Cargando…

A Cross-sectional Study of Direct Immunofluorescence in the Diagnosis of Immunobullous Dermatoses

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune blistering diseases are a group of bullous disorders characterized by pathogenic antibodies directed at the target antigens, which are components of the desmosomes or adhesion complex at the dermoepidermal junction. Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is invaluable in the diagnosi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buch, Archana C, Kumar, Harsh, Panicker, NK, Misal, Sonali, Sharma, YK, Gore, Charusheela R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4103273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25071256
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.135488
_version_ 1782327127086989312
author Buch, Archana C
Kumar, Harsh
Panicker, NK
Misal, Sonali
Sharma, YK
Gore, Charusheela R
author_facet Buch, Archana C
Kumar, Harsh
Panicker, NK
Misal, Sonali
Sharma, YK
Gore, Charusheela R
author_sort Buch, Archana C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Autoimmune blistering diseases are a group of bullous disorders characterized by pathogenic antibodies directed at the target antigens, which are components of the desmosomes or adhesion complex at the dermoepidermal junction. Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is invaluable in the diagnosis of these lesions. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of DIF in immunobullous dermatoses and to study the pattern of DIF. The study also aims to correlate DIF with clinical and histologic findings and to analyze discrepancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total 100 biopsies received over a period of 2 years in the Department of Pathology were analyzed. DIF, histopathology and clinical data were reviewed. RESULTS: Out of 100, 89 cases showed DIF patterns concordant with clinical/histologic diagnosis. The sensitivity of DIF was 94.44% (51/58) in the pemphigus and 84% (21/25) in the bullous pemphigoid (BP) group, 100% each in dermatitis herpetiformis (2/2) and linear IgA disease (1/1). A total of 11 histologically proven cases of immunobullous lesions were DIF negative-four (three of pemphigus vulgaris and one of BP) due to having no epidermis, three (cases of BP) owing to sampling/technical errors and the remaining four (cases of pemphigus vulgaris) due to being on treatment. CONCLUSION: Immunofluorescence helps confirm the diagnosis of bullous lesions in which there is clinical and the histopathologic overlap. Sampling errors contributed to false negative (FN) results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4103273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41032732014-07-28 A Cross-sectional Study of Direct Immunofluorescence in the Diagnosis of Immunobullous Dermatoses Buch, Archana C Kumar, Harsh Panicker, NK Misal, Sonali Sharma, YK Gore, Charusheela R Indian J Dermatol Dermatopathology Round BACKGROUND: Autoimmune blistering diseases are a group of bullous disorders characterized by pathogenic antibodies directed at the target antigens, which are components of the desmosomes or adhesion complex at the dermoepidermal junction. Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is invaluable in the diagnosis of these lesions. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of DIF in immunobullous dermatoses and to study the pattern of DIF. The study also aims to correlate DIF with clinical and histologic findings and to analyze discrepancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total 100 biopsies received over a period of 2 years in the Department of Pathology were analyzed. DIF, histopathology and clinical data were reviewed. RESULTS: Out of 100, 89 cases showed DIF patterns concordant with clinical/histologic diagnosis. The sensitivity of DIF was 94.44% (51/58) in the pemphigus and 84% (21/25) in the bullous pemphigoid (BP) group, 100% each in dermatitis herpetiformis (2/2) and linear IgA disease (1/1). A total of 11 histologically proven cases of immunobullous lesions were DIF negative-four (three of pemphigus vulgaris and one of BP) due to having no epidermis, three (cases of BP) owing to sampling/technical errors and the remaining four (cases of pemphigus vulgaris) due to being on treatment. CONCLUSION: Immunofluorescence helps confirm the diagnosis of bullous lesions in which there is clinical and the histopathologic overlap. Sampling errors contributed to false negative (FN) results. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4103273/ /pubmed/25071256 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.135488 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Dermatology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Dermatopathology Round
Buch, Archana C
Kumar, Harsh
Panicker, NK
Misal, Sonali
Sharma, YK
Gore, Charusheela R
A Cross-sectional Study of Direct Immunofluorescence in the Diagnosis of Immunobullous Dermatoses
title A Cross-sectional Study of Direct Immunofluorescence in the Diagnosis of Immunobullous Dermatoses
title_full A Cross-sectional Study of Direct Immunofluorescence in the Diagnosis of Immunobullous Dermatoses
title_fullStr A Cross-sectional Study of Direct Immunofluorescence in the Diagnosis of Immunobullous Dermatoses
title_full_unstemmed A Cross-sectional Study of Direct Immunofluorescence in the Diagnosis of Immunobullous Dermatoses
title_short A Cross-sectional Study of Direct Immunofluorescence in the Diagnosis of Immunobullous Dermatoses
title_sort cross-sectional study of direct immunofluorescence in the diagnosis of immunobullous dermatoses
topic Dermatopathology Round
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4103273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25071256
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.135488
work_keys_str_mv AT bucharchanac acrosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT kumarharsh acrosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT panickernk acrosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT misalsonali acrosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT sharmayk acrosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT gorecharusheelar acrosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT bucharchanac crosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT kumarharsh crosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT panickernk crosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT misalsonali crosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT sharmayk crosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses
AT gorecharusheelar crosssectionalstudyofdirectimmunofluorescenceinthediagnosisofimmunobullousdermatoses