimat prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer
AT miyatah prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer
AT nakazawak prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer
AT guanhb prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer
AT shiozawam prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer
AT akaikem prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer
AT watanabek prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer
AT otam prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer
AT fujiis prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer
AT kunisakic prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer
AT ishikawat prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer
AT tanakak prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer
AT akiyamah prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer
AT endoi prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer
AT taniguchih prognosticsignificanceofcd44variant2upregulationincolorectalcancer