Cargando…

Clinical nodal staging scores for prostate cancer: a proposal for preoperative risk assessment

BACKGROUND: Pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer is not without morbidity and its therapeutical benefit is still a matter of debate. The objective of this study was to develop a model that allows preoperative determination...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kluth, L A, Abdollah, F, Xylinas, E, Rieken, M, Fajkovic, H, Seitz, C, Sun, M, Karakiewicz, P I, Schramek, P, Herman, M P, Becker, A, Hansen, J, Ehdaie, B, Loidl, W, Pummer, K, Lee, R K, Lotan, Y, Scherr, D S, Seiler, D, Ahyai, S A, Chun, F K-H, Graefen, M, Tewari, A, Nonis, A, Bachmann, A, Montorsi, F, Gönen, M, Briganti, A, Shariat, S F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25003663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.311
_version_ 1782327094660825088
author Kluth, L A
Abdollah, F
Xylinas, E
Rieken, M
Fajkovic, H
Seitz, C
Sun, M
Karakiewicz, P I
Schramek, P
Herman, M P
Becker, A
Hansen, J
Ehdaie, B
Loidl, W
Pummer, K
Lee, R K
Lotan, Y
Scherr, D S
Seiler, D
Ahyai, S A
Chun, F K-H
Graefen, M
Tewari, A
Nonis, A
Bachmann, A
Montorsi, F
Gönen, M
Briganti, A
Shariat, S F
author_facet Kluth, L A
Abdollah, F
Xylinas, E
Rieken, M
Fajkovic, H
Seitz, C
Sun, M
Karakiewicz, P I
Schramek, P
Herman, M P
Becker, A
Hansen, J
Ehdaie, B
Loidl, W
Pummer, K
Lee, R K
Lotan, Y
Scherr, D S
Seiler, D
Ahyai, S A
Chun, F K-H
Graefen, M
Tewari, A
Nonis, A
Bachmann, A
Montorsi, F
Gönen, M
Briganti, A
Shariat, S F
author_sort Kluth, L A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer is not without morbidity and its therapeutical benefit is still a matter of debate. The objective of this study was to develop a model that allows preoperative determination of the minimum number of lymph nodes needed to be removed at radical prostatectomy to ensure true nodal status. METHODS: We analysed data from 4770 patients treated with radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection between 2000 and 2011 from eight academic centres. For external validation of our model, we used data from a cohort of 3595 patients who underwent an anatomically defined extended pelvic lymph node dissection. We estimated the sensitivity of pathological nodal staging using a beta-binomial model and developed a novel clinical (preoperative) nodal staging score (cNSS), which represents the probability that a patient has lymph node metastasis as a function of the number of examined nodes. RESULTS: In the development and validation cohorts, the probability of missing a positive lymph node decreases with increase in the number of nodes examined. A 90% cNSS can be achieved in the development and validation cohorts by examining 1–6 nodes in cT1 and 6–8 nodes in cT2 tumours. With 11 nodes examined, patients in the development and validation cohorts achieved a cNSS of 90% and 80% with cT3 tumours, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic lymph node dissection is the only reliable technique to ensure accurate nodal staging in patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer. The minimum number of examined lymph nodes needed for accurate nodal staging may be predictable, being strongly dependent on prostate cancer characteristics at diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4102948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41029482015-07-15 Clinical nodal staging scores for prostate cancer: a proposal for preoperative risk assessment Kluth, L A Abdollah, F Xylinas, E Rieken, M Fajkovic, H Seitz, C Sun, M Karakiewicz, P I Schramek, P Herman, M P Becker, A Hansen, J Ehdaie, B Loidl, W Pummer, K Lee, R K Lotan, Y Scherr, D S Seiler, D Ahyai, S A Chun, F K-H Graefen, M Tewari, A Nonis, A Bachmann, A Montorsi, F Gönen, M Briganti, A Shariat, S F Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer is not without morbidity and its therapeutical benefit is still a matter of debate. The objective of this study was to develop a model that allows preoperative determination of the minimum number of lymph nodes needed to be removed at radical prostatectomy to ensure true nodal status. METHODS: We analysed data from 4770 patients treated with radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection between 2000 and 2011 from eight academic centres. For external validation of our model, we used data from a cohort of 3595 patients who underwent an anatomically defined extended pelvic lymph node dissection. We estimated the sensitivity of pathological nodal staging using a beta-binomial model and developed a novel clinical (preoperative) nodal staging score (cNSS), which represents the probability that a patient has lymph node metastasis as a function of the number of examined nodes. RESULTS: In the development and validation cohorts, the probability of missing a positive lymph node decreases with increase in the number of nodes examined. A 90% cNSS can be achieved in the development and validation cohorts by examining 1–6 nodes in cT1 and 6–8 nodes in cT2 tumours. With 11 nodes examined, patients in the development and validation cohorts achieved a cNSS of 90% and 80% with cT3 tumours, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic lymph node dissection is the only reliable technique to ensure accurate nodal staging in patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localised prostate cancer. The minimum number of examined lymph nodes needed for accurate nodal staging may be predictable, being strongly dependent on prostate cancer characteristics at diagnosis. Nature Publishing Group 2014-07-15 2014-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4102948/ /pubmed/25003663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.311 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Kluth, L A
Abdollah, F
Xylinas, E
Rieken, M
Fajkovic, H
Seitz, C
Sun, M
Karakiewicz, P I
Schramek, P
Herman, M P
Becker, A
Hansen, J
Ehdaie, B
Loidl, W
Pummer, K
Lee, R K
Lotan, Y
Scherr, D S
Seiler, D
Ahyai, S A
Chun, F K-H
Graefen, M
Tewari, A
Nonis, A
Bachmann, A
Montorsi, F
Gönen, M
Briganti, A
Shariat, S F
Clinical nodal staging scores for prostate cancer: a proposal for preoperative risk assessment
title Clinical nodal staging scores for prostate cancer: a proposal for preoperative risk assessment
title_full Clinical nodal staging scores for prostate cancer: a proposal for preoperative risk assessment
title_fullStr Clinical nodal staging scores for prostate cancer: a proposal for preoperative risk assessment
title_full_unstemmed Clinical nodal staging scores for prostate cancer: a proposal for preoperative risk assessment
title_short Clinical nodal staging scores for prostate cancer: a proposal for preoperative risk assessment
title_sort clinical nodal staging scores for prostate cancer: a proposal for preoperative risk assessment
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4102948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25003663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.311
work_keys_str_mv AT kluthla clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT abdollahf clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT xylinase clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT riekenm clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT fajkovich clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT seitzc clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT sunm clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT karakiewiczpi clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT schramekp clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT hermanmp clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT beckera clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT hansenj clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT ehdaieb clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT loidlw clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT pummerk clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT leerk clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT lotany clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT scherrds clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT seilerd clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT ahyaisa clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT chunfkh clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT graefenm clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT tewaria clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT nonisa clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT bachmanna clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT montorsif clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT gonenm clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT brigantia clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment
AT shariatsf clinicalnodalstagingscoresforprostatecanceraproposalforpreoperativeriskassessment